Abstract
The slow or total lack of decrease in some autonomic responses during extinction in aversive conditioning and concomitant verbalizations of fear have remained a problem for learning theories and psychophysiology. Removal of the aversive stimulus should result in a rapid decrement in responding, as it does in cognitive and somatic systems. In laboratory analogues of phobia and clinical neurosis, however, such decreases do not occur in some autonomic responses and reported fear. In this article three areas of research are presented in which dissociations occur between cognitive and autonomie responses: 1) relational learning, 2) phobia, and 3) incubation. The data indicate that there are some important distinctions to be made concerning the properties of different psychological and physiological systems. These distinctions pertain to the differences between cognitive and noncognitive systems, between the two branches of the ANS, and between acquisition and extinction processes. These distinctions lead to a number of hypotheses concerning dissociations between response systems and have important implications for the understanding and treatment of neurosis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong, D. M.Belief, Truth and Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
Champion, R. A., and Jones, J. E. Drive level (D) and extinction in classical aversive conditioning.The Journal of General Psychology, 1962,67, 61–37.
Dawson, M. E. Can classical conditioning occur without contingency learning? A review and evaluation of the evidence.Psychophysiology, 1973,10, 82–86.
Dawson, M. E., and Furedy, J. J. The role of awareness in human differential autonomic classical conditioning: the necessary gate hypothesis.Psychophysiology, 1976,13, 50–53.
Fredrikson, M. Conditioning, phobias, and psychophysiological measures.Acta Universitatis Upsaliensias, Abstract of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Social Sciences No.19, 1980.
Fredrikson, M. Orienting and defensive reaction to phobic and conditioned fear stimuli in phobics and normals.Psychophysiology, 1981,18, 456–465.
Fredrikson, M., and Öhman, A. Cardiovascular and electrodermal responses conditioned to fear-relevant stimuli.Psychophysiology, 1979,16, 1–7.
Fuhrer, M. J., and Baer, P. E. Differential classical conditioning: Verbalisation of stimulus contingencies.Science, 1965,150, 1479–1481.
Furedy, J. J. Explicitly unpaired and truly random CScontrols in human classical differential autonomic conditioning.Psychophysiology, 1971,8, 497–503.
Furedy, J. J. Some limits of the cognitive control of conditioned autonomie behavior.Psychophysiology, 1973,10, 108–111.
Furedy, J. J. Experimental assessments of the importance of controlling for contingency factors in human classical differential electrodermal and plethysmographic conditioning.Psychophysiology, 1974,11, 308–314.
Furedy, J. J. Cognition is bodily: But cognition is what? Review of F. J. McGuigan’sCognitive Psychophysiology. Contemporary Psychology, 1980,25, 10–11.
Furedy, J. J., and Schiffman, K. Test of the propriety of the traditional discriminative control procedure in Pavlovian electrodermal and plethysmographic conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,91, 161–164.
Furedy, J. J., and Schiffman, K. Concurrent measurement of autonomie and cognitive processes in a test of the traditional discriminative control procedure for Pavlovian electrodermal conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,100, 210–217.
Furedy, J. J., and Schiffmann, K. Interrelationships between human classical differential electrodermal conditioning, orienting reaction, responsivity, and awareness of stimulus contingencies.Psychophysiology, 1974,11, 58–67.
Furedy, J. J., and Thiels, E.Short interval backward autonomie conditioning revisited: Dissociations between autonomie and cognitive performance. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychophysiology Society, London, December, 1981.
Furedy, J. J., Arabian, J. M., Thiels, E., and George, L. Direct and continuous measurement of relational learning in human Pavlovian conditioning.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 1982,17, 69–79.
Garcia, J., and Koelling, R. Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning.Psychonomic Science, 1966,4, 123–124.
Gray, J. A.Elements of a Two-process Theory of Learning. London: Academic Press, 1975.
Hare, R. D., and Blevings, G. Conditioned orienting and defensive responses.Psychophysiology, 1975,12, 289–297.
Hugdahl, K., and Öhman, A. Effects of instruction on acquisition and extinction of electrodermal responses to potentially phobic stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 608–618.
Jones, J. E. Contiguity and reinforcement in relation to CS-UCS intervals in classical aversive conditioning.Psychological Review, 1962,69, 176–186.
Kamin, L. J. Temporal and intensity characteristics of the conditioned stimulus. In W. F. Prokasy (Ed.),Classical Conditioning: A Symposium. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965.
Kimble, G. A.Hilgard and Marquis’ Conditioning and Learning. 2nd Ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1961.
Lacey, A. R.A Dictionary of Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1976.
Leitenberg, H. Behavioral approaches to treatment of neuroses. In H. Leitenberg (Ed.),Handbook of Behavior Therapy and Behavior Modification. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1976.
Mackintosh, N. J. Stimulus selection: learning to ignore stimuli that predict no change in reinforcement. In R. A. Hinde, and J. T. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.),Constraints on Learning. London: Academic Press, 1973.
Marks, I. M.Fears and Phobias. London: Heineman, 1969.
Obrist, P. A.Cardiovascular Psychophysiology: A Perspective. New York: Plenum Press, 1981.
Öhman, A. The orienting response, attention and learning: an information-processing perspective. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. van Olst, and J. F. Orlebeke (Eds.),The Orienting Reflex in Humans. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1979.
Öhman, A., Fredrikson, M., and Hugdahl, K. Towards an experimental model for simple phobic reactions.Behavioural Analysis and Modification, 1978,2, 97–114.
Prokasy, W. F. Classical eyelid conditioning: experimenter operations, task demands, and response shaping. In W. F. Prokasy (Ed.),Classical Conditioning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965.
Rachman, S. The primacy of affect: Some theoretical implications.Behaviour Research & Therapy, 1981,19, 279–290.
Rescorla, R. A. Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.Psychological Review, 1967,74, 71–80.
Rescorla, R. A., and Wagner, A. R. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. Black, and W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical Conditioning II. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.
Riley, D. M., and Furedy, J. J. Reply to Mulholland. In L. White, and B. Tursky (Eds.),Clinical Biofeedback: Efficacy and Mechanisms. New York: Guilford Press, 1982.
Ritchie, B. H. Concerning an incurable vagueness in psychological theories. In B. B. Wolman, and E. Nagle (Eds.),Scientific psychology: Principles and approaches. New York: Basic Books, 1965
Schiffmann, K., and Furedy, J. J. Failures of contingency and cognitive factors to affect long-interval differential Pavlovian autonomic conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,96, 215–218.
Schiffmann, K., and Furedy, J. J. The effect of CS-US contingency variation on GSR and on subjective CS-US relational awareness.Memory and Cognition, 1977,5, 273–277.
Segal, E. M., and Lachman, R. Complex behavior or higher mental process: is there a paradigm shift?American Psychologist, 1972,27, 46–55.
Siddle, D. A. T., and Spinks, J. A. The orienting response and information processing: some theoretical and empirical problems. In H. D. Kimmel, E.H. van Olst, and J. F. Orlebeke (Eds.),The Orienting Reflex in Humans. Hillsdale, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1979.
Szalai, J. P., and Furedy, J. J. Is the effective tilt US onset merely coy and elusive or should we welcome back backward conditioning—Pavlov’s prodigal son?Psychophysiology, 1978,15, 272 (Abstract).
Westregren, B., and Furedy, J. J. Importance of the instructed eye-movement component of the complex imaginational CS in Pavlovian conditioning of cardiac function with negative tilt as US.Psychophysiology, 1978,15, 266 (Abstract).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Furedy, J.J., Riley, D.M. & Fredrikson, M. Pavlovian extinction, phobias, and the limits of the cognitive paradigm. Pav. J. Biol. Sci. 18, 126–135 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03019162
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03019162