Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Davidson LA. The end of print: digitization and its consequence--revolutionary changes in scholarly and social communication and in scientific research. Int J Toxicol 2005; 24: 25–34.
Frank M. Access to the scientific literature-a difficult balance. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1552–5.
Sperr EV Jr. Libraries and the future of scholarly communication. Mol Cancer 2006; Nov 7 5: 58. Available from URL; (http://www.molecular-cancer.com/con-tent/5/1/58).
Albert KM. Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries. J Med Libr Assoc 2006; 94: 253–62.
Chang AA, Heskett KM, Davidson TM. Searching the literature using medical subject headings versus text word with PubMed. Laryngoscope 2006; 116: 336–40.
Vincent B, Vincent M, Ferreira CG. Making PubMed searching simple: learning to retrieve medical literature through interactive problem solving. Oncologist 2006; 11: 243–51. Available from URL; (http://theoncolo-gist.alphamedpress.org/cgi/content/full/1 1/3/243).
Vanhecke TE, Barnes MA, Zimmerman J, Shoichet S. PubMed vs. HighWire Press: a head-to-head comparison of two medical literature search engines. Comput Biol Med 2006 Dec 19; [Epub ahead of print].
Farrell A. Getting the picture: medical images on the Web. Med Ref Serv Q 2006; 25: 47–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Support was provided solely from institutional and/or departmental sources. The author has no financial relationship with any products, devices or drugs mentioned in this report.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doyle, D.J. Search engines for scholarly research: A brief update for clinicians. Can J Anesth 54, 336–341 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03022654
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03022654