Skip to main content
Log in

The content and form of reader-generated questions: implications for teaching questioning strategies

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two classes in Developmental Reading were trained in question-formulation and were then required to ask any number and type of questions based on four texts. Three inter-raters coded the questions for their content and form. The results of the study showed the dominance of recognition or retrieval questions, suggesting the students’ proficiency in reading for details and conversely, a deficiency in critical reading. In terms of form, although 57% of the questions were coherent and grammatical, this fact alone may not indicate a high English Language proficiency. There were also many instances of the direct copying of phrases from the original text, pointing to the students’ lack of confidence or ability in summarizing and paraphrasing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andre, M., & Anderson, T. (1978-1979). The development and evaluation of a self-questioning study technique.Reading Research Quarterly, 14(4), pp. 605–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. (Ed.) (1956).Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I. Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, B., & McBride, S. (1986a). Effects of question generation training on reading comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 256–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, B., & McBride, S. (1986b). Generating self-questions after reading: A comprehension assist for elementary students.Journal of Educational Research, 80(1), 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, J. (1987). General linguistic competence and adult L2 reading. In J. Devine, P. Carrell, & D. Eskey (Eds.),Research in Reading in English as a Second Language (pp. 75–86). Washington D.C.: TESOL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, G., Roehler, L., & Herrmann, B.A. (1988). Modeling mental processes helps poor readers become strategic readers. In R. Allington (Ed.),Teaching Struggling Readers (pp. 162–167). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Asso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frase, L., & Schwartz, B. (1975). Effect of question production and answering on prose recall.Journal of Educational Psychology, 72 (5), 628–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, C. (1990). Questions about student-generated questions.Journal of Reading, 34(4), 250–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, R. (2000). Types, techniques, and taxonomy of measures of thinking skills in higher education.The URCO Digest, I, 2 & 3, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. & Olden, B. (2003). How does one know whether a person understands a device? The quality of questions a person asks when the device breaks down.Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 524–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, M. (1987). ESL reading pedagogy: Implications of schema-theoretical research. In J. Devine, P. Carrell, & D. Eskey (Eds.),Research in Reading in English as a Second Language (pp. 177–188). Washington D.C.: TESOL.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1991). Effects of training in strategic questioning on children’s problem-solving performance.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, & notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures.American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 303–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maarof, N. (1998).Assessing second language reading. Selangor: Faculty of Language Studies, University of Kebangsaan Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. (1982). An investigation into self-questioning as a study technique for college developmental reading students.Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 1401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurss, J., & Hough, R. (1992). Reading and the ESL student. In S. J. Samuels & A. Farstrup (Eds.),What research has to say about reading instruction (2nd ed., pp. 277- 313). Delaware: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunga, N. (2004).A teacher’s package on the art of classroom questioning. Manila: SIBS Publishing House, Inc., Nilda Sunga, and Philippine Normal University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, B. (1985). Self-questioning instructional research: A review.Review of Educational Research, 55(2), 227- 268

    Google Scholar 

Reading Selections Used in the Study:

  • Beyer, Lisa. (2001, October 1). Roots of rage.Time Magazine, pp. 42–44.

  • Cruz, I. A. (2001, October 13). Elevating our mass media.Philippine Daily Inquirer, p. 6.

  • US: Air Strikes Working. (2001, October 14).Philippine Daily Inquirer, p. 4.

  • Two graphs (Fertility Rate and Population in China) (1996, January 22)Newsweek, p.8..

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Remedios Z. Miciano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miciano, R.Z. The content and form of reader-generated questions: implications for teaching questioning strategies. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 5, 149–156 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024952

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024952

Key Words

Navigation