Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of bupivacaine and tetracaine in epidural analgesia for surgery

  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The new long-acting local anaesthetic, bupivacaine, has been compared with tetracaine using a 0.5 per cent solution for epidural analgesia in 103 surgical patients.

Both agents had almost identical latency of action and dose requirements. Analgesia commenced in 5.8–6.6 minutes and took about 18 minutes to spread to the first sacral segment. Dose requirements in milligrams per spinal segment at twenty years of age were the same for both agents and about one-fifth the amount needed for lignocaine or mepivacaine. The two agents differed appreciably in the qualities of their sensory and motor blockade. Tetracaine caused 66 per cent more motor paralysis of the legs than bupivacaine, whereas the duration of action of bupivacaine (196 minutes) was 20 per cent longer than that of tetracaine. There was suggestive but inconclusive evidence that the intensity of sensory blockade from bupivacaine may be superior to that of tetracaine.

Résumé

Chez 103 opérés soumis à une analgésie épidurale, on a comparé à la tétracaïne le nouvel anesthésique local à action prolongée, la bupivacaïne. On a utilisé la tétracaïne à 0.5 pour cent pour 45 cas, et la bupivacaïne à 0.5 pour cent pour 58 cas.

Les deux agents agissent avec la même rapidité et exigent les mêmes doses. En moyenne l’analgésie s’est manifestée au bout de 5.8 à 6.6 minutes et s’est rendue en 18 minutes au premier segment sacré; toutefois, dans certains cas, ranalgésie de ce segment n’a été obtenue qu’après 25 minutes. Pour les sujets de 20 ans, le nombre de milligrammes requis par segment rachidien a été le méme; ce nombre n’a été que le cinquième de celui qu’on a dû administrer pour la lignocaïne ou la mépivacaïne.

La tétracaïne et la bupivacaïne ont différé sensiblement dans la qualité de leur blocage sensitif et moteur. La tétracaïne a produit 66 pour cent de plus de paralysie des jambes que la bupivacaïne, alors que la durée d’action de la bupivacaïne (196 minutes) a été de 20 pour cent plus longue que celle de la tétracaïne (145 minutes). Il semble, sans qu’on puisse le certifier, que le blocage sensitif de la bupivacaïne soit supérieur à celui de la tétracaïne.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Telivuo, L. A New Long-acting Local Anaesthetic for Pain Relief after Thoracotomy. Ann. chir. et gynaec. Fenniae.52: 513 (1963).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. JORDFELDT, L.; LOFSTROM, R.; PeRNOW, R.; PeRSSON, F., WAHREN, J.J & WlDMAN, B. The Intravenous Toxicity of lac-43 and Mepivacaine in Dog and Man, Evaluated by Physiological Methods. Proc. Ill World Congress of Anesthesiology, Sao Paulo, Tomo I, p. 340 (1964).

  3. Ekblom, L. & Widman, B. A Comparison of the Properties of lac-43, Prilocaine and Mepivacaine in Extradural Anaesthesia. Acta anaesth. scandinav. Suppl. XXI: 33 (1966).

  4. Herbring, B. G. A Comparative Study of lac-43, Mepivacaine and Tetracaine in Caudal Anaesthesia. Acta anaesth. scandinav., Suppl. XXI: 45 (1966).

  5. Korkeila, J. LAC-43: Clinical Experiences with a New Long-acting Local Anaesthetic in Epidural Anaesthesia. Acta anaesth. scandinav., Suppl. XXI: 453 (1966).

  6. Duthie, A. M.;Wyman, J. B.; &Lewis, G. A. Bupivacaine in Labour: Its Use in Lumbar Extradural Analgesia. Anaesthesia.23: 20 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Steel, G. C. &Dawkins, C. J. M. Extradural Lumbar Block with Bupivacaine (Marcain: LAC-43): A Clinical Trial in Lower Abdominal and Perineal Surgery. Anaesthesia.23: 14 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Henn, F. &Brattsand, R. Some Pharmacological and Toxicological Properties of a New Long-Acting Local Analgesic, LAC-43, (Marcaine), in Comparison with Mepivacaine and Tetracaine. Acta anaesth. scandinav.21: 9 (1966).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bromage, P. R. Spread of Analgesic Solutions in the Epidural Space and Their Site of Action: A Statistical Study. Brit. J. Anaesth.34: 161 (1962).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. — Physiology and Pharmacology of Epidural Analgesia: A Review. Anesthesiology.28: 592 (1967).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. — A Comparison of the Hydrochloride and Carbon Dioxide Salts of Lidocaine and Prilocaine in Epidural Analgesia. Acta anaesth. scandinav. Suppl.16: 55 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bromage, P. R. &Burfoot, M. F. Quality of Epidural Blockade: II. Influence of Physiochemical Factors: Hyaluronidase and Potassium. Brit. J. Anaesth.38: 857 (1966).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yaouda, I.;Takahashi, K.;Hashimoto, Y. &Murakami, M. Experimental and Clinical Studies of LAC-43. Shijutsu (Operations).16: 695 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bromage, P. R.;Burfoot, F.;Crowell, D. E.; &Pettigrew, R. T. Quality of Epidural Blockade: I. Influence of Physical Factors. Brit. J. Anesth.36: 342 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lind, B. LAC-43: Et nytt localanaestheticum med lang virkningstid. Tidsk. for den norske laegeforening.85: 1613 (1965).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ekblom, L. &Widman, B. LAC-43 and Tetracaine in Spinal Anesthesia: A Controlled Study. Acta anaesth. scandinav. Suppl.23: 419 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hollmen, B. Experience with LAC-43, a New Anaesthetic with Prolonged Action, in Operative and Therapeutic Epidural and Regional Anaesthesia. Ann. chir. et gynaec. Fenniae.55: 322 (1966).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bromage, P.R. A comparison of bupivacaine and tetracaine in epidural analgesia for surgery. Can. Anaes. Soc. J. 16, 37–45 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03005776

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03005776

Keywords

Navigation