Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

The evoked cardiac response (ECR) of heart rate deceleration, respiratory pause, the peripheral pulse amplitude response (PPAR) of vascular constriction, and the galvanic skin response (GSR) were recorded from 20 subjects presented with a series of brief target and nontarget stimuli in a random order. Prestimulus vigilance was equivalent for the two types of stimuli since each had to be identified as target or nontarget before being processed, or ignored, respectively. This difference in signal value following identification affected only the GSR, supporting a conceptualization of preliminary processes in orienting response (OR) elicitation rather than Sokolov’s unitary OR concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barry, R. J.: Low intensity auditory stimuli and the GSR orienting response.Physiological Psychology, 5:98–100, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R. J.: Failure to find the “local” EEG OR to low-level auditory stimulation.Physiological Psychology, 4:171–174, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R. J.: Failure to find evidence of the unitary OR concept with indifferent low-intensity auditory stimuli.Physiological Psychology, 5:89–96, 1977a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R. J.: The effect of “significance” upon indices of Sokolov’s orienting response: A new conceptualization to replace the OR.Physiological Psychology, 5:209–214, 1977b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R. J.: Disruption of sinus arrhythmia and its relation to the classification of non-habituating OR measures.Physiology and Behavior, 21:25–27, 1978a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R. J.: Physiological changes in a reaction-time task: Further problems with Sokolov’s dimension of stimulus “significance.”Physiological Psychology, 6:438–444, 1978b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R. J.: A factor analytic examination of the unitary OR concept.Biological Psychology, 8:161–178, 1979.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R. J., and James, A. L.: Fractionation of phasic responses in a dishabituation paradigm.Physiology and Behavior, 26:69–75, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R. J., and James, A. L.: Fractionation of respiratory and vascular responses with simple visual stimulation.Physiological Psychology (In press).

  • Becker, D. E., and Shapiro, D.: Directing attention towards stimuli affects the P300 but not the orienting response.Psychophysiology, 17:385–389, 1980.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, A. S.: The orienting response as noveltyand significance detector: Reply to O’Gorman.Psychophysiology, 16:263–271, 1979.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furedy, J. J., and Arabian, J. M.: A Pavlovian psychophysiological perspective on the OR: The facts of the matter. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. van Olst, and J. F. Orlebeke (Eds.):The Orienting Reflex in Humans. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, S., and Furedy, J. J.: Stimulus repetition, change and assessments of sensitivities of and relationships among an electrodermal and two plethysmographic components of the orienting reaction.Psychophysiology, 11:35–43, 1974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, F. K.: Habituation and dishabituation of responses innervated by the autonomic nervous system. In H. V. S. Peeke and M. J. Herz (Eds.):Habituation. New York: Academic Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, P. M., and Thompson, R. F.: Habituation: A dual-process theory.Psychological Review, 77:419–450, 1970.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • James, A. L., and Barry, R. J.: Respiratory and vascular responses to simple visual stimuli in autistics, retardates and normals.Psychophysiology, 17:541–547, 1980.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D.:Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltzman, I.: Orienting reflexes and significance: A reply to O’Gorman.Psychophysiology, 6:274–282, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltzman, I., Gould, J., Barnett, O. J., Raskin, D. C., and Wolf, C.: Habituation of the GSR and digital vasomotor components of the orienting reflex as a consequence of task instructions and sex differences.Physiological Psychology, 7:213–220, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Olst, E. H., Heemstra, M. L., and ten Kortenaar, T.: Stimulus significance and the orienting reaction. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. van Holst, and J. F. Orlebeke (Eds.):The Orienting Reflex in Humans. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poor, D. D. S.: Analysis of variance for repeated measures designs: Two approaches.Psychological Bulletin, 80:204–209, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, R. L., Piroch, J. F., and Kimmel, H. D.: The effect of task and stimulus variability on habituation of electrodermal and vasomotor reactions.Physiological Psychology, 5:189–196, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddle, D. A. T., and Heron, P. A.: Effects of length of training and amount of tone intensity change on amplitude of autonomic components of the orienting response.Australian Journal of Psychology, 29:7–16, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, E. N.: The higher nervous activity and the problem of perception.Acta Psychologica, 13:134–135, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, E. N.: Neuronal models and the orienting reflex. In M. A. Brazier (Ed.):The Central Nervous System and Behavior. New York: Macey, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, E. N.:Perception and the Conditioned Reflex. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barry, R.J. Signal value and preliminary processes in or elicitation. Pav. J. Biol. Sci. 16, 144–150 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03003219

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03003219

Keywords

Navigation