Abstract
This article reports the results of 629 subjects in three experiments designed to replicate and extend the phenomenon of vicarious verbal conditioning. Experiment I replicated the finding that subjects who responded most to vicarious verbal conditioning were aware of the contingency involved. Experiment II attempted to examine the effects of prior history with the verbal reinforcer on vicarious verbal conditioning by providing seven groups of subjects with varying classic conditioning histories prior to vicarious verbal conditioning. The null results associated with this experiment were hypothesized to be due to the fact that the vicarious verbal conditioning took place in a language laboratory where the subjects could hear but not see the model. Experiment III replicated Experiment II in a live group context as was done in Experiment I. The results showed a) that vicarious verbal conditioning was again found to take place, b) that associating the verbal reinforcer with a tone or tone plus money via forward classic conditioning potentiated the effects of the verbal reinforcer, c) that backward classic conditioning did not potentiate the reinforcer, d) nor did either of two sensitization procedures potentiate the effects of the verbal reinforcer. Both aware and unaware subjects evidenced vicarious verbal conditioning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
DeNike, L. D. The temporal relationship between awareness and performance in verbal conditioningJournal of Experimental Psychology, 1964,65, 521–529.
Dulany, D. E. Awareness, rules, and prepositional control: A confrontation with S-R behavior therapy. In T. R. Dixon, and D. L. Horton (Eds.),Verbal Behavior and General Behavior Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1968.
Ferster, C. B., and Skinner, B. F.Schedules of Reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.
Flanders, JP. A review of research on imitative behavior.Psychological Bulletin, 1968,69, 316–337.
Greenspoon, J. The reinforcing effect of two spoken sounds on the frequency of two responses.American Journal of Psychology, 1955,65, 409–416.
Hamilton, D. L., Thompson, J. J., and White, A. M. Role of awareness and intentions in observational learning.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970,16, 689–694.
Kanfer, F. H. Verbal conditioning: A review of its current status. In T. R. Dixon, and D. L. Horton (Eds.),Verbal Behavior and General Behavior Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1968.
Krasner, L. Studies of the conditioning of verbal behavior.Psychological Bulletin, 1958,55, 148–170.
Miller, A. W., Jr., and Rumans, J. Taffel and Greenspoon: Comparative effects of obviousness of reinforcement in response structure.Journal of General Psychology, 1970,83, 43–51.
Spielberger, C. D. Theoretical and epistemological issues in verbal conditioning. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.),Directions in Psycholinguistics. New York: Macmillan, 1965.
Spielberger, C. D., Levin, S. M., and Shepard, M. C. The effects of awareness and attitude toward the reinforcement on the operant conditioning of verbal behavior.Journal of Personality, 1962,30, 106–121.
Taffel, C. Anxiety and the conditioning of verbal behavior.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1955,51, 496–501.
Winer, B.J. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article is based upon dissertation research submitted by the first author to Fordham University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Donohue, G.B., Tryon, W.W. A functional analysis of social reinforcement in vicarious verbal conditioning. Pav. J. Biol. Sci. 20, 140–148 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03003597
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03003597