Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cholangiopancréatographie par résonance magnétique

  • Published:
Acta Endoscopica

Résumé

La cholangiopancréatographie par résonance magnétique (CPRM) est le résultat du développement des techniques rapides d'imagerie en résonance magnétique et ouvre de nouvelles possibilités dans l'évaluation des maladies bilio-pancréatiques.

Cette technique non invasive de visualisation directe des voies biliaires ne nécessite pas d'injection d'agent de contraste ou d'autre intervention au niveau biliaire pour obtenir des images en CPMR d'un niveau optimal.

Les séquences de CPRM requièrent des images rapides et la disponibilité de techniques complémentaires (réduction des artefacts, suppression des graisses, et parfois, l'acquisition d'une tri-dimension).

Summary

MR Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the result of the development of the MR fast images techniques that allowed a new possibility in the evaluation of bilio-pancreatic diseases.

This non-invasive technique for direct visualization of the biliary ducts does not require contrast medium injection or any further biliary intervention in order to obtain optimal MRCP sequences.

MRCP sequence requires fast imaging and the availability of other complimentary techniques (artifacts reduction, fat-supperession and, in some cases, three-dimensional acquisition).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Références

  1. WALLNEY B.K., SSCHUMACHER K.A., WEIDENMAIER W., FRIEDRICH J.M.et al. — Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR Cholangiography with a T2-weighted Contrast-enhanced fast sequence.Radiology, 1991,181, 805–808.

    Google Scholar 

  2. MORIMOTO K., SHIMOI M., SHIRAKAWA T.et al. — Biliary obstruction: evaluation with three-dimensional MR cholangiography.Radiology, 1992,183, 578–580.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. TAKEHARA Y., ICHIJO K., TOOYAMA N.et al. — Breath-hold — MR Cholangiopancreatography with a long-echo-train fast spin-echo sequence and a surface coil in chronic pancreatitis.Radiology, 1994,192, 73–78.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. GUIBAUD L., BRET P.M., REINHOLD C., ATRI M., BARKUN A.N.G. — Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: value of MR cholangiopgraphy.A.J.R., 1994,163, 847–850.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. SHIONO T., IWASAKI N. — MR Cholangiography with fast imaging scheme.In: Society of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Abstract Book: p. 1454. Presented at SMR Annual Meeting, Aug. 19–25, 1995. Nice, France.

  6. LAUBENBERGER J., BUCHERT M., SCHNEIDER B., BLUM U., HENNIG J., LANGER M. — Breath-hold projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP): a new method for examination of the bile and pancreatic ducts.Magn. Res. Med., 1995,33, 18–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. SANANES J.C., BONNET M., LECESNE R.et al. — Magnetic Resonance cholangiography using HASTE sequence. Optimization and clinical evaluation in extrahepatic cholostasis.In: Society of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Abstract Book: p. 1453. Presented at SMR Annual Meeting, Aug. 19–25, 1995. Nice, France.

  8. MYAZAKI T., YAMASHITA Y., TSUCHIGAME T.et al._ — MR Cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (Half-Fourier Acquisition Single-Shot Turbo Spin-Echo) Sequences.A.J.R., 1996,166, 1297–1303.

    Google Scholar 

  9. MEAKEM T.J., HOLLAND G.A., McDERMOTT V.G.et al. — Fast spin echo multicoil Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography: initial experience.In: Society of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Abstract Book: p. 47. Pesented at SMR Annual Meeting Aug. 14–20, 1993. New York USA.

  10. OUTWATER E.K. — MR Cholangiography with a fast spinech sequence.J.M.R.I., 1993,3 (P), 131.

    Google Scholar 

  11. MACAULAY S.E., SCHULTE S.J., SEKIJIMA J.H.et al. — Evaluation of a non-breath-hold MR cholangiography technique.Radiology, 1995,196, 227–232.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. REINHOLD C., GUIBAUD L., GENIN G., BRET P.M. — MR Cholangiopancreatography: comparison between two-dimensional fast spin-echo and three-dimensional gradientecho pulse sequences.J.M.R.I., 1995,4, 379–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. BARISH M.A., YUCEL E.K., SOTO J.A., CHUTTANI R., FERRUCCI J.T. — MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique.A.J.R., 1995,165, 295–300.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. LAGHI A., DI GIROLAMO M., CATALANO C., BROGLIA L., ALBERTINI PETRONI G., MESSINA A., SCIPIONI A., PAVONE P. — MR Cholangiography: a new non invasive technique to visualize the biliary and pancreatic ducts. Atti del Biliary Club “La patologia della via biliare principale”, Rome, December 2–3, 1994, p. 107 (abstract).

  15. PAVONE P., LAGHI A., CATALANO C.et al. — MR Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP): technique optimization and preliminary results.European Radiology, 1996,6, 147–152.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. ANDERSON C.M., SALONER D., TSURUDA J.S.et al. — Artifacts in maximum-intensity-projection display of MR angiograms.A.J.R., 1990,154, 623–629.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. CLINE H.E., DUMOULIN C.L., LORENSEN W.E.et al. — Volume rendering and connectivity algorithms for MR angiography.Magn. Reson. Med., 1991,18, 384–494.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. TAOUREL P., BRET P.M., REINHOLD C., BARKUN A.N., ATRI M. — Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: diagnosis with MR Cholangiopancreatography.Radiology, 1996,199, 521–527.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. PAVONE P., LAGHI A., CATALANO C.et al. — Caroli's disease: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).Abdominal Imaging, 1996,21, 117–119.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. ISHIZAKI Y., WAKAYAMA T., OKADA Y., KOBAYASHI T. — Magnetic resonance cholangiography for evaluation of obstructive jaundice.Am. J. Gastroenterol., 1993,88, 2072–2077.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. HALL-CRAGGS M.A., ALLEN C.M., OWENS C.M.et al. — MR Cholangiography: clinical evaluation in 40 cases.Radiology, 1993,189, 423–427.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. BARON, R.L., SHUMAN W.P., LEE S.P.et al. — MR appearance of gallstonesin vitro at 1.5 T: correlation with chemical composition.A.J.R., 1989,153, 497–502.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. GUIBAUD, L., RRET P. M., REINHOLD C.et al. — Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR Cholangiography.Radiology, 1995,197, 109–115.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. CHAN Y., CHAN A.C.W., LAM W.W.M.et al. — Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR Cholangiography and Endoscopic retrogrrade Cholangiography.Radiology, 1996,200, 85–89.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. REGAN F., FRADIN J., KHAZAN R.et al. — Choledocholithiasis: evaluation with MR Cholangiography.A.J.R., 1996,167, 1441–1445.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. LAGHI A., PAVONE P., CATALANO C.et al. — Choledocholithiasis: diagnositc accuracy of MR Cholangiography.Radiology, 1995,197 (P), 312.

    Google Scholar 

  27. LILLEMOE K.D., PITT H.A., CMERON J.L. — Current management of benign bile duct strictures.Adv. Surg., 1992,25, 119–173.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. CRIST D.W., GADACZ R.R. — Complications of laparoscopic surgery.Surg. Clin. North. Am., 1993,73, 265–289.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. SERANZA V. — Papillary stenosis: fact or fiction?Ital. J. Surg. Sci., 1988,18, 401–406.

    Google Scholar 

  30. PAPP J., TULASSAY Z., BIELAWSKI J.et al. — Diagnostic value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in bilio-digestive anastomoses.Acta Hepatogastroenterol., 1977,24, 41–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. PAVONE P., LAGHI A., CATALANO C.et al. — MR — Cholangiography in the evaluation of patients with biliary-enteric anastomoses.A.J.R., 1997,169, 807–811.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. NGHIEM H.V., FREENY P.C. — Radiologic staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Radiol. Clin. North. Am., 1994,32, 71–78.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. SOTO J.A., BARISH M.A., YUCEL E.K.et al. — Pancreatic duct: MR Cholangiography with a three-dimensional fast spin echo technique.Radiology, 1995,196, 459–464.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. BRET P.M., REINHOLD C., TAOUREL P.et al. — Pancreas divisum: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography.Radiology 1996,199, 99–103.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. MATOS C., MENTENS T., DEVIERE J.et al. — Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation.Radiology. 1997,203, 435–441.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Rome “La Sapienza», Rome, (Italie)

    A. Laghi & V. Panebianco

  2. Dept of radiology, University of Parma, Via Gramsci, 14, 43100, Parma, (Italie)

    P. Pavone (Prof.), G. Luccichenti, F. Cademartiri & E. Spaggiari

Authors
  1. P. Pavone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Laghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Luccichenti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. V. Panebianco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. Cademartiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. E. Spaggiari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Pavone, P., Laghi, A., Luccichenti, G. et al. Cholangiopancréatographie par résonance magnétique. Acta Endosc 30, 453–463 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03015796

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03015796

Mots-clés

Key-words

Search

Navigation