Skip to main content
Log in

Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation for refractory posterior epistaxis

  • Main Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intractable posterior epistaxis remains a challenging problem for our specialty Conventional management options in the form of anterior and posterior packing, arterial ligation of the internal maxillary or the external carotid artery and embolization, are not entively satisfactory because of morbidity, high failure rates, and occasional significant complication. Our experience with endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation for four patients with posterior existaxis is described. All patients had epistaxis refractory to anterior and posterior nasal packing, which was rapidly controlled following the procedure. The technique of spheno-palatine artery ligation is described. The technique is simple and effective and prevents the morbidity and complications of nasal packing. It is especially useful in systemically compromised individuals who otherwise tolerate nasal packing poorly. and should be one of the treatment options to be considered relatively early in the management of epistaxis refractory to anterior & posterior nasal packing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elwany S. Kamel T. Mekhamer A. Pneumatic nasal catheters: advantages and drawbacks J Laryngol Otol 1986; 100: 641–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McDonald T. Pearson BW. Follow up on maxillary artery ligation for epistaxis Arch Otolaryngol 1980; 106: 635–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schaitkin B. Strauss M., Houck JR. Epistaxis: medical versus surgical therapy, a comparison of efficacy complications and economic considerations Laryngoscope 1987; 97: 1392–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shaw CB Wax MK Wetmore SJ. Epistaxis a comparison of treatment Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 109: 60–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Spafford P., Durham JS. Epistaxis: efficacy of arterial ligation and long term outcome J Otolaryngol 1992; 21: 252–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Siniluoto TM Leinonen AS Kartunnen AK. Embolisation for management of posterior epistaxis Arch Otolaryngol 1993; 119: 837–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Metson R. Hanson DG. Bilateral facial nerve paralysis following arterial embolisation for epistaxis Otolaryngol Head and Neck Surg 1983; 91: 299–302.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Prades J. Microciugia endonasal de la Fossa Pterygomacilary del Meato Medio Barcelona Spain Salvet Editores 1980

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sharp HR. Rowe-Jones JM. Biring GS. Mackay IS. Endoscopic ligation or diathermy of the sphenopalatine artery in persistant epistaxis J Laryngol Otol 1997; 111: 1047–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pritkin JB. Calearelli DD. Panje WR. Endoscopic ligation of the internal maxillary artery for treatment of intractable posterior epistaxis Annal Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998; 107: 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Srinivasan V. Sheraman IW. Sullivan G., Surgical Management of intractable epistaxis audit of results J Laryngol Otol 2000; 114: 697.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alok Thakar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thakar, A., Sharan, C. Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation for refractory posterior epistaxis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 57, 215–218 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03008017

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03008017

Keywords

Navigation