Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and factors associated with poor analgesia during epidural block for labour pain. Emphasis was placed on determining the incidence, magnitude and factors associated with epidural catheter migration as well as any relationship between catheter migration and the quality of analgesia. Catheter movement was assessed, prospectively, in 211 consecutive parturients who had an epidural catheter placed for labour analgesia. The magnitude and direction of catheter movement was assessed by measurement of the length of the catheter at the skin at the time of epidural placement, and immediately before removal of the catheter, after delivery. Fifty-four per cent of the catheters migrated during labour and 70 per cent of these migrated out of the epidural space. The quality of analgesia provided by the epidural block was assessed by the caseroom nurse caring for the patient. Seventeen per cent of the patients had unsatisfactory analgesia. There was an increase in poor analgesia in those patients whose catheters migrated compared with those in whom the catheters were stable (P < 0.05). We conclude that catheter migration during labour results in a greater incidence of inadequate block and unsatisfactory analgesia.
Résumé
Dans cette étude, nous avons analysé prospectivement l’efficacité analgésique de 211 blocs périduraux successifs chez des parturientes et l’avons mis en relation avec le déplacement éventuel du cathéter péridural mesuré en comparant sa position lors de l’insertion à celle précédent son retrait, après l’accouchement. Près de 54 pour cent des cathéters se sont déplacés durant le travail et sept fois sur dix, en sortant de l’espace péridural. D’après leur infirmière, 17 pour cent des patientes avaient une analgésie inadéquate et nous avons identifié la migration du cathéter comme facteur de risque significatif (P < 0,05) dans la genèse de ce problème.
Article PDF
References
Bromage PR. Epidural Analgesia. 2nd ed. London: Saunder 1978.
Doughty A. A precise method of cannulating the lumbar epidural space. Anaesthesia 1974; 29: 63–5.
Hood DD. Obstetric anesthesia: complication and problems.In: Problems in Anesthesia, Kirby RR, Brown DL (Eds.). Obstetric Anesthesia, Hood DD (Guest Ed.) 1989; 3: 1–18.
Narang VPS, Linter SPK. Failure of extradural blockade in obstetrics: a new hypothesis. Br J Anaesth 1988; 60: 402–4.
Usubiaga JE, Dos Reis A, Usubiaga LE. Epidural misplacement of catheters and mechanisms of unilateral blockade. Anesthesiology 1970; 32: 158–61.
Boezaart AP. Computerized axial tomo-epidurographic and radiographic documentation of unilateral epidural analgesia. Can J Anaesth 1989; 36: 697–700.
Harrison GR, Clowes NWB. The depth of the epidural space from the skin. Anaesthesia 1985; 40: 685–7.
Palmer SK, Abram SE, Maitra AM, von Colditz JH. Distance from the skin to the lumbar epidural space in an obstetric population. Anesth Analg 1983; 62: 944–6.
Sanchez R, Acuna L, Rocha F. An analysis of the radiological visualization of the catheters placed in the epidural space. Br J Anaesth 1967; 39: 485–9.
Philips DC, MacDonald R. Epidural catheter migration during labour. Anaesthesia 1987; 42: 661–3.
Cherala SR, Sheth R, Mehta D, Greene RI. Fixing the epidural catheter in place — the way we see it. Regional Anesthesia 1989; 14: 158.
Pither C, Hartrick C. Postoperative pain.In: Raj PP(Ed.). Handbook of Regional Anesthesia. New York: Churchill Livingstone 1985: 99–108.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crosby, E.T. Epidural catheter migration during labour: an hypothesis for inadequate analgesia. Can J Anaesth 37, 789–793 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03006538
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03006538