Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pancréatite aiguë compliquant la cholanglo-pancréatographie rétrograde endoscopique (CPRE) et la ponction dirigée sous échoendoscopie

  • Prévention et Prise en Charge des Complications en Endoscopie Digestive
  • Published:
Acta Endoscopica

Conclusion

La pancréatite aiguë est une préoccupation importante pour les endoscopistes qu’ils soient cathétériseurs ou échoendoscopistes, en raison de la gravité potentielle de cette complication. La fréquence et la sévérité de cette complication impose une information éclairée du patient. Certains facteurs de risque sont désormais bien établis et permettent de mettre en œuvre une prévention efficace. Néanmoins, l’absence de chimioprophylaxie efficace se fait toujours cruellement sentir, particulièrement dans certaines indications à risque élevé et un effort de recherche doit être effectué dans ce sens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. FURNET J., DHUMEAUX D. — L’endoscopieIn Le Livre Blanc de l’hépato-gastroentérologie, p. 155–157, Masson eds 2001.

  2. HEYRIES L., BARTHET M., MIRANDA C., BERNARD J.P., SAHEL J. — Intubation pancréatique perendoscopique dans la pancréatite chronique: à propos de 70 cas.Gastroentérol. Clin. Biol., 1999,23, 469–474.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. NEOPTOLEMOS J.P., CARR-LOCKE D.L., LONDON N.J., BAILEY I.A., JAMES D., FOSSARD D.P. — Controlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomyversus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones.Lancet, 1988,2, 979–983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. FAN S.T., LAI E.C.S., MOK F.P.T., LO C.M., ZHENG S.S., WONG J. — Early treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis by endoscopic papillotom.N. Engl. J. Med., 1993,328, 228–232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. FOLSCH U.R., NITSCHE R., LUDTKE R., HILGERS R.A., CREUTZFELDT W. and the German study group on acute biliary pancreatitis — Early ERCP and papillotomy compared with conservative treatment for acute biliary pancretitis.N. Engl. J. Med., 1997,336, 237–242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. BERDAH S., ORSONI P., BEGE T., BARTHET M., GRIMAUD J.C., PICAUD R. — Follow-up of selective endoscopic ultrasonography and/or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study of 300 patients.Endoscopy, 2001,33, 216–220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. SUC B., ESCAT J., CHERQUI D., FOURTANIER G., HAY J.M., FINGERHUT A. — Surgery vs Endoscopy as primary treatment in symptomatic patients with suspected common bile duct stones.Arch. Surg., 1998,133, 702–708.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. FREEMAN M., NELSON D., SHERMAN S., HABER G.B., HERMAN M.E., DORSHER P.J.,et al. — Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.N. Engl. J. Med., 1996,335, 909–918.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. LOPERFIDO S., ANGELINI G., BENEDETTI G., CHILOVI F., COSTAN F., DE BERARDINIS F.et al. — Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1998,48, 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. MASCI E., TOTI G., MARIANI Aet al. — Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.Am. J. Gastroenterol., 2001,96, 417–423.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. CAVALLINI G., TITTOBELLO A., FRULLONI L., MASCI E., MARIANI A., DI FRANCESCO V.et al. — Gabexate for the prevention of pancreatic damage related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.N. Engl. J. Med., 1996,335, 919–923.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. ANDRIULLI A., LEANDRO G., NIRO G., MANGIA A., FESTA V., GAMBASSI G.et al. — Pharmacologic treatment can prevent pancreatic injury after ERCP: a meta-analysis.Gastrointest. Endosc., 2000,51, 1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. DEVIERE J., Le MOINE O., VAN LAETHEM J.L., EISENDRATH P., GHILAIN A., SEVERS N.et al. — Interleukin 10 reduces the incidence of pancreatitis after therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Gastroenterology, 2001,120, 498–505.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. COTTON P.B., LEHMAN G.A., VENNES J., GEENEN J.E., RUSSEL R.C.G., MEYERS W.C.et al. — Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1991,37, 388–393.

    Google Scholar 

  15. COTTON P.B. — Outcomes of endoscopy procedures: struggling towards definitions.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1994,40, 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  16. FREEMAN M.L., DI SARIO J.A., NELSON D.B., FENNERTY B., LEE J.G., BJORKMANN D.J.et al. — Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study.Gastrointest. Endosc., 2001,54, 425–434.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. TRAP R., ADAMSEN S., HART-HANSEN O., HENRIKSEN M. — Severe and fatal complications after diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective series of claims to insurance covering public hospitals.Endoscopy, 1999,31, 125–130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. BARTHET M., LESAVRE N., DESJEUX A., GASMI M., BERTHEZENE P., BERDAH S.et al. — Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: results from a single tertiary referral center.Endoscopy, 2002, sous presse.

  19. TARNASKY P.R., PLESH Y.Y., CUNNINGHAZM J.T., MAULDIN P.P., CTTON P.B., HAWES R.H. — Pancreatic stenting prevents pancreatitis after biliary sphincterotomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.Gastroenterology, 1999, 115,27, 638–644.

    Google Scholar 

  20. BERGMAN J.J., RAUWS E.A., FOCKENS P., VAN BERKEL A.M., BOSSUYT P.M., TIJSSEN J.G.et al. — Randomized trial balloon dilationversus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones.Lancet, 1997,349, 1124–1129.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. BERGMAN J.J., HUIGREGTSE K. — What is the current status of endoscopic balloon dilation for stone removal?Endoscopy, 1998,30, 43–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. SHERMAN S., HAWES H.L., RATHGABER S.W., UZER M.F., SMITH M.T., KHUSRO Q.E.et al. — Post-ERCP pancreatitis: randomized prospective study comparing a low and high osmolarity contrast agent.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1994,40, 422–427.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. JOHNSON G.K., GEENEN J.E., JOHANSON J., SHERMAN S., HOGAN W.J., CASS O. — Evaluation of post-ERCP pancreatitis: potential causes noted during controlled study of different contrast media.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1997,46, 217–222.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. JOHNSON G.K., GEENEN J.E., BEDFORD R.A., JOHANSON J., CASS O., SHERMAN S.et al. — A comparison of nonionicversus ionic contrast media: results of a prospective multicenter study.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1995,42, 312–316.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. HASTIER P. — Can post-ERCP acute pancreatitis be predicted and prevented?Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol., 2001,25, 1S140–1S150.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. HASTIER P., BUCKLEY M.J., PETEN E.P., DEMUTH N., DUMAS R., DEMARQUAY J.F.et al. — A new source of drug-induced pancreatitis: codeine.Am. J. Gastroenterol., 2000,95, 3295–3298.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. SMITHIES A.M., SARGEN K., DEMAINE A.G., KINGSNORTH A.N. — Investigation of the interleukine 1 gene cluster and its association with acute pancreatitis.Pancreas, 2000,30, 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. ANDRIULLI A., LEANDRO G., NIRO G., MANGIA A., FESTA V., GAMBASSI G.et al. — Pharmacologic treatment can prevent pancreatic injury after ERCP: a meta-analysis.Gastrointest. Endosc., 2000,51, 1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. BORDAS J.M., TOLEDO-PIMENTEL V., LLACH J., ELENA M., MONDELO F., GINES A.et al. — Effects of bolus somatostatin in preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic pancreatography: results of a randomized study.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1998,47, 230–234.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. POON R.T.P., YEUNG C., LO C.M., YUEN W.K., LIU C.L., FAN S.T. — Prophylactic effect of somatostatin on post-ERCP pancreatitis: a randomized controlled trial.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1999,49, 593–598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. HUANG J., PADBURY R.T.A., SCHLOITHE A.C., COX M.R., SIMULA M.E., HARVEY J.R.et al. — Somatostatin stimulates the brush-tailed possum sphincter of Oddiin vitro and in vivo.Gastroenterology, 1998,115, 672–679.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. TESTONI P.A., LELLA F., BAGNOLO F., CAPORUSCIO S., CATTANI L., COLOMBO E.et al. — Long term prophylactic administration of octreotide reduces the rise in serum amylase after endoscopic procedures on Vater’s papilla.Pancreas, 1996,13, 61–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. STERNLIEB J.M., ARONCHIK C.A., RETIG J.N., DABEZIES M., SAUNDERS F., GOOSENHERG E.et al. — A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the effect of prophylactic octreotide on ERCP-induced pancreatitis.Am. J. Gastroenterol., 1992,97, 1561–1566.

    Google Scholar 

  34. RABENSTEIN T., SCHNEIDER H.R., NICKLAS M., KATALINIC A., HAHN E.G., MARTUS P.et al. — Analysis of the risk factors associated with the endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques.Endoscopy, 2000,32, 10–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. FOGEL E.L., EVERSMAN D., JAMIDAR P., SHERMAN S., LEHMAN G. — Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: pancreaticobiliary sphincterotomy with pancreatic stent placement has a lower rate of pancreatitis than biliary sphincterotomy alone.Endoscopy, 2002,34, 280–285.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. WIERSEMA M.J., VILMANN P., GIOVANNINNI M., CHANG K.J., WIERSEMA L.M. — Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment.Gastroenterology, 1997,112, 1087–1095.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. O’TOOLE D., PALAZZO L., AROTÇARENA R., DANCOUR A., AUBERT A., HAMMEL P., AMARIS J., RUSZNIEWSKI P. —Gastrointest. Endosc., 2001,53, 470–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. BINMOELLER K.F., BRAND B., THUL R., RATHOD V., SOEHENDRA N. — EUS-guided, fine-needle aspiration biopsy using a new mechanical scanning puncture echoendoscope.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1998,47, 335–340.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. HOLLERBACH S., KLAMMAN A., TOPALIDIS T., SCHMIEGEL W.H. — EUS and fine-needle aspiration cytology for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.Endoscopy, 2001,33, 824–831.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. VOSS M., HAMMEL P., MOLAS G., PALAZO L., DANCOURT A., O’TOOLE D.et al. — Diagnosis value of fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumours.Gut, 2000,46, 244–249.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hôpital Nord, (Marseille)

    M. Barthet

Authors
  1. M. Barthet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Barthet, M. Pancréatite aiguë compliquant la cholanglo-pancréatographie rétrograde endoscopique (CPRE) et la ponction dirigée sous échoendoscopie. Acta Endosc 32 (Suppl 2), 511–515 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03020309

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03020309

Search

Navigation