Skip to main content
Log in

Labour perspectives on the new politics of skill and competency formation: International reflections

  • Article and Report
  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Skill/competency approaches to workplace-based policy seek to assess and train for discrete individual competencies with the goal of increasing employability and productivity. These approaches have become increasingly prominent across a range of advanced capitalist countries. A substantial critique has emerged over this same period regarding issues of instrumentality and social control, as well as the failure of skill/compentancy approaches to articulate a meaningful understanding of human learning capacities. In this article, these critical perspectives are clarified further by a review of contributions to understanding the skill/competence question emerging from sociology of work literature. Building from these critiques, this article outlines recent experiences with and perspectives on skill/competency frameworks amongst different national labour movements. Included in this outline is a more detailed, comparative analysis of Norway and Canada; here we see the lofty ‘new’, ‘knowledge economy’ rhetoric — in two countries where one might expect to see it blossom in application — brought down to earth by the realities of industrial relations, employer intransigence and intra-labour movement differences. ‘Skill/competence’ proves to be a floating signifier that, amongst both employers and labour, stands as a proxy for ‘power/control’ struggles. Degenerating in this way, from a labour perspective, the new politics of skill/competency formation is seen to have spiraled toward irrelevance in Norway and Canada; awaiting, in both countries, a re-invigoration through attention to changes in the participatory structure of the labour process itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (2004). $37M boost to sector councils.Canadian HR Reporter,17(7), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldry, C, Bain, P., & Taylor, P. (1998). Bright satanic offices: Intensification, control and team taylorism. In P. Thompson & C. Warhurst (Eds.),Workplaces of the Future (pp.163–183). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boreham, N. (2004). A theory of collective competence: Challenging the neo-liberal individualisation of performance at work.British Journal of Educational Studies, 52(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. (1974).Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., Green, A., & Lauder, H. (2001).High skills: Globalisation, competitiveness and skill formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (1979).Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labour process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Labour Congress (2005, August).Essential skills and the labour movement. Ottawa: Canadian Labour Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Labour Congress (2006).To the house of commons standing committee on human resources,social development and the status of persons with disabilities. Retrieved November, 2007, from http:// canadianlabour.ca/updir/HUMA-Brief-FINAL-E.pdf.

  • Coffield, F. (2000). Introduction: A critical analysis of the concept of a learning society. In F. Coffield (Ed.),Different visions of a learning society (pp. 1–38). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, R., & Stuart, M. (Eds.). (2004).Trade unions and training: Issues and international perspectives (pp. 1- 18). Caulfield: National Key Centre in Industrial Relations, Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, S. (1992).Why adults learn: Towards a theory of participation in adult education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., Guo, S., Sawchuk, P., Valentin, C., & Wheelahan, L. (2005, December).Essential skills, globalization and neo-liberal policy: Challenging skills-based agendas for workplace learning. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Researching Work and Learning. Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, K. (2005). Learning for revival: British trade unions and workplace learning.Continuing Education, 27(3), 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel, S., Korczynski, M., Shire, K., & Tarn, M. (1999).On the front live: Organization of work in the information economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. (2002). The many faces of lifelong learning: Recent education policy trends in Europe.Journal of Education Policy, 17(6), 611–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, B. (2005). Canadian organizations move to develop workplace literacy and numerical skills.Canadian HR Reporter, 18(13), 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • HRSDC (2005a).Essential skills. Ottawa, ON: Human Resources and Skills Development of Canada. Retrieved May, 2007, from http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/ en/hip/hrp/essential_skills/essential_skills_index.shtml.

    Google Scholar 

  • HRSDC (2005b).Essential skills: Tools and applications, Retrieved May, 2007, from http://wwwl5.hrdc- drhc.gc.ca/English/general/ToolsAppse.asp.

  • Hurd, R. (2001). Contesting the dinosaur image: The US labour movement’s search for a future.Transfer, 7(3), 451–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, N. (1991).Skills formation and gender relations: The politics of who knows what. Geelong: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (1999). Social partnership in Britain: Good for profits, bad for jobs and unions.Communist Review, 30, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafer, G. (2004). What is ‘skill’? Training for discipline in the low-wage labour market. In C. Warhurst, I. Grugulis, & E. Keep (Eds.),The skills that matter (pp. 109–127). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler, C. (1982).The development of the labour process in capitalist societies: A comparative analysis of work organization in Britain, the USA and Japan. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, D. W. (2004).Education-jobs gap (2nd ed.). Toronto: Broadview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. & Ross, G. (Eds.). (1999).The brave new world of European labour. New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez Lucio, M., Skule, S., Kruse, W. Trappmann, & Trappmann, V. (2007). Regulating skill formation in Europe: German, Norwegian and Spanish policies on transferable skills.European Journal of Industrial Relations, 13(3), 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mojab, S. (1999). De-skilling immigrant women.Canadian Woman Studies, 19(3), 123–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nergaard, K. (2006).Norway trade union density stable. European Industrial Relations Observatory Online, (Doc ID NO0605029I).

  • Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995).The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2002).Review of national policies for education: Lifelong learning in Norway. Paris: OECD publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004).Developing highly skilled workers: Review of Norway. Paris: OECD publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, M., Codd, J., & O’Neill, A.M. (2004).Education policy: Globalisation, citizenship and democracy. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. (2000). The unbearable lightness of skill: The changing meaning of skill in UK policy discourses and some implications for education and training.Journal of Educational Policy, 15(3), 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. (2006). The Norwegian competence reform and the limits of lifelong learning.International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(5), 477–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peetz, D. (1998).Unions in a contrary world: The future of the Australian trade union movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pencavel, J. (2005). Unionism viewed internationally.Journal of Labor Research, 26(1), 65–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainbird, H. (Ed.). (2000).Training in the workplace. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rikowski, G. (2001). Education for industry: A complex technicism.Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawchuk, P. H. (2003a).Adult learning and technology in working-class life. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawchuk, P. H. (2003b). The ‘unionization effect’ amongst adult computer learners.British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(5), 639–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawchuk, P. H. (2007).Understanding the work/learning implications of ‘community unionism ’ in Canada: The case of hotel workers organizing in Toronto. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Researching Work and Learning, Capetown, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, C. & Burke, G. (2005). Skills shortages: Concepts, measurement and policy Responses.Australian Bulletin of Labour, 31(1), 44–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skule, S. & Reichborn, A. (2002).Learning-conducive work: A survey of learning conditions in Norwegian workplaces. Luxembourg: CEDEFOP (Luxembourg Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skule, S., Stuart, M., & Nyen, T. (2002). International briefing: Training and development in Norway.International Journal of Training and Development, 6(4), 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spenner, K. (1979). Temporal changes in work content.American Sociological Review, 44(6), 968–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teige, B. (2004). Trade union involvement in lifelong learning in Norway. In R. Cooney & M. Stuart (Eds.),Trade unions and training: Issues and international perspectives (pp. 162–174). Caulfield: National Key Centre in Industrial Relations, Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. (2003). Disconnected capitalism: Or why employers can‘t keep their side of the bargain.Work, Employment and Society, 17(2), 359–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinker, T. (2002). Specters of Marx and braverman in the twilight of postmodernist labour process research.Work, Employment and Society, 16(2), 251–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vince, R. (2005). Ideas for critical practitioners. In C. Elliot & S. Turnbull (Eds.),Critical thinking in human resource development. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vu, U. (2005). Northern mine develops essential skills in its workforce.Canadian HR Reporter, 18(3), 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, J. (2000). Towards a reform agenda? European trade unions in transition.Industrial Relations Journal, 31(4), 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, J. (2001). Articulating trade union organisation for the new Europe?Industrial Relations Journal, 32(5), 449–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, J. & Kerr, A. (1999). Trying to stem the flow: Union membership turnover in the public sector.Industrial Relations Journal, 30, 184–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warhurst, C., Grugulis, I., & Keep, E. (2004).The skills that matter. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warhurst, C. & Thompson, P. (2006). Mapping knowledge in work: Proxies or practices?Work, Employment and Society, 20(4), 787–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S. (1982).The degradation of work? Skill, de-skilling and the labour process. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbalist, A. (1979).Case studies on the labor process. London: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Sawchuk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sawchuk, P. Labour perspectives on the new politics of skill and competency formation: International reflections. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 9, 50–62 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03025825

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03025825

Key words

Navigation