Asia Pacific Education Review

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 59–71 | Cite as

Environmental attitudes of pre-service teachers: A conceptual and methodological dilemma in cross-cultural data collection

Articles And Reports

Abstract

Human generated environmental problems are significant issues of global concern. Despite this, varying attitudes towards environments continue to exist across the globe, impacting on environmental decision-making and action at local, national and international levels. This paper probes some of the similarities and differences in environmental attitudes amongst pre-service teachers in Australia, Republic of Maldives and Indonesia. Data were collected using an established environmental attitude questionnaire and individual interviews. The three communities exhibited a similar range of environmental attitudes using the established questionnaire but significant differences emerged when the interview data were analysed phenomenographically. These differences reflect diversity within and across cultural groups that cannot be satisfactorily explained by the theory underpinning the established questionnaire. Consequently, a revised conceptual framework is proposed.

Key Words

Environment education Attitude Cross-cultural Methodological Phenomenography 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arcury, T. A., & Christianson, E. H. (1990). Environmental worldview in response to environmental problems: Kentucky 1984 and 1988 compared.Environment and Behaviour, 22, 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other is self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness: a procedure and some preliminary findings.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 363–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumgart, N., & Halse, C. (1999) Approaches to learning across cultures: the role of assessment,Assessment in Education, 6(3), 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bechtel, R., Corral, V., & Pinheiro, J. (1997, July).The structure of environmental beliefs in students from three American countries: USA, Mexico and Brazil. Paper presented at the 26th Interamerican Congress of Psychology, Sao Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
  5. Biggs, J. B. (1994). Approaches to learning: nature and measurement of. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlewaite (Eds.).The International Encyclopedia of Education. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  6. Catton, W. R., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Environmental sociology: a new paradigm.American Sociologist, 13(1), 41–49.Google Scholar
  7. Catton, W. R., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). A new ecological paradigm for a post-exuberant sociology.The American Behavioural Scientist, 24(1), 15–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke, B. G. (1996). Environmental attitudes and knowledge of tear 11 students in a Queensland high school.Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 12, 19–26.Google Scholar
  9. Corral-Verdugo, V., & Armendarez, L. I. (2000). The new environmental paradigm in a Mexican community.Journal of Environmental Education, 31(3), 25–31.Google Scholar
  10. Costanza, R., Norton, B., & Haskell, J. B. (Eds.), (1992).Ecosystem health: new goals for environmental management. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The new environmental paradigm.Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10–19.Google Scholar
  12. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A., Catton, W. R., & Howell, R. (1992).Measuring endorsement of an ecological worldview: a revised NEP scale. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Rural Sociology Society, State College, PA.Google Scholar
  13. Dunlap, R. E., Van Leire, K. D., Mertig, A., & Jones, E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale.Journal of Social Issues, 556, 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eckersley, R. (1992).Environmentalism and political theory: towards an ecocentric approach. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  15. Furman, A. (1998) A note on environmental concern in a developing country results from an Istanbul survey.Environment and Behavior, 30(4), 520–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gooch, G. D. (1995). Environmental beliefs and attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic States.Environment and Behavior, 2(4), 513–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halse, C. (2001) Teachers and cultural identity: Developing Intercultural UnderstandingAsian Education Teachers’ Journal, 29(4), 16–21.Google Scholar
  18. Halse. C., & Baumgart, N. (2000). Cross cultural perspectives of teachers: a study in three countries.International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24, 455–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hooper, J. R., & Nielsen, J. M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behaviour: normative and behavioural strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program.Environment and Behaviour, 23, 195–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1989). Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 296–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kempton, W., Boster, J. S., & Hartley, J. (1995).Environmental values in American Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Leeming, F. C., Dwyer, W. O., Porter, B. E. & Cobern, M. K. (1993). Outcome research in environmental education: a critical review.Journal of Environmental Education, 24(4), 8–21.Google Scholar
  23. Mansaray, A., & Ajiboye, J. O. (1997). Environmental education and Nigerian student’s knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP): Implications for curriculum development.International Journal of Environmental Education and Information, 16(3), 317–324.Google Scholar
  24. Marton, F. (1994). Phenomenography. In T. Husen, & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.).The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol 8). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  25. Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.).The experience of learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Nash, R. (1990).The rights of nature: a history of environmental ethics. Leichhardt, Australia: Primavera Press.Google Scholar
  27. Rapport, D. J. (1995). Ecosystem health: exploring the territory.Ecosystem Health, 1, 5–13.Google Scholar
  28. Schoenfeld, I., & Berkowitz, A. R. (1996). Institutional reward systems for sustaining ecologists: activities in K-12 education.Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 75, 113–116.Google Scholar
  29. Schultz, P. W. (2001). Assessing the structure of environmental concern: concern for self, other people and the biosphere.Journal of Environmental Psychology,21.Google Scholar
  30. Schultz, P. W., Unipan J. B., & Gamba, R. J. (2000). Acculturation and ecological worldview among Latino Americans.Journal of Environmental Education, 31(2), 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental Social Psychology.10, 221–279. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shetzer, L., Stackman, R. W., & Moore, L. F. (1991). Businessenvironment attitudes and the new environmental paradigm.Journal of Environmental Education, 22, 14–21.Google Scholar
  33. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). The new ecological paradigm in socio-psychological context.Environment and Behavior, 27(6), 723–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern.Environment and Behaviour, 25, 322–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. UNESCO. (1997). Educating for a sustainable future: a transdisciplanary vision for concerned action. Paper presented at the International Conference on Environment and Society: Education and Public Awareness for Sustainability, Thessaloniki, Greece, 8-12, December.Google Scholar
  36. Watkins, D. A. (1996). Learning theories and approaches to research: a cross-cultural perspective. In D. A. Watkins, & J. B. Biggs (Eds.),The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences. Melbourne: Comparative Education Research Centre (CERC) and Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).Google Scholar
  37. Watkins, D., & Cheung, S. (1995). Culture, gender, and response bias.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 490–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. White, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecological crisis.Science, 155(3767), 1203–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wisner, B. (1995). Luta, livelihood and lifeworld in contemporary Africa. In B. R. Taylor, How to Understand African environmentalism in terms of place, livelihood and lifeworld, rather than in terms western environmentalism.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Education Research Institute 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of Western SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations