Abstract
Two classes in Developmental Reading were trained in question-formulation and were then required to ask any number and type of questions based on four texts. Three inter-raters coded the questions for their content and form. The results of the study showed the dominance of recognition or retrieval questions, suggesting the students’ proficiency in reading for details and conversely, a deficiency in critical reading. In terms of form, although 57% of the questions were coherent and grammatical, this fact alone may not indicate a high English Language proficiency. There were also many instances of the direct copying of phrases from the original text, pointing to the students’ lack of confidence or ability in summarizing and paraphrasing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andre, M., & Anderson, T. (1978-1979). The development and evaluation of a self-questioning study technique.Reading Research Quarterly, 14(4), pp. 605–623.
Bloom, B. (Ed.) (1956).Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I. Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co.
Davey, B., & McBride, S. (1986a). Effects of question generation training on reading comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 256–262.
Davey, B., & McBride, S. (1986b). Generating self-questions after reading: A comprehension assist for elementary students.Journal of Educational Research, 80(1), 43–46.
Devine, J. (1987). General linguistic competence and adult L2 reading. In J. Devine, P. Carrell, & D. Eskey (Eds.),Research in Reading in English as a Second Language (pp. 75–86). Washington D.C.: TESOL.
Duffy, G., Roehler, L., & Herrmann, B.A. (1988). Modeling mental processes helps poor readers become strategic readers. In R. Allington (Ed.),Teaching Struggling Readers (pp. 162–167). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Asso.
Frase, L., & Schwartz, B. (1975). Effect of question production and answering on prose recall.Journal of Educational Psychology, 72 (5), 628–635.
Gillespie, C. (1990). Questions about student-generated questions.Journal of Reading, 34(4), 250–257.
Gonzales, R. (2000). Types, techniques, and taxonomy of measures of thinking skills in higher education.The URCO Digest, I, 2 & 3, p. 9.
Graesser, A. & Olden, B. (2003). How does one know whether a person understands a device? The quality of questions a person asks when the device breaks down.Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 524–536.
James, M. (1987). ESL reading pedagogy: Implications of schema-theoretical research. In J. Devine, P. Carrell, & D. Eskey (Eds.),Research in Reading in English as a Second Language (pp. 177–188). Washington D.C.: TESOL.
King, A. (1991). Effects of training in strategic questioning on children’s problem-solving performance.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 307–317.
King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, & notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures.American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 303–323.
Maarof, N. (1998).Assessing second language reading. Selangor: Faculty of Language Studies, University of Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Martin, M. (1982). An investigation into self-questioning as a study technique for college developmental reading students.Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 1401.
Nurss, J., & Hough, R. (1992). Reading and the ESL student. In S. J. Samuels & A. Farstrup (Eds.),What research has to say about reading instruction (2nd ed., pp. 277- 313). Delaware: International Reading Association.
Sunga, N. (2004).A teacher’s package on the art of classroom questioning. Manila: SIBS Publishing House, Inc., Nilda Sunga, and Philippine Normal University.
Wong, B. (1985). Self-questioning instructional research: A review.Review of Educational Research, 55(2), 227- 268
Reading Selections Used in the Study:
Beyer, Lisa. (2001, October 1). Roots of rage.Time Magazine, pp. 42–44.
Cruz, I. A. (2001, October 13). Elevating our mass media.Philippine Daily Inquirer, p. 6.
US: Air Strikes Working. (2001, October 14).Philippine Daily Inquirer, p. 4.
Two graphs (Fertility Rate and Population in China) (1996, January 22)Newsweek, p.8..
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miciano, R.Z. The content and form of reader-generated questions: implications for teaching questioning strategies. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 5, 149–156 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024952
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024952