Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ponction guidée sous échoendoscopie

EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy

  • Atelier Ponctions
  • Published:
Acta Endoscopica

Conclusion

Sur le plan clinique, les ponctions pancréatiques ont un grand intérêt diagnostique. Le développement des ponctions sous échoendoscopie est lié à la mise en place de protocoles de radio-chimiothérapie pour les patients opérables ou non, porteurs d’un adénocarcinome et le développement de chimiothérapies spécifiques des tumeurs endocrines. Le matériel de ponction est précieux et le pathologiste doit tirer le maximum de renseignements, les résultats sont à discuter avec le clinicien. Un diagnostic est souvent possible, mais nécessite une interprétation rigoureuse. Les échecs sont liés à la non représentativité et aux altérations cellulaires.

Conclusion

Clinically, fine-needle biopsy of the pancreas is an important diagnostic tool. The development of EUS-guided biopsy is related to the development of radio-chemotherapy protocols for patients with operable or non-operable adenocarcinomas and to the development of specific chemotherapy regimens for endocrine tumors. The aspiration product provides precious pathological information for the clinician. The diagnosis is often possible, but is not necessarily perfectly rigorous. Diagnostic failures result from non-representative biopsies and cellular alterations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Références

  1. WIERSEMA M., VILMANN P., GIOVANNINI M., — Prospective multi-center evaluation of endosonography guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment.Gastroenterology, 1997,112, 1087–1095.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. KLOÖPPEL H., SOLCIA E., LONGNECKER D.S., CAPELLA C., SOBIN L.H. — Histological typing of tumors of the exocrine pancreas. International histological classification of tumors, 2nd ed, Berlin, Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. MONGES G., MATHOULIN-PORTIER M.P., ACRES B., HOUVENAEGHEL G., GIOVANNINI M., SEITZ J.F., BARDOU V.J., PAYAN M.J., OLIVE D. — DifferentialMuc 1 expression in normal and neoplastic human pancreatic tissue: an immunohistochemical study of 60 samples.Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 1999,112, 635–640.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. WIERSEMA M.J., HAWES R., TAO L.C., WIERSEMA L.M.et al. — Endoscopic ultrasonography as an adjunct to fine needle aspiration cytology of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1992,38, 35–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. VILMANN P., JACOBSEN G.K., HENRIKSEN F.W., HANCKE S. — Endoscopic ultrasonography with guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic disease.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1992,38, 172–173.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. GIOVANNINI M., SEITZ J.F., MONGES G., PERRIER H., RABBIA I. — Fine-needle aspiration cytology guided endoscopic ultrasonography: results in 141 patients.Endoscopy, 1995,27, 171–177.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. LERMA E., MUSULEN E., CUATRECASAS M., MARTINEZ A., MONTSERRAT E., PRAT J. — Fine needle aspiration cytology in pancreatic pathology.Acta Cytol., 1996,40, 683–686.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. MONGES G., BERNARDINI D., GIOVANNINI M. — Fine needle aspiration performed under endoscopic ultrasonography: a useful means of diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions. A series of 203 cases.Gastroenterology, 2000,118, A1513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. CENTERO B.A., PITMAN M.B. — Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy of the Pancreas. Ed. Butterworth, Heinemann, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. GIOVANNINI M., MONGES G., SEITZ J.F., MOUTARDIER V., BERNARDINI D., THOMAS P., HOUVENAEGHEL G., DELPERO J.R., GIUDICELLI R., FUENTES P. — Distant lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer: impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy.Endoscopy, 1999,31, 536–540.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. FABRE M., MONGES G., BEN LAGHA N., GIOVANNINI M., PALAZZO L., DANCOUR A., AMOUYAL P., PATRIARCHE C., BERNARDINI D., ROCHER L., NEIDHART R., PAUZE J.L., AMOUYAL G. — Paired comparaison of conventional and thin fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy. A prospective series of 42 deep masses. AIP Nice, octobre 1998.

  12. VILLANUEVA A., REYES G., CUATRECASAS M., MARTINEZ A., ERILL N., LERMA E., FARRE A., LLUIS F., CAPELLA G. — Diagnostic utility of K-ras mutations in fine-needle aspirates of pancreatic masses.Gastroenterology, 1996,110, 1587–1594.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. BARTHELEMY P., GIOVANNINI M., PALAZZO L., BOUISSON M., MONGES G., HAMMEL P., PRADAYROL L., RUSZNIEWSKI P., VAYSSE N. —Endoscopy, 2000,32, A07.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232, bd Sainte-Marguerite, BP 156, 13273, Marseille Cedex 9, France

    Geneviève Monges

Authors
  1. Geneviève Monges
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Monges, G. Ponction guidée sous échoendoscopie. Acta Endosc 31, 31–36 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03023649

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03023649

Mots-clés

Key-words

Search

Navigation