Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Canadian Anaesthetists’ Society Journal
  3. Article
Single lever Humphrey A.D.E. low flow universal anaesthetic breathing system
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

Work of breathing during HHHFNC and synchronised NIPPV following extubation

30 October 2018

Elinor Charles, Katie A. Hunt, … Anne Greenough

A comparison of controlled ventilation with a noninvasive ventilator versus traditional mask ventilation

23 July 2019

Mike Fogarty, Kai Kuck, … Derek Sakata

The F Breathing Circuit, a universal single-limb breathing circuit: brief historical perspective

11 March 2019

Atsuo Fukunaga

Manual volume delivery via Frova Intubating Introducer: a bench research study

12 February 2019

Preeti Dewan, James Taylor, … Simon Massey

Use of the MIRUS™ system for general anaesthesia during surgery: a comparison of isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane

09 April 2018

Martin Bellgardt, Dominik Drees, … Jennifer Herzog-Niescery

Additional work of breathing from trigger errors in mechanically ventilated children

10 November 2020

Robert G. T. Blokpoel, Alette A. Koopman, … Martin C. J. Kneyber

Feasibility of an alternative, physiologic, individualized open-lung approach to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in children

18 January 2019

Pauline de Jager, Tamara Kamp, … Martin C. J. Kneyber

Increasing the reflection efficiency of the Sedaconda ACD-S by heating and cooling the anaesthetic reflector: a bench study using a test lung

10 January 2023

Andreas Meiser, Pierre Louis Fernando Meis, … Azzeddine Kermad

Refractory ineffective triggering during pressure support ventilation: effect of proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors

20 October 2021

Anne-Fleur Haudebourg, Tommaso Maraffi, … Guillaume Carteaux

Download PDF
  • Published: November 1986

Single lever Humphrey A.D.E. low flow universal anaesthetic breathing system

Part I: Comparison with dual lever A.D.E., Magill and Bain systems in anaesthetized spontaneously breathing adults

  • David Humphrey1,
  • John G. Brock-Utne1 &
  • John W. Downing1 

Canadian Anaesthetists’ Society Journal volume 33, pages 698–709 (1986)Cite this article

  • 636 Accesses

  • 18 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The single lever Humphrey A.D.E. anaesthetic system, in both coaxial and parallel (non-coaxial) forms, has recently been introduced. In principle the system offers efficient“universal” function by combining the advantages of Mapleson A, D and E systems. A within-patient comparison of its function in the Mapleson A mode (lever up) in spontaneously-breathing anaesthetized subjects was made to that of the original two lever A.D.E., the Magill (Mapleson A) and the Bain (Mapleson D) systems. The coaxial and parallel single lever A.D.E. systems functioned identically to each other and to the original two lever A.D.E. system, a mean fresh gas flow (FGF) of 51 ml.kg-1.min-1 causing minimal rebreathing. Under identical conditions, the mean FGF required to just cause rebreathing increased to a mean of 71 ml.kg-1.min-1 and 150 ml.kg-1.min-1 with the Magill and the Bain systems respectively. With the single lever system, the switch to its Mapleson E mode for controlled ventilation involves the selection of the only alternative lever position (lever down) without further adjustment. The function and practical advantages in this E mode are presented in Part II.

Résumé

Le système de Humphrey A.D.E, à levier unique pour des circuits anesthésiques tant dans les formes coaxiales que les formes parallèles (non coaxiales) a été récemment introduit. En principe le système offre un fonctionnement universel efficace en combinant les avantages du système Mapleson A. Det E. Une comparaison de sonfonctionnemenl en mode E chez des patients aneslhésiés en respiration spontanée a été faite avec celle du circuit Magill (Mapleson A) et du circuit de Bain (Mapleson B). Le système coaxial est parallèle à levier unique A.D.E. lorsqu’ employé avec des flots de gaz frais moyens de 51 ml.kg-1.min-1 n’a provoqué qu’une réinspiration minime. Sous des conditions indentiques, le flot de gaz frais moyen requis pour provoquer la réinspiration était de 71 ml. kg-1.min-1 pour le circuit Magill et de 150 ml.kg-1.min-1 pour le système de Bain. En pratique, le contrôle de la pollution dans les salles d’opération était facilité avec le système A.D.E. par une réduction simultanée des flots de gaz fraiset la facilité d’attache du système anti pollution à la machine. Le fonctionnement et les avantages pratiques de ce circuit sont présentés.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

Abbreviations

A.D.E.:

Humphrey A.D.E. anaesthetic breathing system

A.D.E.:

A.D.E. set in A mode

A.D.E.:

A.D.E. set in D mode

A.D.E.:

A.D.E. set in E mode

FGF:

Fresh gas flow

PiCO2 :

Minimum inspired carbon dioxide tension

PéCO2 :

End-expired (or end-tidal) carbon dioxide tension

References

  1. Nunn JF. Applied Respiratory Physiology. Ed 2, Butterworths; London, 1977, p 233.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dixon J, Chakrabarti MK, Morgan M. An assessment of the Humphrey A.D.E. anaesthetic system in the Mapleson A mode during spontaneous ventilation. Anaesthesia 1984; 39: 593–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shulman JS, Brodsky JB. The A.D.E. system — a new anesthetic breathing system. Anesth Analg 1984; 63: 273.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Humphrey D. A new anaesthetic breathing system combining Mapleson A, D and E principles: a simple apparatus for low flow universal use without carbon dioxide absorption. Anaesthesia 1983; 38: 361–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dennison PH. Co-axial tubing for conventional anaesthetic systems. Anaesthesia 1984; 39: 841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Humphrey D. The A.D.E. anaesthetic breathing system. Anaesthesia 1984; 39: 715–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Humphrey D, Brock-Utne JG, Downing JW. Single lever Humphrey A.D.E. low flow universal breathing system. Part II: Comparison with the Bain system in anaesthetized adults during controlled ventilation. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1986; 33: 710–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gravenstein N, Lampotang S, Beneken JEW. Factors influencing capnography in the Bain system. J Clin Monitoring 1985; 1: 6–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lack JA. Theatre pollution control. Anaesthesia 1976; 31: 259–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Humphrey D. The Lack, Magill and Bain anaesthetic breathing systems: a direct comparison in spontaneously breathing anaesthetized adults. J Roy Soc Med 1982; 75: 513–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bain JA.Spoerel WE. A streamlined anaesthetic system. Can Anaesth Soc J 1972; 19: 426–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Goodwin K. Bain circuit. Can Anaesth Soc J 1976; 23: 675.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mansell WH. Spontaneous breathing with the Bain circuit at low flow rates: a case report. Can Anaesth Soc J 1976; 23: 432–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rose DK, Byrick RJ, Froese AB. Carbon dioxide elimination during spontaneous ventilation with a modified Mapleson D system: studies in a lung model. Can Anaesth Soc J 1978; 25: 353–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nott MR, Norman J. The Bain and Lack breathing systems. Anaesthesia 1981; 36: 635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Conway CM, Barnes PK. The Bain breathing system. Anaesthesia 1982; 37: 100–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nott MR, Norman J. Rebreathing and the Bain circuit. Anesthesiology 1983; 58: 392–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dean SE, Keenan RL. Rebreathing and the Bain circuit. Anesthesiology 1983; 58: 393–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Humphrey D. Rebreathing and the Bain circuit. Anesthesiology 1984; 60: 80–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Alexander JP. Clinical comparisons of the Bain and Magill anaesthetic systems during spontaneous respiration. Br J Anaesth 1982; 54: 1031–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Conway CM, Seeley HF, Barnes PK. Spontaneous ventilation with the Bain anaesthetic system. Br J Anaesth 1977; 49: 1245–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. lingerer MJ. A comparison between the Bain and Magill anaesthetic systems during spontaneous breathing. Can Anaesth Soc J 1978; 25: 122–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Byrick RJ. Respiratory compensation during spontaneous ventilation with the Bain circuit. Can Anaesth Soc J 1980; 27: 96–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nott MR, Walters FJM, Norman J. The Lack and Bain systems in spontaneous respiration. Anaesth Intensive Care 1982; 10: 333–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Flynn PJ, Morris LE. Humidity in anaesthetic systems. Br J Anaesth 1981; 53: 1096.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor MB. A suggestion. Anaesthesia 1983; 38: 906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Newton N, Cundy JM. The ultimate goal? Anaesthesia 1983; 38: 906–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Burchett KR, Bennett JA. A new co-axial breathing system; a combination of the benefits of Mapleson A, D and E systems. Anaesthesia 1985; 40: 181–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramaya GP. Multi-mode switchable breathing systems. Anaesthesia 1985; 40: 706–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Manicom AW, Schoonbee CG. The Johannesburg A-D circuit switch; a valve device for converting a co-axial Mapleson D into a co-axial Mapleson A system. Br J Anaesth 1979; 51: 1185–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Humphrey D. A new coaxial breathing system. Anaesthesia 1985; 40: 1136–7.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kain ML, Nunn JF. Fresh gas economics of the Magill system. Anesthesiology 1968; 29: 964–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Norman J, Adams AP, Sykes MK. Rebreathing with the Magill attachment. Anesthesia 1968; 23: 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Conway CM, Davis FM, Knight HJ, Leigh JM, Preston TD, Tennant R. An experimental study of gaseous homeostasis and the Magill circuit using low fresh gas flows. Br J Anaesth 1976; 48; 447–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Conway CM. Alveolar gas relationships during the use of semi-closed rebreathing anaesthetic systems. Br J Anaesth 1976; 48: 865–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Barnes PK, Conway CM. The Lack system — a further reply. Anaesthesia 1983; 38: 603.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Conway CM. Anaesthetic breathing systems. Br J Anaesth 1985; 57: 649–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Humphrey D. Rebreathing and the Bain circuit. Can Anaesth Soc J 1984; 31, 343–4. 39 Nunn JF. Applied Respiratory Physiology. Ed 2, Butterworths; London, 1977, p 186.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Bain JA, Spoerel WE. Carbon dioxide output and elimination in children under anaesthesia. Can Anaesth Soc J 1977; 24: 533–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Nunn JF. Applied Respiratory Physiology. Ed 2, Butterworths; London, 1977, p 354.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kain ML, Panday J, NunnJ F. The effect of intubation on the deadspace during halothane anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1969; 41: 94–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Spoerel WE, Aitken RR, Bain JA. Spontaneous respiration with the Bain breathing circuit. Can Anaesth Soc J 1978; 25: 30–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. White DC, Halsey MJ. Anaesthetic apparatus. In: Gray TC, Utting JE, Nunn JF, eds. General Anaesthesia. Ed 4, London: Butterworths, 1980: 967–91.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nunn JF. Potential economics of using closed circuit anesthesia. In: Aldrete JA, Lowe HJ, Virtue RW, eds. Low Flow and Closed System Anesthesia. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1979: 109–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Faculty of Medicine, Departments of Anaesthetics and Physiology, University of Natal, 4013 Congella, PO Box 17039, Durban, South Africa

    David Humphrey, John G. Brock-Utne & John W. Downing

Authors
  1. David Humphrey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John G. Brock-Utne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John W. Downing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Humphrey, D., Brock-Utne, J.G. & Downing, J.W. Single lever Humphrey A.D.E. low flow universal anaesthetic breathing system. Can Anaesth Soc J 33, 698–709 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03027118

Download citation

  • Issue Date: November 1986

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03027118

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Key words

  • equipment: anaesthetic breathing systems: Bain
  • Humphrey A.D.E.
  • Magill
  • Mapleson
  • ventilation: spontaneous
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 34.239.152.207

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.