Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating the structure and the pattern in self-regulated learning by high school students

  • Article and Report
  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The research to explain student’s self-regulated learning has grown rapidly in recent years. However, the studies on self-regulated learning have shown fascinating but mixed results. Thus, there is a need to identify and describe the key dimensions of self-regulated learning according to an empirical framework in order to integrate these complex results. This study attempts to explore the structure and the pattern of self-regulated learning. In a sample of high-school students, it was found that self-regulated learning consists of three components; cognitive regulation, motivational regulation, behavioral regulation. The result also shows that students can be grouped into six clusters in terms of these components. This study appears to be useful for understanding self-regulated learning conceptually but has some methodological limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, C. & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals on the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivational processes.Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A (1989). Human Agency in social cognitive theory.American Psychologist,44, 1175–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989).Structural Equations with Latent Variables. NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L. & Mandinach, E.B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation.Educational Psychologist, 18, 88–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E.L. (1988). A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality.Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, E. S. & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, Jr, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995).Multivariate data analysis with readings(4th ed.). NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K & Sorbom (1993).LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling and Prelis2. Chicago:SSI

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1985).Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior consistency: self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.),Action cotrol: from cognition to behavior, West Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1987). Action control: the maintenance of motivational states. In F. Halisch., & J. Kuhl (Eds.),Motivation, intention, and volition, New York: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin, J. C. (1998).Latent variable models. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, R.S. & Goldin, L. (1990). Children’s reluctance to seek help with schoolwork.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 92–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance.Psychological Review, 91, 328–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolen, S. B. & Haladyna, T. M. (1990). Personal & Environmental influences on students’ beliefs about effective study strategies.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 116–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G. & Brynes, J.P. (1989).The constructive approach to self-regulation and learning in the classroom. In D.Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.).Self-regulation of learning and performance: issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P. L., Swing, S. R., Braverman, M. T., and Buss, R. (1982). Students’ aptitudes and their reports of cognitive processes during direct instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 535–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (1991). Editor’s comment.Educational Psychologist, 26, 199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1983). Developing children’s self-efficacy and skills: the roles of social comparative information and goal setting.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning.Educational Psychologist, 25, 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M.C. Wittrock (Eds.).Handbook of research on teaching. Macmillan.

  • Weinstein, C. E., Schulte, A., & Palmer, D. (1987). LASSI:Learning and study strategies inventory. Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A. (1994). The role of children’s achievement values in the self-regulation of their learning outcomes. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk(Ed.).Selfregulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses?.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 307–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.).Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1989b). A Social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies.American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student Differences in self-regulated learning: relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk, D. H. (1989).Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myonghee Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, M. Investigating the structure and the pattern in self-regulated learning by high school students. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 6, 162–169 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03026784

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03026784

Key Words

Navigation