Skip to main content

Intravenous lidocaine and ephedrine, but not propofol, suppress fentanyl-induced cough

L’administration iv de lidocaïne et d’éphédrine, mais non de propofol, supprime la toux causée par le fentanyl

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of lidocaine, propofol and ephedrine in suppressing fentanyl-induced cough.

Methods

One hundred and eighteen patients were randomly assigned into four groups and the following medications were given intravenously: patients in Group I (n = 31) received normal saline 2 mL, Group II (n = 29) received lidocaine 2 mg · kg−1, Group III (n = 30) received propofol 0.6 mg · kg−1 and Group IV (n = 28) received ephedrine 5 mg. At one minute after the study medication, fentanyl 2.5 μg · kg−1 was given intravenously within two seconds. The occurrence of cough and vital sign profiles were recorded within two minutes after fentanyl bolus by an anesthesiologist blinded to study design.

Results

Sixty-five percent of patients in the placebo group had cough, whereas the frequency was significantly decreased in Groups II(14%) and IV (21%). Although a numerically lower frequency of cough was noted in Group III (37%), it was not statistically different from that of the placebo group. SpO2 decreased significantly in patients of Group III compared to placebo; one patient experienced hypoxemia necessitating mask ventilation. Patients in Group III showed a decrease in heart rate and systolic blood pressure (2 beats · min−1 and 8 mmHg vs baseline). Patients in Group IV showed an increase in both measurements (5 beats · min−1 and 8 mmHg vs baseline). No truncal rigidity was observed throughout the study.

Conclusions

Intravenous lidocaine 2 mg · kg−1 or ephedrine 5 mg, but not propofol 0.6 mg · kg−1, was effective in preventing fentanyl-induced cough. The results provide a convenient method to decrease fentanyl-induced cough.

Résumé

Objectif

Évaluer l’efficacité de la lidocaïne, du propofol et de l’éphédrine dans la suppression de la toux induite par le fentanyl.

Méthode

Cent dix-huit patients ont été répartis au hasard en quatre groupes et ont reçu: Groupe l (n = 31), 2 mL de solution saline; Groupe II (n = 29), 2mg · kg−1de lidocaïne; Groupe III (n = 30), 0,6 mg · kg−1 de propofol et Groupe IV (n = 28), 5 mg d’éphédrine. À une minute après la médication expérimentale, 2,5 μg · kg−1 de fentanyl iv ont été administrés en moins de deux secondes. L’occurrence de toux et les profils des signes vitaux ont été enregistrés par un anesthésiologiste impartial pendant les deux minutes qui ont suivi l’administration de bolus de fentanyl.

Résultats

Soixante-cinq pour cent des patients du groupe placebo ont eu de la toux, tandis que la fréquence a significativement diminué dans les Groupes II (14 %) et IV (21 %). Même si une fréquence de toux numériquement plus basse a été notée dans le Groupe III, elle n’était pas statistiquement différente de celle du groupe placebo. La SpO2 a diminué significativement chez les patients du Groupe III comparé au groupe placebo; un patient a présenté de l’hypoxémie nécessitant une ventilation au masque. Les patients du Groupe III ont subi une baisse de la fréquence cardiaque et de la tension artérielle systolique (2 battements · min−1 et 8 mmHg vs les mesures de base). Ceux du Groupe IV ont présenté une augmentation de ces deux paramètres (5 battements · min−1 et 8 mmHg vs les mesures de base). Aucune rigidité tronculaire n’a été observée pendant l’étude.

Conclusion

L’administration iv de 2 mg · kg−1 de lidocaïne ou de 5 mg d’éphédrine, mais non de 0,6 mg · kg−1 de propofol, a été efficace pour prévenir la toux induite par le fentanyl. Les résultats offrent une méthode pratique de diminuer la toux induite par le fentanyl.

References

  1. Bohrer H, Fleischer F, Werning P. Tussive effect of a fentanyl bolus administered through a central venous catheter. Anaesthesia 1990; 45: 18–21.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Phua WT, Teh BT, Jong W, Lee TL, Tweed WA. Tussive effect of a fentanyl bolus. Can J Anaesth 1991; 38: 330–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lui PW, Hsing CH, Chu YC. Terbutaline inhalation suppresses fentanyl-induced coughing. Can J Anaesth 1996; 43: 1216–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Agarwal A, Azim A, Ambesh S, et al. Salbutamol, beclomethasone or sodium chromoglycate suppress coughing induced by iv fentanyl. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 297–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tweed WA, Dakin D. Explosive coughing after bolus fentanyl injection. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 1442–3.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Poulton TJ, James FM 3rd. Cough suppression by lidocaine. Anesthesiology 1979; 50: 470–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cigarini I, Bonnet F, Lorino AM, Harf A, Desmonts JM. Comparison of the effects of fentanyl on respiratory mechanics under propofol or thiopental anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1990; 34: 253–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reitan JA, Stengen KB, Wymore ML, Martucci RW. Central vagal control of fentanyl-induced bradycardia during halothane anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1978; 57: 31–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lnoue K, Samodelov LF, Arndt JO. Fentanyl activates a particular population of vagal efferents which are cardioinhibitory. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg Arch Pharmacol 1980; 312: 57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Paintal AS. Mechanism of stimulation of type J pulmonary receptors. J Physiol 1969; 203: 511–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Karlsson JA, Sant’Ambrogio G, Widdicombe J. Afferent neural pathways in cough and reflex bronchoconstriction. J Appl Physiol 1988; 65: 1007–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vidruk EH, Hahn HL, Nadel JA, Sampson SR. Mechanisms by which histamine stimulates rapidly adapting receptors in dog lungs. J Appl Physiol 1977; 43: 397–402.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lou YP. Regulation of neuropeptide release from pulmonary capsaicin-sensitive afferents in relation to bronchoconstriction. Acta Physiol Scand 1993; 62(Suppl 612): 1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tasuda L, Hirano T, Yusa T, Satoh M. Tracheal constriction by morphine and by fentanyl in man. Anesthesiology 1978; 49: 117–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Benthuysen JL, Smith NT, Sanford TJ, Head N, Dec-Silver H. Physiology of alfentanil-induced rigidity. Anesthesiology 1986; 64: 440–6.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirota K, Hashimoto Y, Sato T, et al. I.v. lidocaine worsens histamine-induced bronchoconstriction in dogs. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 87–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yukioka H, Yoshimoto N, Nishimura K, Fujimori M. Intravenous lidocaine as a suppressant of coughing during tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1985; 64: 189–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yukioka H, Hayashi M, Terai T, Fujimori M. Intravenous lidocaine as a suppressant of coughing during tracheal intubation in elderly patients. Anesth Analg 1993; 77: 309–12.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pizov R, Brown RH, Weiss TS, et al. Wheezing during induction of general anesthesia in patients with and without asthma. A randomized, blinded trial. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 1111–6.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsou CH, Luk HN, Chiang SC, Hsin ST, Wang JH. Fentanyl-induced coughing and airway hyperrespon-siveness. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin 2002; 40: 165–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei -Zen Sun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, C.S., Sun, W.Z., Chan, W.H. et al. Intravenous lidocaine and ephedrine, but not propofol, suppress fentanyl-induced cough. Can J Anesth 51, 654–659 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03018421

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03018421

Keywords

  • Fentanyl
  • Lidocaine
  • Ephedrine
  • Intravenous Lidocaine
  • Peripheral Venous Line