Skip to main content
Log in

An experimental trial to establish risk communication as a tool to decrease the risk by exposure to multiple chemicals for the future generations

  • Original Article
  • Ethics and Social Issues
  • Published:
Reproductive Medicine and Biology

Abstract

Background

Recently, it has become clear that fetuses are exposed to multiple chemicals and environmental contaminants. However, it has been reported that allergies among young children have been increasing rapidly in the last few decades, and some congenital anomalies are also increasing. There is no evidence to connect these facts directly, however if adverse health effects are caused by environmental reasons, it could be prevented by early education or risk communication.

Methods

The authors gave lectures to students at a high school and universities, and carried out a questionnaire survey before and after the lectures to see the change of the students’ knowledge, attitude and behavior. The total number of high-school students and university students was 47 and 605, respectively.

Results

It became clear that all the levels of knowledge, attitude and behavior were elevated, and they were more elevated among high school students than university students. It was suggested that risk communication at a younger age is important to elevate people’s attention and motivate them, and eventually prevent their future health risk from environmental contaminants.

Conclusion

Risk communication at a young age would be more effective in increasing students’ knowledge, attitude and behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Todaka E, Mori C. Necessity to establish new risk assessment and risk communication for human fetal exposure to multiple endocrine disruptors in Japan.Congenit Anomal Kyoto 2002;42: 87–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mori C. Possible effect of endocrine disruptors on male reproductive function.Acta Anat Nippon 2001;76: 361–368.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mori C, Komiyama M, Adachi Tet al. Application of toxicogenomic analysis to risk assessment of delayed long-term effects of multiple chemicals, including endocrine disruptors in human fetuses.Environ Health Perspectives 2003;111: 803–809.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Center for Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction (CERHR). Available from: URL: http://cerhr.niehs.nih.gov/ aboutCERHR/index.html

  5. National Academy of Sciences.Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and. Children, Washington: D.D. National Academy Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wigle DT. Environmental threats to child health: overview. In:Child Health and the Environment. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003; 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Calabrese EJ.Age and Susceptibility to Toxic Substances. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jacobson JL, Jacobson SW. Intellectual impairment in children exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls in utero.N Eng J Med 1996;335: 783–789.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moore KL, Persaud TVN.The Developing Human, 6th edn. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Needleman HL. Lead levels and children’s phychologic performance (Letter).N Engl J Med 1979;301: 163.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Perera FP. Molecular epidemiology: insights into cancer susceptibility, risk assessment and prevention.J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88: 496–509.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Whyatt RM, Perera FP. Application of biologic markers to studies of envi ronmental risks in children and the developing fetus.Environ Health Perspectives 1995;103: 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization.Principles for Evaluating Health Risks from Chemicals during Infancy and Early Childhood: The Need for a Special Approach. Environmental Health Criteria 59. Geneva: WHO, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Needham LL, Sexton K. Assessing children’s exposure to hazardous environmental chemicals: an overview of selected research challenges and complexities.J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol 2000;10: 611–629.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Odajima H. Kikanshi zensoku.Jap J Pediat Med 2003;35: 589–595.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Urabe K. Atopic dermatitis no Ekigaku.Jap J Pediat Med 2003;35: 649–652.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The National Children’s Study Home Page. Available from: URL: http://nationalchildrensstudy.gov/

  18. The Ministry of Environment Government of Japan Home Page. Available from: URL: http://www.env.go.jp/chemi/ communication/index.html

  19. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin.N Engl J Med 2002;346: 393–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Writing Group of the PREMIER Collaborative Research Group. Effects of comprehensive lifestyle modification on blood pressure control: main results of the PREMIER clinical trial.JAMA 2003;289: 2083–2093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kawabata T, Cross D, Nishioka N, Shimai S. Relationship between self-esteem and smoking behavior among Japanese early adolescents: initial results from a three-year study.J School Health 1999;69: 280–284.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. LaSala KB, Todd SJT. Preventing youth use of tobacco products: the role of nursing.Pediatr Nursing 2000;26: 143–148.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Josendal O, Aaro LE, Bergh IH. Effects of a school-based smoking prevention program among subgroups of adolescents.Health Education Res Theory Practice 1998;13: 215–224.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chisato Mori.

About this article

Cite this article

Todaka, E., Sakurai, K. & Mori, C. An experimental trial to establish risk communication as a tool to decrease the risk by exposure to multiple chemicals for the future generations. Reprod Med Biol 4, 65–69 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03016139

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03016139

Key words

Navigation