The Mathematical Intelligencer

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 3–5 | Cite as

Opinion

Paraconsistent thoughts about consistency
Department

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. George S. Boolos, John P. Burgess and Richard C. Jeffrey,Computability and Logic, 4th Ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. Chandler Davis, Criticisms of the usual rationale for validity in mathematics, inPhysicalism in Mathematics (A. D. Irvine, ed.), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1990, 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Peter Gay,The Naked Heart, Norton, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. Reuben Hersh,What is Mathematics, Really?, Oxford Univ. Press., 1997.Google Scholar
  5. Karl Menger,Reminiscences of the Vienna Circle and the Mathematical Colloquium, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1994.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Chris Mortensen,Inconsistent Mathematics, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1995.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Applied MathematicsBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations