Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Human breasts: Unsupported hypotheses reviewed

  • Published:
Human Evolution

Abstract

Unlike other apes, human females’ breasts develop before first pregnancy and are permanently enlarged. Evidence suggests breasts act as signals to males but the critical data required to confirm this are lacking. These facts have led to a number of hypotheses about the evolutionary and adaptive significance of the human breast which fall into two groups. Those that address the presence of breasts in humans are (a) that they act as releasers of male sexual behaviour, (b) that they enable females to hide their reproductive condition, and (c) that they allow infants to nurse from their mother’s hip. Those that address variability in breast size are (d) that large breasts indicate lactational potential, (e) ability of mothers to invest prenatally in offspring, (f) mother’s fecundity, and (g) her longevity. Each hypothesis is reviewed and evaluated using logical or empirical arguments. Possible ways in which the adaptive significance of human breasts can be determined in contemporary populations are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander R. D. &Noonan K. M., 1979.Concealment of ovulation, parental care, and human social evolution. In (N. A. Chagnon & W. Irons, Eds). Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective, pp. 436–453. North Scituate, Mass.; Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmann J., 1980.Baboon Mothers and Infants. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff Mulder M., 1987.Kipsigis bridewealth payments. In (L. L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder & P. W. Turke, Eds). Human Reproductive Behaviour: A Darwinian Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broude G. E. &Grene S. J., 1976.Crosscultural codes on twenty sexual attitudes and practices. Ethnology 15: 410–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campaigne B. N., Katch V. L., Freedson P. &Sady S., 1979.Measurement of breast volume in females: description of a reliable method. Annals of Human Biology 6: 363–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell B. G., 1974.Human Evolution, 2nd edition. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cant J. G. H., 1981.Hypothesis for the evolution of human breasts and buttocks. American Naturalist, 117: 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro T. M. & Borgerhoff Mulder M. (in press).The problem of adaptation in the study of human behaviour. Ethology and Sociobiology.

  • Clutton-Brock T. H., Albon S. D. &Guiness F. E., 1987.Reproductive success in male and female re deer. In (T. H. Clutton-Brock, Ed). Reproductive Success. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook M. &McHenry R., 1978.Sexual Attraction. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie A. T., 1984.Lactation. In (C. R. Austin & R. V. Short, Eds). Hormonal Control of Reproduction, 2nd edition pp. 195–231. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook J. H., 1972.Sexual selection, dimorphism and social organisation in the primates. In (B. Campbell, Ed.). Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971 pp. 231–281. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook J. H. &Gartlan J. S., 1966.Evolution of primate societies. Nature, 210: 1200–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies N. B., 1982.Behaviour and competition for scarce resources. In (Kings College Sociobiology Group, Ed.). Current Problems in Sociobiology, pp. 363–380. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devi M. R., Kumari J. R. &Srikumari C. R., 1985.Fertility and mortality differences in relation to maternal body size. Annals of Human Biology, 12: 479–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eibil-Eibesfeldt I., 1970.Ethology: the Biology of Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R. A., 1958.The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford C. S. &Breach F. A., 1952.Patterns of Sexual Behaviour. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch R. E., 1975.Demographic implications of the biological determinants of female fecundity. Social Biology, 22: 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch R. E., 1978a.Menarche and fatness: reexamination of the critical body composition hypothesis. Science, 200: 1509–1513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch R. E., 1978b.Population, food intake, and fertility. Science, 199: 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch R. E., 1983.Reply to Anderson. Current Anthropology, 24: 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch R. E. &McArthur J. W., 1974.Menstrual cycles: fatness as a determinant of minimum weight necessary for their maintenance or onset. Science, 185: 949–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup G. G. Jr., 1982.Permanent breast enlargement in human females: a sociobiological analysis. Journal of Human Evolution, 11: 597–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup G. G. Jr., 1986.Unique features of human sexuality in the context of evolution. In (D. Byrne & K. Kelley, Eds). Alternative Approaches to the Study of Sexual Behavior, pp. 13–42. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlabum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart C. B., 1964.A biological view of toplessness. New Scientist, 23: (407), 558–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould S. J. &Vrba E. S., 1982.Exaption — a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8: 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham C. A. &Mc. Grew W. C., 1980.Menstrual synchrony in female undergraduates living on a coeducational campus. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 5: 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunther M., 1955.Instinct and the nursing couple. Lancet 1955: 575–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton C. E. &Rankin J., 1975.Changes in volume of the breast during the menstrual cycle. British Journal of Surgery, 62: 660–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt A. H., Harvey P. H., Larson S. G. &Short R. V., 1981.Testis weight, body and breeding system in primates. Nature, 293: 55–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann P. E., Rattigan S., Prosser C. G., Saint L. &Arthur P. G., 1984.Human lactation: back to nature. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 51: 337–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde R. A., 1975.The concept of function. In (G. Baerends, C. Beer & A. Manning, Eds). Function and Evolution in Behaviour, pp. 3–15. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander X., 1985. Penthouse Magazine, 20: (3), 131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hytten F. E., 1954.Clinical and chemical studies in human lactation VI. The functional capacity of the breast. British Medical Journal, 1: 912–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hytten F. E. &Thomson A. M., 1965.Pregnancy, childbirth and lactation. In (O. G. Edholm & A. L. Bacharach, Eds). The Physiology of Human Survival, pp. 327–350. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano T., 1980.Social behavior of wild pigmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) of Wamba: a preliminary report. Journal of Human Evolution, 9: 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katch V. L., Campaigne B, Freedson P., Sady S., Katch F. I. &Behnke A. R., 1980.Contribution of breast volume and weight to body fat distribution in females. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 53: 93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleine C. L. &Staneski R. A., 1980.First impressions of female bust size. Journal of Social Psychology, 110: 123–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konner M. &Worthman C., 1980.Nursing frequency, gonadal function, and birth spacing among! Kung hunter-gatherers. Sicence, 207: 788–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuttner R. E., 1975.On infant convenience and female breast form.American Naturalist, 109: 596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb M. E., Pleck J. H., Charnov E. L. &Levine J. A. 1985.Paternal behavior in humans. American Zoologist, 25: 883–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Blanc S. A. &Barnes E., 1974.On the adaptive significance of the human breast. American Naturalist, 108: 577–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman T. G., 1981.Skinfolds and body density and their relation to fatness: a review. Human Biology, 53: 181–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoi C. O., 1981.The origin of man. Science, 211: 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malina R. M., 1983.Menarche in atheletes: a synthesis and hypothesis. Annals of Human Biology, 10: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall W. A., 1970.Sex differences at puberty. Journal of Biosocial Science suppl., 2: 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason W. A., 1965.The social development of monkeys and apes. In (I. DeVore, Ed). Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes. pp. 514–543. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters W. H. &Johnson V. E., 1966.Human Sexual Response. Londo: J. & E. Churchill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J., 1977.Parental investment: a prospective analysis. Animal Behaviour, 25: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan E. 1972.The Descent of Woman, New York: Stein & Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris D. 1967.The Naked Ape. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn C. A., 1986.Birds that ‘cry wolf’. Nature, 319: 143–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassar A. M. &Smith R. E., 1975.Menstrual variations in thermal properties of the human breast. Journal of Applied Physiology, 39: 806–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peaker M., Vernon R. G. &Knight C. H., 1984.Physiological Strategies in Lactation. Zoological Society of London. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pond C. M., 1984.Physiological and ecological importance of energy storage in the evolution of lactation: evidence for a common pattern of anatomical organisation of adipose tissue in mammals. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 51: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice A. M., Paul A. A., Prentice A., Black A. E., Cole T. J. &Withehead R. G., 1986.Crosscultural differences in lactational performance. In (M. Hamosh & A. S. Goldman, Eds) Human Lactation — Maternal and Environmental factors. pp. 13–44. New York: Plenum Pubbl. Corp. October 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • «S. J. L.», 1986.Guardian Newspaper, January 15th, p. 22.

  • Salazar H. &Tobon H., 1974.Morphological changes in the mammary gland during development, pregnancy, and lactation. In (J. B. Josimovich, M. Reynolds & E. Cobo, Eds). Lactogenic Hormones, Fetal Nutrition and Lactation p. 221. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davard R., Bouchard C., LeBlanc C. &Tremblay A., 1983.Familial resemblance in fatness indicators. Annals of Human Biology, 10: 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schell L. M. &Hodges D. C., 1985.Variation in size at birth and cigarette smoking during pregnancy. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 68: 549–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt G. &Sigusch V., 1970.Sex differences in responses to psychosexual stimulation by films and slides. Journal of Sex Research, 6: 268–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schort R. V., 1976.The evolution of human reproduction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B., 195: 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short R. V., 1979.Sexual selection and its component parts, somatic and genital selection, as illustrated by man and the great apes. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 9: 131–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short R. V. &Drife J. O., 1977.The aetiology of mammary cancer in man and animals. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 41: 211–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson M. J. A., 1978.Tactile experience and sexual behaviour: aspects of development with special reference to primates. In (J. B. Hutchison, Ed). Biological Determinants of Sexual Behaviour. pp. 785–807. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R. L., 1984.Human sperm competition. In (R. L. Smith, Ed). Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems. pp. 601–659. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons D., 1979.The Evolution of Human Sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen N.On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 20: 410–463.

  • Trivers R. L., 1972.Parental investment and sexual selection. In (B. Campbell, Ed). Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971. pp. 136–179. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers R., 1985.Social Evolution. Menlo Park, California: Benjamin/Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trussel J., 1978.Menarche and fatness: reexamination of the critical body composition hypothesis. Science, 200: 1506–1509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turke P. W., 1984.Effects of ovulatory concealment and synchrony on protohominid mating systems and parental roles. Ethology and Sociobiology, 5: 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss E., 1975.The Female Breast. New York: Bantam books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickler W., 1972.The Sexual Code. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins J. S., Wiggins N. &Conger J. C., 1968.Correlates of heterosexual somatic preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10: 82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams G. C., 1966.Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witten D. M., 1971.The Breast: An Atlas of Tumor Radiology. Yearbook Medical Publishers Inc.

  • Wood J. W., Lai D., Johnson P. L., Campbell K. L. &Maslar I. A., 1985.Lactation and birth spacing in hihgland New Guinea. Journal of Biosocial Sciences suppl., 9: 159–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sub-Department of Animal Behaviour, University of Cambridge Madingley, CB3 8AA, Cambridge, UK

    T. M. Caro

Authors
  1. T. M. Caro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caro, T.M. Human breasts: Unsupported hypotheses reviewed. Hum. Evol. 2, 271–282 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03016112

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03016112

Key words

Search

Navigation