Abstract
Skill/competency approaches to workplace-based policy seek to assess and train for discrete individual competencies with the goal of increasing employability and productivity. These approaches have become increasingly prominent across a range of advanced capitalist countries. A substantial critique has emerged over this same period regarding issues of instrumentality and social control, as well as the failure of skill/compentancy approaches to articulate a meaningful understanding of human learning capacities. In this article, these critical perspectives are clarified further by a review of contributions to understanding the skill/competence question emerging from sociology of work literature. Building from these critiques, this article outlines recent experiences with and perspectives on skill/competency frameworks amongst different national labour movements. Included in this outline is a more detailed, comparative analysis of Norway and Canada; here we see the lofty ‘new’, ‘knowledge economy’ rhetoric — in two countries where one might expect to see it blossom in application — brought down to earth by the realities of industrial relations, employer intransigence and intra-labour movement differences. ‘Skill/competence’ proves to be a floating signifier that, amongst both employers and labour, stands as a proxy for ‘power/control’ struggles. Degenerating in this way, from a labour perspective, the new politics of skill/competency formation is seen to have spiraled toward irrelevance in Norway and Canada; awaiting, in both countries, a re-invigoration through attention to changes in the participatory structure of the labour process itself.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anonymous (2004). $37M boost to sector councils.Canadian HR Reporter,17(7), 3.
Baldry, C, Bain, P., & Taylor, P. (1998). Bright satanic offices: Intensification, control and team taylorism. In P. Thompson & C. Warhurst (Eds.),Workplaces of the Future (pp.163–183). London: Macmillan.
Boreham, N. (2004). A theory of collective competence: Challenging the neo-liberal individualisation of performance at work.British Journal of Educational Studies, 52(1), 5–17.
Braverman, H. (1974).Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Brown, P., Green, A., & Lauder, H. (2001).High skills: Globalisation, competitiveness and skill formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burawoy, M. (1979).Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labour process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Canadian Labour Congress (2005, August).Essential skills and the labour movement. Ottawa: Canadian Labour Congress.
Canadian Labour Congress (2006).To the house of commons standing committee on human resources,social development and the status of persons with disabilities. Retrieved November, 2007, from http:// canadianlabour.ca/updir/HUMA-Brief-FINAL-E.pdf.
Coffield, F. (2000). Introduction: A critical analysis of the concept of a learning society. In F. Coffield (Ed.),Different visions of a learning society (pp. 1–38). Bristol: Policy Press.
Cooney, R., & Stuart, M. (Eds.). (2004).Trade unions and training: Issues and international perspectives (pp. 1- 18). Caulfield: National Key Centre in Industrial Relations, Monash University.
Courtney, S. (1992).Why adults learn: Towards a theory of participation in adult education. New York: Routledge.
Fenwick, T., Guo, S., Sawchuk, P., Valentin, C., & Wheelahan, L. (2005, December).Essential skills, globalization and neo-liberal policy: Challenging skills-based agendas for workplace learning. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Researching Work and Learning. Sydney, Australia.
Forrester, K. (2005). Learning for revival: British trade unions and workplace learning.Continuing Education, 27(3), 257–270.
Frenkel, S., Korczynski, M., Shire, K., & Tarn, M. (1999).On the front live: Organization of work in the information economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Green, A. (2002). The many faces of lifelong learning: Recent education policy trends in Europe.Journal of Education Policy, 17(6), 611–626.
Hayes, B. (2005). Canadian organizations move to develop workplace literacy and numerical skills.Canadian HR Reporter, 18(13), 7–10.
HRSDC (2005a).Essential skills. Ottawa, ON: Human Resources and Skills Development of Canada. Retrieved May, 2007, from http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/ en/hip/hrp/essential_skills/essential_skills_index.shtml.
HRSDC (2005b).Essential skills: Tools and applications, Retrieved May, 2007, from http://wwwl5.hrdc- drhc.gc.ca/English/general/ToolsAppse.asp.
Hurd, R. (2001). Contesting the dinosaur image: The US labour movement’s search for a future.Transfer, 7(3), 451–465.
Jackson, N. (1991).Skills formation and gender relations: The politics of who knows what. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Kelly, J. (1999). Social partnership in Britain: Good for profits, bad for jobs and unions.Communist Review, 30, 3–10.
Lafer, G. (2004). What is ‘skill’? Training for discipline in the low-wage labour market. In C. Warhurst, I. Grugulis, & E. Keep (Eds.),The skills that matter (pp. 109–127). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Littler, C. (1982).The development of the labour process in capitalist societies: A comparative analysis of work organization in Britain, the USA and Japan. London: Heinemann.
Livingstone, D. W. (2004).Education-jobs gap (2nd ed.). Toronto: Broadview.
Martin, A. & Ross, G. (Eds.). (1999).The brave new world of European labour. New York: Berghahn.
Martinez Lucio, M., Skule, S., Kruse, W. Trappmann, & Trappmann, V. (2007). Regulating skill formation in Europe: German, Norwegian and Spanish policies on transferable skills.European Journal of Industrial Relations, 13(3), 323–340.
Mojab, S. (1999). De-skilling immigrant women.Canadian Woman Studies, 19(3), 123–128.
Nergaard, K. (2006).Norway trade union density stable. European Industrial Relations Observatory Online, (Doc ID NO0605029I).
Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995).The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
OECD (2002).Review of national policies for education: Lifelong learning in Norway. Paris: OECD publications.
OECD (2004).Developing highly skilled workers: Review of Norway. Paris: OECD publications.
Olsen, M., Codd, J., & O’Neill, A.M. (2004).Education policy: Globalisation, citizenship and democracy. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage publications.
Payne, J. (2000). The unbearable lightness of skill: The changing meaning of skill in UK policy discourses and some implications for education and training.Journal of Educational Policy, 15(3), 353–369.
Payne, J. (2006). The Norwegian competence reform and the limits of lifelong learning.International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(5), 477–505.
Peetz, D. (1998).Unions in a contrary world: The future of the Australian trade union movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pencavel, J. (2005). Unionism viewed internationally.Journal of Labor Research, 26(1), 65–97.
Rainbird, H. (Ed.). (2000).Training in the workplace. London: Macmillan.
Rikowski, G. (2001). Education for industry: A complex technicism.Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 29–49.
Sawchuk, P. H. (2003a).Adult learning and technology in working-class life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sawchuk, P. H. (2003b). The ‘unionization effect’ amongst adult computer learners.British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(5), 639–648.
Sawchuk, P. H. (2007).Understanding the work/learning implications of ‘community unionism ’ in Canada: The case of hotel workers organizing in Toronto. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Researching Work and Learning, Capetown, South Africa.
Shah, C. & Burke, G. (2005). Skills shortages: Concepts, measurement and policy Responses.Australian Bulletin of Labour, 31(1), 44–71.
Skule, S. & Reichborn, A. (2002).Learning-conducive work: A survey of learning conditions in Norwegian workplaces. Luxembourg: CEDEFOP (Luxembourg Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
Skule, S., Stuart, M., & Nyen, T. (2002). International briefing: Training and development in Norway.International Journal of Training and Development, 6(4), 263–276.
Spenner, K. (1979). Temporal changes in work content.American Sociological Review, 44(6), 968–975.
Teige, B. (2004). Trade union involvement in lifelong learning in Norway. In R. Cooney & M. Stuart (Eds.),Trade unions and training: Issues and international perspectives (pp. 162–174). Caulfield: National Key Centre in Industrial Relations, Monash University.
Thompson, P. (2003). Disconnected capitalism: Or why employers can‘t keep their side of the bargain.Work, Employment and Society, 17(2), 359–378.
Tinker, T. (2002). Specters of Marx and braverman in the twilight of postmodernist labour process research.Work, Employment and Society, 16(2), 251–281.
Vince, R. (2005). Ideas for critical practitioners. In C. Elliot & S. Turnbull (Eds.),Critical thinking in human resource development. New York: Routledge.
Vu, U. (2005). Northern mine develops essential skills in its workforce.Canadian HR Reporter, 18(3), 8–10.
Waddington, J. (2000). Towards a reform agenda? European trade unions in transition.Industrial Relations Journal, 31(4), 317–330.
Waddington, J. (2001). Articulating trade union organisation for the new Europe?Industrial Relations Journal, 32(5), 449–463.
Waddington, J. & Kerr, A. (1999). Trying to stem the flow: Union membership turnover in the public sector.Industrial Relations Journal, 30, 184–196.
Warhurst, C., Grugulis, I., & Keep, E. (2004).The skills that matter. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Warhurst, C. & Thompson, P. (2006). Mapping knowledge in work: Proxies or practices?Work, Employment and Society, 20(4), 787–800.
Wood, S. (1982).The degradation of work? Skill, de-skilling and the labour process. London: Hutchinson.
Zimbalist, A. (1979).Case studies on the labor process. London: Monthly Review Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sawchuk, P. Labour perspectives on the new politics of skill and competency formation: International reflections. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 9, 50–62 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03025825
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03025825