Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cohesion and the social construction of meaning in the essays of filipino college students writing in l2 english

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compares the degree of cohesion and coherence in the essays written by thirty Filipino college freshmen and analyzes how the social construction of meaning was made evident in their writing. Results showed that low, mid and highly rated essays were comparable in grammatical cohesive device use. Lexical repetition and use of synonyms were the most common means of establishing lexical cohesion. The findings suggest that second language writers with shared socio-cultural backgrounds utilize similar linguistic and textual resources in meaning construction, highlighting the socio-cognitive nature of writing practices and how literacy is a social act (Ramanathan & Kaplan, 2000). The students’ lexicogrammatical choices reflect the interrelationship of language and culture. Implications for second language pedagogy accounting for learners’ sociolinguistic backgrounds are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, D. (2003). L2 writing in the post-process era: Introduction.Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosher, S. (1998). The composing process of three Southeast Asian writers at the post-secondary level: An exploratory study.Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 205–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, C. (2004). Lexical cohesion and chain interaction: How L1 Arabic, Japanese and Spanish writers construct meaning in L2 English.Jurnal Bahasa Jendela Alam, 3, 289–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrell, P. L. (1982). Cohesion is not coherence.TESOL Quarterly, 16, 479–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, U. (1984). A study of cohesion and coherence in English as a second language students’ writing.Papers in Linguistics, 17, 301–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, U. (1987). Research frontiers in writing analysis.TESOL Quarterly, 21, 677–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Shiyab, S. (1997). Lexical cohesion with reference to the identity chain: Application of (IC) to different types of Arabic texts.International Review of Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 211–224. Retrieved March 25, 2004, from http://proquest.umi.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, D. R. (1994). Lexical and syntactic features of ESL writing by students at different levels of L2 proficiency.TESOL Quarterly, 28, 414–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, Y., & Oi, Y. L. M. (1992). A comparison of internal conjunctive cohesion in English essay writing of Cantonese speakers and native speakers of English.RELC Journal, 23, 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, G. (1989).Pragmatics and natural language understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, G., & Morgan, J. (1981). Pragmatics, grammar and discourse. In P. Cole (Ed.),Radical pragmatics (pp. 167–181). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976).Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985).Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Victoria: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harklau, L. (2002). The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition.Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 329–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (1984). Coherence and cohesive harmony. In J. Flood (Ed.),Understanding reading comprehension (pp. 181–219). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process.Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, A. M. (1986). Coherence and academic writing: some definitions and suggestions for teaching.TESOL Quarterly, 20, 247–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. (1992). Cohesion and coherence in compositions in Malay and English.RELC Journal, 23, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapels, A. R. (1990). An overview of second language writing process research. In B. Kroll (Ed.),Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 37–56). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I. (2002). Teaching coherence to ESL students: A classroom inquiry.Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 135–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, P. K. (1997). Contrastive rhetoric in context: A dynamic model of L2 writing.Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, P. K., Canagarajah, A.S., Harklau, L., Hyland, K., & Warschauer, M. (2003). Changing currents in second language writing research: A colloquium.Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 151–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCulley, G. A. (1985). Writing quality, coherence, and cohesion.Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 269–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J., & Sellner, M. (1980). Discourse and linguistic theory. In R. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. Breuer (Eds.),Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 165- 200). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuner, J. L. (1987). Cohesive ties and chains in good and poor freshman essays.Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norment, N., Jr. (1994). Contrastive analyses of cohesive devices in Chinese and Chinese ESL in narrative and expository written texts.Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 29, 49–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norment, N., Jr. (1995). Discourse features of African American students’ writings.Journal of Black Studies,25, 558. Available from Proquest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norment, N., Jr. (2002). Quantitative and qualitative analyses of textual cohesion in African American students’ writing in narrative, argumentative, and expository modes.CLA Journal, 46(1), 98. Retrieved March 25, 2004, from http://proquest.umi.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, G. (1991). Cohesion coherence: scientific texts. In E. Ventola (Ed.),Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses (pp. 415–429). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raimes, A. (1985). What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of composing.TESOL Quarterly, 19, 229–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raimes, A. (1987). Language proficiency, writing ability, and composing strategies: A study of ESL college student writers.Language Learning, 37, 439–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, V., & Kaplan, R. B. (2000). Genres, authors, discourse communities: Theory and application for (L1 and) L2 writing instruction.Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. (2000). Comments on “Local coherence and its limits: A second look at second sentences” - Another look.Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, T. (1988). Professors’ reactions to the academic writing of nonnative-speaking students.TESOL Quarterly, 22, 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, M. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes.Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 259–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R. (1995). Plagiarism and ideology: Identity in intercultural discourse.Language in Society, 24, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: the ESL research and its implications.TESOL Quarterly, 27, 657–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarone, E., Downing, B., Cohen, A., Gillette, S., Murie, R., & Dailey, B. (1993). The writing of Southeast Asian- American students in secondary school and university.Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, R. J., & Mosenthal, J. H. (1983). Cohesion and textual coherence.Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, A. (1994). The role of repetition in perceptions of discourse coherence.Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 671–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victori, M. (1999). An analysis of writing knowledge in EFL composing: A case study of two effective and two less effective writers.System, 27, 537–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witte, S. P., & Faigley, L. (1981). Coherence, cohesion and writing quality.College Composition and Communication, 32, 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: the process of discovering meaning.TESOL Quarterly, 16, 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies.TESOL Quarterly, 17, 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English and Applied Linguistics, William Hall, 309, De La Salle University, 2401, Taft Avenue, 1004, Malate, Manila, Philippines

    Carolyn D. Castro

Authors
  1. Carolyn D. Castro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn D. Castro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castro, C.D. Cohesion and the social construction of meaning in the essays of filipino college students writing in l2 english. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 5, 215–225 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024959

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024959

Key Words

Search

Navigation