Abstract
A 22-year-old man presented to the Nuclear Medicine Clinic for evaluation of distal right tibial pain. The patient reported recently beginning a rigorous exercise program involving lower extremity impact temporally related to the onset and worsening of the pain. The physical examination was remarkable for significant tenderness to palpation of the distal one-third of his right tibia. The presumptive diagnosis was a stress fracture. Recent roentgenograms of the right tibia were not available for review but were reportedly normal. Scintigraphy, in combination with computed tomography, revealed an unusual type of stress fracture (particularly in a young person and in relation to exercise)—a longitudinal stress fracture.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Van der Wall H, Kannangara S, MageeM. In:Nuclear Medicine in Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment, Ell PJ, Gambhir SS (eds), Edinburgh; Churchill Livingston, 2004: 729.
Clayer M, Krishnan J, Lee WK, TamblynP. Longitudinal stress fracture of the tibia: two cases.Clinical Radiology 1992; 46: 401–104.
Keating JF, Beggs I, Thorpe GW. 3 cases of longitudinal stress fracture of the tibia.Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66 (1): 41–42.
Daunt N, Gribbin D, Slater GS. Longitudinal tibial stress fracture.Australasian Radiology 1998; 42: 188–190.
Miniaci A, Mc LarenAC, Haddad RG. Longitudinal stress fracture: case report.Journal of the Canadian Association of Radiologists 1988; 39: 221–223.
Jeske JM, Lomasney LM, Demos TC, Vade A, Bielski RJ. Longitudinal tibial stress fracture.Orthopedics 1996; 19: 266–270.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The opinions expressed in this work are those of the authors,and do not reflect the official policy or the position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or the U.S. government.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schraml, F.V., De Dios, R.L.R. & Flemming, D.J. Exercise-related longitudinal tibial stress fracture in a young person. Ann Nucl Med 20, 441–444 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03027381
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03027381