Skip to main content
Log in

Place de la coloscople virtuelle dans le dépistage du cancer colorectal

Usefulness of virtual colonoscopy in colorectal cancer detection

  • Published:
Acta Endoscopica

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. BENHAMICHE A.M. — Cancer du côlon: épidémiologie descriptive et groupes à risque élevé.Gastroentérol. Clin. Biol., 1998,22, S3-S11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Société Nationale Française de Gastroentérologie, Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte contre le Cancer Agence Nationale d'Accréditation et d'Évaluation en Santé. Prévention, dépistage et prise en charge des cancers du côlon. Conférence de consensus. Paris, 29 et 30 janvier.Gastroentérol. Clin. Biol., 1998,22 S1-S295.

    Google Scholar 

  3. GILLOT D. — Le Programme cancer du Cercle. Discours de Madame Dominique Gillot, Secrétaire d'État à la Santé et aux Handicapés. Vendredi 14 avril 2000. Assemblée Nationale. Available from: URL: http://ww sante gouv fr/htm/actu/ 33_000414_b.htm.

  4. BRETAGNE J., FAIVRE J. — La Société Française de Gastro-Entérologie recommande la mise en place d'un dépistage généralisé et organisé du cancer colorectal en France.Gastroentérol. Clin. Biol., 2000,24, 492–493.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cancer colorectal. De bonnes raisons pour mettre en oeuvre les dépistages.Prescrire, 1998,18, 609–623.

    Google Scholar 

  6. SCHAFFER P. — Les conditions nécessaires à la réalisation d'un programme de dépistage.Gastroentérol. Clin. Biol., 1998,22, S28-S33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. WINAWER S.J., FLETCHER R.H., MILLER L. GODLEE F., STOLAR M.H., MULROW C.D.et al. — Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale.Gastroenterology, 1997,112, 594–642.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. WINAWER S.J., STEWART E.T., ZAUBER A.G., BOND J.H., ANSEL H., WAYE J.D.et al. — A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy.New Engl. J. Med., 2000,342, 1766–1772.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. THIIS-EVENSEN E., HOFF G.S., SAUAR J., LANGMARK F., MAJAK B.M., VATN M.H. — Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study 1.Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 1999,34, 414–420.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. KRONBORG O. — Colon polyps and cancer. State-of-the-art review.Endoscopy, 2000,32, 124–130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. RAYMOND J.M., TISSOT B., DARTIGUES J.F., CAPDENAT SAINT-MARTIN E. VERGIER J.F., MICHEL P.et al. — Qualité des coloscopies réalisées en pratique courante dans la région Aquitaine.Gastroentérol. Clin. Biol., 199418, 310–316.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. BYRD R.L., BOGGS H.W., SLAGE G.W., COLE P.A. — Reliability of colonoscopy.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1989,32, 1023–1025.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. WARNEKE J., PETRELLI N., HERRERA L., NAVA H. — Accuracy of colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1992,35, 981–985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive La coloscopie en France en 1998. Résultat d'une enquête prospective nationale de la SFED. Lettre de la SFED, 2000,8, 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  15. HUMEAU B., CASTEUBLE D., CHARIFI M., DANIELOU, Y., EMPINET O., FROCRAIN Y.et al. — Complications de la coloscopie: résultats d'une étude prospective de 18 mois. Paris: SNFGE, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. PARIENTE A., MILAN C., LAFON J., FAIVRE J. — Colonoscopic screening in first-degree relatives of patients with “sporadic” colorectal cancer: a case control study.Gastroenterology, 1998,115, 7–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. GUILLEN J.G., FORDE K.A., TREAT M.R. NEUGUT A.I., O'TOOLE K.M., DIAMOND B.E. — Colonoscopic screening for neoplasms in asymptomatic first-degree relatives of colon cancer patients. A controlled, prospective study.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1992,35, 523–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. SAUAR J., HOFF G., HAUSKEN T., BJORKHEIM A., FOERSTER A., MOWINCKEL P. — Colonoscopic screening examination of relatives of patients with colorectal cancer: 2. Relations between tumour characteristics and the presence of polyps.Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 1992,27, 667–672.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. HARDCASTLE J.D., CHAMBERLAIN J.O., ROBINSON M.H., MOSS S.M., AMAR S.S., BALFOUR T.W.et al. — Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.Lancet, 1996,348, 1472–1477.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. KRONBORG O., FENGER C., OLSEN J., JORGENSEN O., SONDERGAARD O. — Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test.Lancet, 1996,348, 1467–1471.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. MANDEL J.S., BOND J.H., CHURCH T.R., SNOVER D.C., BRADLEY G.M., SCHUMAN L.M.et al. — Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood.New Engl. J. Med., 1993,328, 1365–1371.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. MANDEL J.S., CHURCH T.R., EDERER F., BOND J.H. — Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood.J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 1999,91, 434–437.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. FAIVRE J., TAZI M.A., MILAN C., LEJEUNE C., DURAND G., LAMOUR J. — Controlled trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer in Burgundy (France). Results of the first 9 years [abstract].Gastroenterology, 1999,116, A400.

    Google Scholar 

  24. VINING D.J., GELFAND D.W., BECHTOLD R.E., SCHARLING E.S., GRISHAW E.K., SHIFRIN R.Y. — Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality [abstract].Am. J. Roentgenol., 1994,162, 104.

    Google Scholar 

  25. FENLON H.M., NUNES D.P., CLARKE P.D., FERRUCCI J.T. — Colorectal neoplasm detection using virtual colonoscopy: a feasibility study.Gut, 1998,43, 806–811.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. JOHNSON C.D., DACHMAN A.H. — CT colonography: the next colon screening examination?Radiology, 2000,216, 331–341.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. MACARI M., BERMAN P., DICKER M., MILANO A., MEGIBOW A.J. — Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy.Am. J. Roentgenol., 1999,173, 561–564.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. MORRIN M.M., KRUSKAL J.B., FARRELL R.J. GOLDBERG, S.N., McGEE J.B., RAPTOPOULOS V. — Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy.Am. J. Roentgenol., 1999,172, 913–918.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. FENLON H.M., McANENY D.B., NUNES D.P., CLARKE P.D., FERRUCCI J.T. — Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon.Radiology, 1999,210, 423–428.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. ROYSTER A.P., FENLON H.M., CLARKE P.D., NUNES D.P., FERRUCCI J.T. — CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation.Am. J. Roentgenol., 1997,169, 1237–1242.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. MORRA A., MEDURI S., AMMAR L., UKMAR M., POZZI MUCELI R. — CT colonoscopy with volume rendering. Results and comparison with endoscopy and surgery.Radiol. Med. (Torino), 1999,98, 162–167.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. HARA A.K., JOHNSON C.D., REED J.E., AHLQUIST D.A., NELSON H., EHMAN R.L.et al. — Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colonography: feasibility of a novel technique.Gastroenterology, 1996,110, 284–290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. HARA A.K., JOHNSON C.D., REED J.E., AHLQUIST D.A., NELSON H., MacCARTY R.L.et al. —Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colonography: initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity.Radiology, 1997,205, 59–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. DACHMAN A.H., KUNIYOSHI J.K., BOYLE C.M., SAMARA Y., HOFFMANN K.R., RUBIN D.T.et al. — CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps.Am. J. Roentgenol., 1998,171, 989–995.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. PESCATORE P., GLÜCKER T., DELARIVE J., MEULI R., PANTOFLICKOVA D., DUVOISIN B.et al. — Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy).Gut, 2000,47, 126–130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. BETHGE N., BREITKREUTZ C., HARMS S. NEUKOLLN K., VAKIL N. — Prospective, controlled, doubleblinded trial of virtual colonoscopy in occult Of bleeding [abstract].Gastroenterology, 1999,116, A378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. REX D.K., VINING D., KOPECKY K.K. — An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy).Gastrointest. Endosc., 1999,50, 309–313.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. FENLON H.M., NUNES D.P., SCHROY P.C., BARISH M.A., CLARKE P.D., FERRUCCI J.T. — A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.N. Engl. J. Med., 1999,341, 1496–1503.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. KAY C.L., KULLING D., HAWES R.H., YOUNG J.W., COTTON P.B. — Virtual endoscopy: comparison with colonoscopy in the detection of space-occupying lesions of the colon.Endoscopy, 2000,32, 226–232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. HIXSON L.J., FENNERTY M.B., SAMPLINER R.E., GAREWAL H.S. — Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps.Gastrointest. Endosc., 1991, 37, 125–127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. REX D.K., CUTLER C.S., LEMMEL G.T., RAHMANI E.Y., CLARK D.W., HELPER D.J.et al. — Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.Gastroenterology, 1997,112, 24–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. MACARI M., MILANO A., LAVELLE M., BERMAN P., MEGIBOW A.J. — Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two-and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps.Am. J. Roentgenol., 2000,174, 1543–1549.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. JOHNSON C.D., AHLQUIST D.A. — Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a new method for colorectal screening.Gut. 1999,44, 301–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. McFARLAND E.G., BRINK J.A. — Helical CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). The challenge that exists between advancing technology and generalizability.Am. J. Roentgenol., 1999,173, 549–559.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. HARA A.K., JOHNSON C.D., REED J.E., AHLQUIST D.A., NELSON H., EHMAN R.L.et al. — Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography.Am. J. Roentgenol., 1997,168, 1181–1184.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Phosphates de sodium. Des risques chez certains patients.Prescrire, 2000,20, 182–185.

    Google Scholar 

  47. AKERKAR G.A., HUNG R.K., YEE J., TERDIMAN J.P., McQUAID K.R. — Virtual colonoscopy: real pain [abstract].Gastroenterology, 1999,116, A44.

    Google Scholar 

  48. FORBES G.M., MENDELSON R.M. — Patients acceptance of virtual colonoscopy.Endoscopy, 2000,32, 274–275.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. SONNENBERG A., DELCÒ F., BAUERFEIND P. — Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer?Am J. Gastroenterol., 1999,94, 2268–2274.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. REX D.K. — Virtual colonoscopy: time for some tough questions for radiologists and gastroenterologists.Endoscopy, 2000, 32, 260–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. REX D.K. — Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication.Am. J. Gastroenterol., 1995,90, 353–365.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. FLETCHER J.G., JOHNSON C.D., WELCH T.J., MacCARTY R.L., AHLQUIST D.A., REED J.E.et al. — Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients.Radiology, 2000,216, 704–711.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. NAUS M., KHANDELWAL M., ROWE W., MUTH E. WEAVER J. — Prospective comparison of virtual colonoscopy to conventional colonoscopy in the detection of polyps [abstract].Gastrointest. Endosc., 1997,45, AB113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. PINEAU B.C., MIKULANINEC C., VINING D.J. — Ability of virtual colonoscopy to detect patients with colorectal polyps [abstract].Gastroenterology, 1999,116, A485.

    Google Scholar 

  55. AKERKAR G., HUNG R., YEE J., TERDIMAN J., BAIDOO L., McQUAID K. — Sensitivity and specificity of virtual colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia (abstract).Gastroenterology, 1999,116, A44.

    Google Scholar 

  56. YEE J., HUNG R.K., STEINAUER-GEBAUER A.M. — Prospective comparison of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colorectal polyp detection [abstract].Radiology, 1999,213, 340.

    Google Scholar 

  57. SCHMUTZ G.R., HUE S., CHEN D., FOURNIER L., LEPROUX F., LEPENNEC A. — Contribution of automated path planning in virtual colonoscopy [abstract].Radiology, 1999,213, 258.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Sèrvice évaluation des technologies, ANAES

Service évaluation économique, ANAES

About this article

Cite this article

Vitry, A., Corbillon, E. & Poullié, AI. Place de la coloscople virtuelle dans le dépistage du cancer colorectal. Acta Endosc 32, 665–681 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03018874

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03018874

Navigation