References
Banner, J.M., Preserving the integrity of peer-review,Scholarly Publishing 19 (1988), no. 2, 109–115.
Notices of the American Mathematical Society 26 (1979), 119.
Fisher, M.,et al., The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer review,Journal of the American Medical Society 272 (1994), no. 2, 143–146.
Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (1997), no. 1.
Labland, D.N., and Piette, M.J., A citation analysis of the impact of blinded peer review,Journal of the American Medical Society 272 (1994), no. 2, 147–151.
McGiffert, M., Is justice blind? An inquiry into peer-review,Scholarly Publishing 20 (1988), no. 1, 43–48.
Peters, D.P., and Ceci, S.J., Peer-review practices of psychological journals: the fate of published articles, submitted again,Behav. Brain 5 (1982), 187–195.
Shaughnessy, A.F., Comment; Blind peer review of journal articles,Drug Intelligence and Clinical Pharmacy 22 (1988), no. 12, 1006.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bourbaki, L.B. Opinion. Math Intelligencer 21, 4–5 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024823
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024823