Skip to main content
Log in

Consensual partnering in Australia: A review and 1991 census profile

  • Published:
Journal of the Australian Population Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is the second in a two-part examination of consensual partnering in Australia. The first part reviewed relevant literature and the deficiencies of census data for capturing the cohabiting population, and presented the basic demography of that population. This part extends the 1991 Census profile of the phenomenon. It traverses socio-demographic (religion and ethnicity), socio-economic (housing, labour force status, occupation and education) and geographic (residential mobility and residential location) attributes of those in consensual unions. It also briefly compares never-married and ever-married cohabitors as two distinct subgroups of the cohabiting population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blom, S. 1994. Marriage and cohabitation in a changing society: experience of Norwegian men and women born in 1945 and 1960.European Journal of Population 9: 143–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, G.A. 1993. Trans-Tasman population movement in the 1980s: insights from Australian data. Pp.64–124 in G.A. Carmichael (ed.),Trans-Tasman Migration: Trends, Causes and Consequences. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, G.A. 1995. Consensual partnering in the more developed countries,Journal of the Australian Population Association 12(1):51–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, G.A. 1996. Consensual partnering in New Zealand: evidence from three censuses.New Zealand Population Review 22: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, G. and C. Mason. 1998. Consensual partnering in Australia: a review and 1991 Census profile. Part 1: Review and basic demography.Journal of the Australian Population Association 15(1):131–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collmann, J. 1979. Women, children and the significance of the domestic group to urban Aborigines in Central Australia.Ethnology 18: 379–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glezer, H. 1993. To tie or not tie the knot pathways to family formation. Paper presented at the 4th Australian Family Research Conference, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, A 1983. Australian Aboriginal fertility in decline. Ph.D thesis, Australian National University.

  • Gray, A. 1984. Aboriginal marriage and survival.Journal of the Australian Population Association 1: 18–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, S-E. 1986.Living Together: Young Couples in de facto Relationships. Working Paper No. 10. Melbourne: Collins Dove for the Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, S-E. 1987. Living together as married: a profile ofde facto couples in Australia.Journal of Marriage and the Family 49: 185–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijzing, E. 1988. Socio-economic characteristics of lifestyles and living arrangements in the Netherlands. Pp.97–117 in R.L. Cliquet, G. Dooghe, J. de Jong Gierveld and F. van Poppel (eds),Population and Family in the Low Countries VI. The Hague/Brussels: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute and the Population and Family Study Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liefbroer, A.C. and J. de Jong Gierveld. 1993. The impact of rational considerations and perceived opinions on young adults’ union formation intentions.Journal of Family Issues 14(2):213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. 1986. Housing. Pp.151–170 in P. McDonald (ed.),Setting Up: Property and Income Distribution on Divorce in Australia. Sydney: Prentice-Hall for the Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostby, L. 1988. Modern family formation.Scandinavian Population Studies 8: 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K.V. 1989. What is happening to cohabitation in Canada? Pp.269–286 in International Union for the Scientific Study of Population,International Population Conference, New Delhi 1989, Volume 3 liege: IUSSP.

  • Santow, G. and M. Bracher. 1994. Change and continuity in the formation of first marital unions in Australia.Population Studies 48(3):475–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsolidis, G. 1995. Greek-Australian families. Pp.121–143 in R. Hartley (ed.),Families and Cultural Diversity in Australia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin for the Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasta, E. 1995. The Italian-Australian family, transformations and continuities. Pp.144–166 in R. Hartley (ed.),Families and Cultural Diversity in Australia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin for the Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, C. 1993. Are there any differences between New Zealand immigrants and the Australian-born population? Socioeconomic and demographic issues. Pp. 183–215 in GA. Carmichael (ed.),Trans-Tasman Migration: Trends, Causes and Consequences. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carmichael, G., Mason, C. Consensual partnering in Australia: A review and 1991 census profile. Journal of Population Research 16, 1–27 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029452

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029452

Keywords

Navigation