Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pathologies hémorroïdaires

Hemorrhoids

  • Périnéologie
  • Published:
Acta Endoscopica

Résumé

Les hémorroïdes consistent en un tissu hautement vascularisé mais ne sont pas simplement des varices du plexus hémorroïdaire. Elles deviennent symptomatiques quand elles saignent, se prolabent ou se compliquent et deviennent douloureuses. Du point de vue clinique, il est classique de les distinguer selon 4 degrés soit internes, soit externes, les premières se formant au niveau du canal anal proximal, les secondes dans sa partie distale, sous la ligne pectinée ou sur la marge anale où elles sont recouvertes d'un tissue cutané. Leur étiologie et leur pathogenèse sont inconnues. Le diagnostic d'hémorroïdes internes repose sur la proctoscopie. La proctosigmoïdoscopie et la coloscopie sont nécessaires chez toute personne âgée de plus de 40 ans se plaignant de saignement rectal. Le traitement des hémorroïdes volumineuses mais asymptomqtiques n'est pas nécessaire et peut même s'avérer agressif. Le traitement des hémorroïdes peut être médical, instrumental en ambulatoire, et chirurgical. Il inclut la sclérothérapie, la ligature élastique, la cryothérapie, la coagulation par infrarouge, l'électrocoagulation, la dilatation anale et la sphinctérotomie interne. L'excision chirurgicale est considérée comme indispensable pour un traitement radical et définitif des hémorroïdes. La muqueuse doit être conservée et en particulier la zone adhérant au sphincter interne à hauteur de la ligne pectinée de façon à assurer le maintien des mécanismes physiologiques de continence et de défécation. Aucune technique ne peut être considérée comme optimale et exclusive. Chacune doit adopter une attitude éclectique en fonction des patients et des nombreuses manifestations hémorroïdaires.

Summary

Hemorrhoids consist of a highly vascularized tissue, but they are not simply varices of the hemorrhoidal plexus. They become symptomatic when they bleed, or prolapse, or become complicated and cause pain. From the clinical point of view, hemorrhoids are classically distinguished in four degrees as being internal or external, the former arising in the proximal anal canal, the latter in the distal anal canal, below the dentate line, or in anal verge, with a cutaneous lining. Their etiology and pathogenesis is unnknown. The diagnosis of internal hemorrhoids is based on proctoscopy. The proctosigmoidoscopy and the colonoscopy are mandatory in all patients over 40 years old who complain rectal bleeding. Treatment of bulky but asymptomatic hemorrhoids is unnecessary and possibly harmful. Hemorrhoids treatment may be medical, instrumental on an outpatient basis, and surgical. It includes sclerotherapy, rubber-band ligation, cryotherapy, infrared coagulation, electrocoagulation, forcible anal dilation, internal sphincterotomy. Surgical excision is considered indispensable for a radical and definitive treatment of hemorrhoids. The mucosa has to be conserved especially in the zone adhering to the internal sphincter, in the dentate line area to insure the maintenance of the physiological mechanisms of continence and of defecation. There is no one technique which can be considered optimal and exclusive. One must adapt an eclectic attitude regarding the different patients and the various hemorrhoidal manifestations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. DENNISON A.R., WHERRY D.C., MORRIS D.L. — Hemorrhoids: Non operative management.Surg. Clin. North. Am., 1988,68, 1401–1409.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. HAAS P.A., HAAS G.P., SCHMALTZ S.et al. — The prevalence of haemorrhoids.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1983,26, 435–439.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. JOHANSON J.F., SONNENBERG A. — The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation: An epidemiologic study.Gastroenterology, 1990,98, 380–386.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. GAZET J.C., REDDING W., RICKETT J.W.S. — The prevalence of haemorrhoids.Proc. R. Soc. Med., 1970,63, 78–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. JOHANSON J.F., SONNENBERG A. — Temporal changes in the occurrence of haemorrhoids in the United States and England.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1991,34, 585–591.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. LODER P.B., KAMM M.A., NICHOLLS R.J.et al. — Haemorrhoids: Pathology, pathophysiology and aetiology.Br. J. Surg., 1994,81, 946–954.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. HULME-MOIR M., BARTOLO D.C. — Haemorrhoids. Gastroenterol.Clin. North Am., 2001,30, (1) 183–197.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. THOMSON W.H.S. — The nature of haemorrhoids.Br. J. Surg., 1975,62, 542–545.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. DODI G., SPENCER R.J. — Outpatient Coloproctology, Textbook And Color Atlas, pp. 1–841, Piccin Ed. Padova, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. BURKITT D.P. — Hemorrhoids, varicose veins and deep vein thrombosis: epidemiologic features and suggested causative factors.Can. J. Surg., 1975,18, 483.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. DEUTSCH A.A., MOSHKOVITZ M., NUDELMAN I.et al. — Anal pressure measurements in the study of hemorrhoid etiology and their relation to treatment.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1987,30, 855–857.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. EL-GENDI M.A., ABDEL-BAKEY N. — Anorectal pressure in patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1986,29, 388–391.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. GIBBONS C.F., BANNISTER J.J., READ N.W. — Role of constipation and anal hypertonia in the pathogenesis of haemorrhoids.Br. J. Surg., 1988,75, 656–660.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. HO Y.H., SEOW-CHOEN F., GOH H.S. — Haemorrhoidectomy and disordered rectal and anal physiology in patients with prolapsed haemorrhoids.Br. J. Surg., 1995,82, 596–598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. LIN J.K. — Anal manometric studies in hemorrhoids and anal fissures.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1989,32, 839–842.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. SUN W.M., PECK R.J., SHORTHOUSE A.J.et al. — Haemorrhoids are associated not with hypertrophy of the internal anal sphincter, but with hypertension of the anal cushions.Br. J. Surg., 1992,79, 592–594.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. SUN W.M., READ N.W., SHORTHOUSE A.J. — Hypertensive anal cushions as a cause of the high anal pressures in patients with haemorrhoids.Br. J. Surg., 1990,77, 458–462.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. WALDRON D.J., KUMAR D., HALLAN R.I.et al. — Prolonged ambulant assessment of anorectal function in patients with prolapsing hemorrhoids.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1989,32, 968–974.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. ROSWELL M., BELLO M., HERNINGWAY D.M. — Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidecomy: randomised controlled trial.Lancet, 2000,355, 779–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. DODI G., BOGONI F., INFANTINO A.et al. — Hot or cold in anal pain? A study of the changes in internal anal sphincter pressure profiles.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1986,29, 248–251.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. HO Y.H., FOO C.I., SEOW-CHOEN F., GOH H.S. — Prospective randomized controlled trial of a micronized flavonoid fraction to reduce bleeding after haemorrhoidectomy.Br. J. Surg., 1995,82, 1034–1035.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. The Standards Task Force, American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons: Practice parameters for the treatment of hemorrhoids.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1993,36, 1118–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. SANTOS G., NOVELL J.R., KHOURY G.et al. — Long-term results of large dose, single session phenol injection sclerotherapy for hemorrhoids.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1993,36, 958–961.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. BARWELL J., WATKINS R.M., LLOYD-DAVIES E.et al. — Life-threatening retroperitoneal sepsis after hemorrhoid injection sclerotherapy.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1999,42, 421–423.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. KAMAN L., AGGARWAL S., KUMAR R.et al. — Necrotising fascitis after injection sclerotherapy for hemorrhoids.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1999,42, 419–420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. MacRAE H.M., McLEOD R.S. — Comparison of hemorrhoid treatment modalities: A metanalysis.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1995,38, 687–694.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. DODI G. — Multiple rubber band ligation after one loading of instrument.Int. J. Colorectal. Dis., 1992,7, 112.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. RUSSELL T.R., DONOHUE J.H. — Hemorrhoidal banding, a warning.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1985,28, 291–293.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. WROBLESKI D.E., CORMAN M.L., VEIDENHEIMER M.C., COLLER J.A. — Long term evaluation of rubber band ligation in hemorrhoidal disease.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1980,23, 278–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. DENNISON A.R., WHISTON R.J., ROONEY S.et al. — Trends in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease.Am. J. Gastroenterol., 1989,84, 475–481.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. LORD P.H. — A new regime for the treatment of haemorhoids.Proc. R. Soc. Med., 1968,61, 935–936.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. HARDY K.J., WHEATLEY I.C., HEFFERMAN E.B. — Anal dilatation and haemorrhoidectomy: A prospective study.Med. J. Aust., 1975,2, 88–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. SCHOUTEN W.R., VAN VROONHOVEN T.J. — Lateral sphincterotomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: A clinical and manometric study.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1986,29, 869–872.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. DENNISON A.R., WHERRY D.C., MORRIS D.L. — Hemorrhoids: Non operative management.Surg. Clin. North. Am., 1988,68, 1401–1409.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. NIVATVONGS S. — Hemorrhoids. In Gordon PH, Nivatvongs S (eds): Principles and Practice of Surgery for the Colon, Rectum and Anus. St Louis, MO, Quality Medical Publishing, 1992, pp. 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  36. DODI G. — An improved technique of local anal anesthesia.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1986,29, 71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. CARAPETI E.A., KAMM M.A., McDONALD P.J.et al. — Randomized trial of open versus closed day-case haemorrhoidectomy.Br. J. Surg., 1999,86, 612–613.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. HO Y.H., SEOW-CHOEN F. TAN M.et al. — Randomized controlled trial of open and closed haemorrhoidectomy.Br. J. Surg., 1997,84, 1729–1730.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. ROE A.M., BARTOLO D.C., VELLACOTT K.D.et al. — Submucosal versus ligation excision haemorrhoidectomy: A comparison of anal sensation anal sphincter manometry and postoperative pain and function.Br. J. Surg., 1987,74, 948–951.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. EU K.W., SEOW-CHOEN F., GOB H.S. — Comparison of emergency and elective haemorrhoidectomy.Br. J. Surg., 1994,81, 308–310.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. HAYSSEN T.K., LUCTEFELD M.A., SENAGORE A.J. — Limited hemorrhoidectomy: Results and long term follow-up.Dis. Colon Rectum 1999,42, 909–914.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. SALEEBY R.G. Jr, ROSEN L., STASIK J.J.et al. — Hemorrhoidectomy during pregnancy: Risk or relief?Dis. Colon Rectum, 1991,34, 260–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. MEFFIGAN B.J., MONSON J.R.T., HARTLEY J.H. — Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.Lancet, 355, 782–785.

  44. ARMSTRONG D.N., AMBROZE W.L., SCHERTZER M.E., ORANGIO G.R. — Harmonic Scalpel® vs. electrocautery hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective evaluation.Dis. Colon Rectum, 2001,44, 558–564.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. KHAN S., PAWLAK S.E., EGGENBERGER J.C.et al. — Surgical Treatment of Hemorrhoids. Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Closed Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy and the Harmonic Scalpel® Technique of Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy.Dis. Colon Rectum, 2001,44, 845–849.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. TAN J.J.Y., SEOW-CHOEN F. — Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Diathermy and Harmonic Scalpel® Hemorrhoidectomy.Dis. Colon Rectum, 2001,44, 677–679.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. MORINAGA K., HASUDA K., IKEDA T. — A novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with a newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter.Am. J. Gastroenterol., 1995,90, 610–613.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. SAILER M., BUSSEN D., DEBUS E.S.et al. — Quality of life in patients with benign anorectal disorders.Br. J. Surg., 1998,85, 1716–1719.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. JEFFERY P.J., RITCHIE J.K., PARKS A.G. — Treatment of haemorrhoids in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Lancet, 1997,1, 1084–1085.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Van KRUININGEN H.J. — On the use of antibiotics in Crohn's disease.J. Clin. Gastroenterol., 1995,20, 310–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. WOLKOMIR A.F., LUCHTEFELD M.A. — Surgery for symptomatic hemorrhoids and anal fissures in Crohn's disease.Dis. Colon Rectum, 1993,36, 545–547.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. LODER P.B., KAMM M.A., NICHOLLS R.J.et al. — Haemorrhoids: Pathology, pathophysiology and aetiology.Br. J. Surg., 1994,81, 946–954.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. MEDICH D.S., FAZIO V.W. — Hemorrhoids, anal fissure and carcinoma of the colon, rectum, and anus during pregnancy.Surg. Clin. North. Am., 1995,75, 77–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Dodi, G. Pathologies hémorroïdaires. Acta Endosc 33, 389–405 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03015754

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03015754

Mots-clés

Key-words

Navigation