Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

IRM dans l'évaluation de la cirrhose hépatique

Magnetic resonance in the evaluation of hepatic cirrhosis

  • Published:
Acta Endoscopica

Résumé

La cirrhose hépatique est une maladie chronique et progressive caractérisée par de la fibrose et sur le plan anatomique par la présence de nodules anormaux. Il en résulte un dysfonctionnement cellulaire, l'apparition d'une nécrose suivie de régénération. Le diagnostic définitif est habituellement posé par biopsie, mais les méthodes d'imagerie peuvent être utilisées comme techniques non invasives. Dans cet article, nous revoyons la contribution de l'IRM au diagnostic et au traitement de la cirrhose hépatique. Nous décrivons d'un point de vue spécifique les altérations morphologiques (hépatosplénomégalie, hypertension portale, ascite, adénopathie lymphatique, fibrose hépatique confluante), les modifications de l'intensité du signal (l'homogénéité de la texture hépatique, septa fibreux) et les différents types de rehaussement après administration de contraste (chélateurs de gadolinium, MnDPDP, particules d'oxyde de fer) qui permettent le diagnostic et les degrés successifs de la cirrhose. Enfin, nous discutons brièvement les étapes de la carcinogenèse conduisant au développement du carcinome hépatocellulaire.

Abstract

Liver cirrhosis is a chronic and progressive process characterized by fibrosis and anatomically abnormal nodules. Cirrhosis results in liver cell dysfunction, necrosis and regeneration. Although the definitive diagnosis is usually made by biopsy, diagnostic imaging can serve as a noninvasive diagnostic modality. In this review, the value of MR in the diagnosis and management of liver cirrhosis will be evaluated. Specifically, t morphologic changes (gross liver appearance, portal hypertension, splenomegaly, ascites, hilar lymphadenopathy, confluent hepatic fibrosis), signal intensity changes (inhomogeneous hepatic texture, fibrous septa) and contrast enhancement patterns (intravascular and interstitial gadolinium chelates, MnDPDP, iron oxide particles) that allow a diagnosis and grading of cirrhosis will be described. Also, the steps in carcinogenesis leading to the development of hepatocellular carcinomas will be briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. ITO K., MITCHELL D.G., GABATA T.. — Enlargement of hilar periportal space: a sign of early cirrhosis at MR imaging.J.M.R.I., 2000,11, 136–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. JOHNSON C.D., EHMAN R.L., RAKELA J., ILSTRUP D.M. — MR angiography in portal hypertension: detection of varices and imaging techniques.J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 1991,15, 578–584.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. ITO K., MITCHELL D.G., HANN H.W., KIM Y., FUJITA T., OKAZAKI H., HONJO K., MATSUNAGA N. — Viral-induced cirrhosis: grading of severity using MR imaging,AJR, 1999,173, 591–596.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. ITO K., MITCHELL D.G., HANN H.W., OOTWATER H.W., KIM Y., FUJITA T., OKAZAKI H., HONJO K., MATSUNAGA N.._ — Progressive viral-induced cirrhosis: serial MR imaging findings and clinical correlation.Radiology, 1998,207, 729–735.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. CASSANI F., ZOLI M., BAFFONI L., CORDIANI M.R., BRUNORI A., BIANCHI F.B., FISI E.. — Prevalence and significance of abdominal lymphadenopathy in patients with chronic liver discasc: an ultrasound study.J. Clin. Gastroenterol., 1990,12, 42–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. LYTTKENS K., PRYTZ H., FORSBERG L., HAGERSTRAND I. — Hepatic lymph nodes as follow-up factor in primary biliary cirrhosis: an ultrasound study,Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 1995,30, 1036–1040.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. MURAKAMI T., KIM T., NAKAMURA H.. — Hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatoma,J.M.R.I., 1998,8, 346–358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. MARTÍ-BONMATÍ L., TALENS A., DEL OLMO J. et al. — MR imaging in chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis with histologic correlation.Radiology, 1993,188, 37–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. ITO K., MITCHELL D.G., GABATA T., HANN H.W., KIM P.N., FUJITA T., AWAYA H., HONJO K., MATSUNAGA N. — Hepatocellular carcinoma: association with increased iron deposition in the cirrhotic liver at MR imaging.Radiology, 1999,212, 235–240.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. MARTÍ-BONMATÍ L., MASIÁ L., CASILLAS C.et al. — Differentiation of healthy from cirrhotic livers: evaluation of parametric images after constrast administration in MR imaging.Investigative Radiology, 1996,31, 768–773.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. MITCHELL D.G.. — Focal manifestations of diffuse liver disease at MR imaging.Radiology, 1992,185, 1–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. MILES K.A., HAYBALL M.P., DIXON A.K.. — Functional images of hepatic perfusion obtained with dynamic CT.Radiology, 1993,188, 405–411.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. MARTÍ-BONMATÍ L., LONJEDO E., POYATOS C., CASILLAS C.. — MnDPDP enhancement characteristics and differentiation between cirrhotic and noncirrhotic livers. InvestigativeRadiology, 1998,33, 717–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. MURAKAMI T., BARON R.L., FEDERLE M.P.et al. — Cirrhosis of the liver: MR imaging with Manafodipir trisodium (Mn-DPDP)Radiology, 1996,198, 567–572.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. MARCHAL G.M., NI Y., YU J., LODEMANN K.P., BAERT A.L.. — Mn-DPDP enhanced MRI in experimental bile duct obstruction.J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 1993,17, 290–296.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. LIOU J., LEE J.K., BORRELLO J.A., BROWN J.J.. — Differentiation of hepatomas from nonhepatomatous masses: use of MnDPDP-enhanced MR images.Magn. Reson. Imaging, 1994,12, 71–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. YAMASHITA Y., YAMAMOTO H., HIRAI A.et al. — MR imaging enhancement with superparamagnetic iron oxide in chronic liver disease: influence of liver dysfunction and parenchymal pathology.Abdom Imaging, 1996,21, 318–323.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. TANG Y., YAMASHITA Y., ARAKAWA A., NAMIMOTO T., MITSUZAKI K., ABE Y., KATAHIRA K., TAKAHASHI M.. — Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma arising in cirrhotic livers: comparison of gadolinium-and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging.A.J.R., 1999,172, 1547–1554.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. EARLS J.P., THEISE N.D., WEINREB J.C., DECORATO D.R., KRINSKY G.A., ROFSKY N.M., MIZRACHI H., TEPERMAN L.W.. — Dysplastic nodules and hepatocellular carcinoma: thin-section MR imaging of explanted cirrhotic livers with pathologic correlation.Radiology, 1996,201, 207–214.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. HARATAKE J., SCHEUER P.J.. — An immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study of the sinusoids of hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer, 1990,65, 1985–1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

De Martí-Bonmatí, L. IRM dans l'évaluation de la cirrhose hépatique. Acta Endosc 30, 429–438 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03015794

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03015794

Mots-clés

Key-words

Navigation