Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lymphome gastrique de type MALT. Séméiologie échoendoscopique

MALT type gastric lymphoma. Endoscopic ultrasound semiotics

  • Published:
Acta Endoscopica

Résumé

L’ultrasonographie endoscopique est parmi toutes les techniques d’imagerie, la plus précise et la plus sensible pour la stadification locorégionale du lymphome gastrique de type MALT. Certains problèmes restent cependant posés: le manque degold standard, les discordances des données de la littérature, la nécessité d’une «définition» de la séméiologie endoscopique. La solution devrait être trouvée dans uneConférence de Consensus réunissant le plus grand nombre possible d’opérateurs.

Summary

Endoscopic ultrasonography is, amongst all the imaging techniques, the most accurate and sensitive in locoregional staging of gastric MALT lymphoma.

But yet some problems are still open: the lack of agold standard, the disagreement of the data in literature, the necessity «to set up» endoscopic ultrasound semeiotics.

The solution could be found in aConsensus Conference with the participation of as many operators of the field as possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Références

  1. ISAACSON P.G., WRIGHT D.H. — Extranodal malignant lymphoma arising from mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue.Cancer, 1984,53, 2515–2524.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. ISAACSON P.G., SPENCER J. — Malignant lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (invited review).Histopathology, 1987,11, 445–462.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. ISAACSON P.G., SPENCER J., WRIGHT D.H. — Classifying primary gut lymphomas.Lancet, 1988,2, 1148–1149.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. HARRIS N.L., JAFFE E.S., STEIN H.et al. — A revised European-American classification of lymphoid neoplasms. A proposal from the international lymphoma study group.Blood, 1994,84, 1361–1392.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. WOTHERSPOON A.C., ORTIZ-HIDALGO C., FALZON M.R.,et al. —Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis and primary B-cell gastric lymphoma.Lancet 1991,338, 1175–1176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. PARSONNET J., HANSEN S., RODRIGUEZ L.et al. —Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric lymphoma.N. Engl. J. Med., 1994,330, 1267–1271.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. BAYERDORFFER E., NEUBAUER A., RUDOLPH B.et al. — Regression of primary gastric lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue type after cure ofHelicobacter pylori infection.Lancet, 1995,345, 1591–1594.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. WEBER D.M., DIMOPOULOS M.A., ANANDU D.P.et al. — Regression of gastric lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue with antibiotic therapy forHelicobacter pylori.Gastroenterology, 1994,107, 1835–1838.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. OHASHI S., SEGAWA H., OKAMURA S.et al. — A clinicopathologic study of gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.Cancer, 2000,88, 2210–2219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. PAVLICK A.C., GERDES H., PORTLOCK C.S. — Endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of gastric small lymphocytic mucosa-associated lymphoid tumors.J. Clin. Oncol., 1997,15, 1761–1766.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. NOBRE-LEITAO C., LAGE P., CRAVO Met al. — Treatment of gastric MALT lymphoma byHelicobacter pylori eradication: a study controlled by endoscopic ultrasonography.Am. J. Gastroenterol., 1998,93, 732–736.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. SUEKANE H., IIDA M., YAO T.et al. — Endoscopic ultrasonography in primary gastric lymphoma: correlation with endoscopic and histologic findings.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1993,39, 139–145.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. PALAZZO L., ROSEAU G., RUSKONÈ-FOURMESTRAUX A.et al. — Endoscopic ultrasonography in the local staging of primary gastric lymphoma.Endoscopy, 1993,25, 502–508.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. CALETTI G., FERRARI A., BROCCHI E.et al. — Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of gastric cancer and lymphoma.Surgery, 1993,113, 14–27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. VAN DAM J. — The role of endoscopic ultrasonography in monitoring treatment: response to chemotherapy in lymphoma.Endoscopy, 1994,26, 772–773.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. CALETTI G., FUSAROLI P., TOGLIANI T.et al. — Endosonography in gastric lymphoma and large gastric folds.Eur. J. Ultrasound., 2000,11, 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. LÉVY M., HAMMEI P., LAMARQUE D.et al. — Endoscopic ultrasonography for the initial staging and follow-up in patients with low-grade gastric lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue treated medically.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1997,46, 328–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. RUSKONÈ-FOURMESTRAUX A., LAVERGNE A., AEGERTER P.H.et al. — Predictive factors for regression of gastric MALT lymphoma after anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment.Gut, 2001,48, 297–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. SACKMANN M., MORGNER A., RUDOLPH B.et al. — Regression of gastric MALT lymphoma after eradication ofHelicobacter pylori is predicted by endosonographic staging.Gastroenterology, 1997,113, 1087–1090.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. NAKAMURA S., MATSUMOTO T., SUEKANE H.et al. — Predictive value of endoscopic ultrasonography for regression of gastric low grade and high grade MALT lymphomas after eradication ofHelicobacter pylori.Gut, 2001,48, 454–460.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. MUSSHOFF K., SCHMIDT-VOLLMER H. — Prognosis of non Hodgkin’s lymphomas with special emphasis on staging classification.Z. Krebsforshung., 1975,83, 323–328.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. MENZEL J., DOMSCHKE W., BRAMBS H.J., FRANK N., HATFIELD A., NATYTERMAN C.et al. — Miniprobe ultrasonography in the upper gastrointestinal tract: state of the art 1995 and prospects.Endoscopy, 1996,28, 508–513.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. YASUDA K. — Development and clinical use of ultrasonic probes.Endoscopy, 1994,26, 816–817.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. BUSCARINI E., Di STASI M., ROSSI S., SILVA M.et al. — Endosonographic diagnosis of submucosal upper gastrointestinal tract lesions and large fold gastropathies by catheter ultrasound probe, 1999,49, 184–191.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. WAXMAN I., SAITOH Y. — Clinical outcome of endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial GI lesions and the role of high-frequency US probe sonography in an American population.Gastrointest. Endosc., 2000,52, 322–327.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. KIMMEY M.B., MARTIN R.W., HAGGITT R.C.et al. — Histologic correlatives of gastrointestinal ultrasound images.Gastroenterology, 1989,96, 433–441.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. ALPEN B., THIEDE C., WUNDISCH T.et al. — Molecular diagnostics in low-grade gastric marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue type afterHelicobacter pylori eradication therapy.Clinical. Lymphoma, 2001,2, 103–108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. TYTGAT G.N.J. — Gastric neoplasia (Lymphoma). ASGE 2002 Postgraduate Course Abstract Book, 73–76.

  29. PALMER E.D. — The sarcomas of the stomach.Am. J. Dig. Dis., 1950,17, 186–190.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. SEIFERT E., SCHULTE F., WEISMULLER J.et al. — Endoscopic and bioptic diagnosis of malignant non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the stomach.Endoscopy, 1993,25, 497–501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. TIO T.L., DEN HARTOG JAGER F.C.A., TYTGAT G.N.J. — Endoscopic ultrasonography in detection and staging of gastric non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: comparison with gastroscopy, barium meal and computerized tomography scan.Scan. J. Gastroenterol., 1986,21 (suppl 123), 52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. TIO T.L., DEN HARTOG JAGER F.C.A., TYTGAT G.N.J. — Endoscopic ultrasonography of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the stomach.Gastroenterology, 1986,91, 401–408.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. BOLONDI L., CASANOVA P., CALETTI G.C.et al. — Primary gastric lymphoma versus gastric carcinoma: endoscopic US evaluation.Radiology, 1987,165, 821–826.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. SCHUDER G., HILDEBRANDT U., KREIBLER-HAAG D.et al. — Role of endosonography in the surgical management of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the stomach.Endoscopy, 1993,25, 509–512.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. CALETTI G.C., ZANI L., BOLONDI L., GUIZZARDI G.et al. — Impact of endoscopic ultrasonography on diagnosis and treatment of primary gastric lymphoma.Surgery, 1988,103, 315–320.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. CALETTI G.C., FERRARI A., BOCUS P.et al. — Endoscopic ultrasonography in gastric lymphoma.Schweiz Med Wochenschr., 1996,126, 819–825.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. CATALANO M.F., SIVAK M.V.J.R., RICE T.et al. — Endosonographic features predictive of lymph node metastasis.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1994,40, 442–446.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. ROSCH T., CLASSEN M. — Gastroenterologic Endosonography, Gastric carcinoma. Thieme, New York, 1992, 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  39. FUJISHIMA H., MISAWA T., MARUOKA A.et al. — Staging and follow up of primary gastric lymphoma by endoscopic ultrasonography.Am. J. Gastroenterol., 1991,86, 719–724.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. FISCHBACK W., KOLVE M.E., OHMANN C. — Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in staging gastric lymphoma. Results of the German-Austrian prospective multicenter trial.Gastroenterology, 1995,108, A467 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  41. FISCHBACH W., DRAGOSICS B., KOLVE-GOEBELER M.E.et al. — Primary gastric B-cell lymphoma: results of a prospective multicenter study.Gastroenterology, 2000,119, 1191–1202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. STEINBACH G., FORD R., GLOBER G.et al. — Antibiotic treatment of gastric lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. An uncontrolled trial.Ann. Intern. Med., 1999,131, 88–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. CALETTI G.C., ZINZANI P.L., FUSAROLI P.et al. —Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther., 2002 Oct,16 (10), 1715–1722.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. FUSAROLI P., BUSCARINI E., PEYRE S., FEDERICI T., PARENTE F., DE AANGELIS C.et al. — Interobserver agreement in staging gastric MALT lymphoma by EUS.Gastrointest. Endosc., 2002,55, 662–668.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. BURTIN P., NAPOLEON B., PALAZZO L., ROSEAU G., SOUQUET J.C., CALES P. — Interobserver agreement in endoscopic ultrasonography staging of esophageal and cardia cancer.Gastrointest., Endosc., 1996,43, 20–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. BURTIN P., RABOT A.F., HERESBACH D., CARPENTIER S.et al. — Interobserver agreement in the staging of rectal cancer using endoscopic ultrasonography.Endoscopy, 1997,29, 620–625.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. RADASZKIEWICZ T., DRAGOSICS B., BAUER P. — Gastrointestinal malignant lymphomas of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue: factors relevant to prognosis.Gastroenterology, 1992,102, 1628–1638.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Medicina Generale e Specialistica, U.O. Gastroenterologia, S. Giovanni Rotondo (FG), (Italy)

    T. Federici

Authors
  1. T. Federici
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Federici, T. Lymphome gastrique de type MALT. Séméiologie échoendoscopique. Acta Endosc 33, 45–52 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03023672

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03023672

Mots-clés

Key-words

Search

Navigation