Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning

An evaluative review
  • Mary Crawford
  • Fred A. Masterson
Article

Abstract

Bolles (1970) proposed a theory of avoidance learning, the species-specific defense reaction (SSDR) hypothesis, which emphasized innate constraints on the response repertoire of rats in aversive situations and minimized the role of reinforcement in avoidance learning. The present paper describes Bolles’ (1970, 1971, 1972, 1975, 1978) development of SSDR theory and reviews the empirical tests of its assumptions and predictions. It is concluded that the SSDRs described by Bolles, along with some others, are highly probable in aversive situations but that the response repertoire is not limited to them. Further, there is strong evidence for reinforcement effects in the establishment and maintenance of at least some avoidance responses.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Azrin, N. H., Hutchinson, R. R., and McLaughlin, R. The opportunity for aggression as an operant reinforcer during aversive stimulation.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1965,8, 171–180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartter, W. D., and Masterson, F. A. Is there signtracking in aversive conditioning?Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1980,15, 87–89.Google Scholar
  3. Bindra, D. A unified account of classical conditioning and operant training. In W. F. Prokasy and A. H. Black (Eds.).Classical Conditioning. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. Bindra, D. A motivational view of learning, performance, and behavior.Psychological Review, 1974,79, 394–409.Google Scholar
  5. Bindra, D. How adaptive behavior is produced: A perceptual-motivational alternative to responsereinforcement.The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1978,1, 41–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchard, R. J., and Blanchard, D. C. Defensive reactions in the albino rat.Learning and Motivation, 1971,2, 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchard, R. J., and Blanchard, D. C. Effects of hippocampal lesions on the rat’s reaction to a cat.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972,78, 77–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolles, R. C. Avoidance and escape learning: Simultaneous acquisition of different responses.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969,68, 355–358.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolles, R. C. Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning.Psychological Review, 1970,71, 32–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bolles, R. C. Species-specific defense reactions. In F. R. Brush (Ed.)Aversive Conditioning and Learning. New York: Academic Press. 1971.Google Scholar
  11. Bolles, R. C. Reinforcement, expectancy, and learning.Psychological Review, 1972a,79, 394–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bolles, R. C. The avoidance learning problem. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 6. New York: Academic Press, 1972b.Google Scholar
  13. Bolles, R. C.Theory of Motivation. 2nd Edition. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.Google Scholar
  14. Bolles, R. C. The role of stimulus learning in defensive behavior. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, and W. K. Honig (Eds.),Cognitive Processes in Animal Behavior. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1978.Google Scholar
  15. Bolles, R. C., and Grossen, N. E. Effects of an informational stimulus on the acquisition of avoidance behaviors in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969,68, 90–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bolles, R. C., and Riley, A. L. Freezing as an avoidance response: Another look at the operant-respondent distinction.Learning and Motivation, 1973,4, 268–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bolles, R. C., and Seelbach, S. E. Punishing and reinforcing effects of noise onset and termination for different responses.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1964,58, 127–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bolles, R. C., Stokes, L. W., and Younger, M. S. Does CS termination reinforce avoidance behavior?Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1966,62, 201–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bolles, R. C., and Tuttle, A. V. A failure to reinforce instrumental behavior by terminating a stimulus that had been paired with shock.Psychonomic Science, 1967,9, 255–256.Google Scholar
  20. Brown, P. L., and Jenkins, H. M. Auto-shaping of the pigeon’s keypeck.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968,11, 1–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coons, E. E., Anderson, N. H., and Myers, A. K. Disappearance of avoidance responding during continued training.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1960,52, 290–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crawford, M., and Masterson, F. A. Components of the flight response can reinforce bar-press avoidance learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1978,4, 144–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crawford, M., Masterson, F. A., Thomas, L. A., and Ellerbrock, G. Defensive behavior and passive avoidance learning in rats and gerbils.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1981,18, 121–124.Google Scholar
  24. Crawford, M., Masterson, F. A., and Wilson, D. Species-specific defense reactions in escape-fromfear situations.Animal Learning and Behavior, 1977,5, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. D’Amato, M. R., and Schiff, D. Long-term discriminated avoidance performance in the rat.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1964,57, 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Davis, H., and Burton, J. The measurement of response force during lever-press shock-escape procedure in rats.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 1974,22, 433–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Davis, H., and Burton, J. Reinforcement of lever holding by avoidance of shock.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976,8, 617–620.Google Scholar
  28. Davis, H., Hirschhorn, R., and Hurwitz, H. M. B. Lever holding behavior during a leverlift shock escape procedure.Animal Learning and Behavior, 1973,1, 215–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Green, L. Are there two classes of classicallyconditioned responses?Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 1978,13, 154–162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Green, L., and Rachlin, H. On the directionality of key pecking during signals for appetitive and aversive events.Learning and Motivation, 1977,8, 551–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grossen, N. E., and Kelley, M. J. Species-specific behavior and acquisition of avoidance behavior in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972,81, 307–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hineline, P. N., and Harrison, J. F. Lever biting as an avoidance response.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1978,11, 223–226.Google Scholar
  33. Kamin, L. J. The effects of termination of the CS and avoidance of the US on avoidance learning.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1956,49, 420–424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knutson, J. F. The effects of shocking one member of a pair of rats.Psychonomic Science. 1971,22, 265–266.Google Scholar
  35. Leclerc, R., and Reberg, D. Sign-tracking in aversive conditioning.Learning and Motivation, 1980,11, 302–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maatsch, J. L Learning and fixation after a single shock trial.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1959,52, 408–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maier, S. F., Anderson, C., and Lieberman, D. A. Influence of control of shock on subsequent shockelicited aggression.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972,81, 94–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Masterson, F. A. Is termination of a warning signal an effective reward for the rat?Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1970,72, 471–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Masterson, F., and Crawford, M. The defense motivation system: A theory of avoidance behavior.The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1982 (In press).Google Scholar
  40. Masterson, F. A., Crawford, M., and Bartter, W. Brief escape from a dangerous place: The role of reinforcement in the rat’s one-way avoidance acquisition.Learning and Motivation, 1978,9, 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Masterson, F. A., Whipple, M. C., and Benner, S. The role of proprioceptive stimulus change in the rat’s avoidance learning.Psychonomic Science, 1972,27, 260–262.Google Scholar
  42. Meyer, D. R., Cho, C., and Wesemann, A. F. On problems of conditioning discriminated lever press avoidance responses.Psychological Review, 1960,67, 224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mineka, S. The role of fear in theories of avoidance learning, flooding, and extinction.Psychological Bulletin, 1979,86, 985–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Modaresi, H. A. One-way characteristic performance of rats under two-way signalled avoidance conditions.Learning and Motivation, 1975,6, 484–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mogenson, G. J., Mullin, A. D., and Clark, E. A. Effects of delayed secondary reinforcement and response requirements on avoidance learning.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1965,19, 61–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Morris, R. G. M. Preconditioning of reinforcing properties to an exteroceptive feedback stimulus.Learning and Motivation, 1975,6, 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mowrer, O. H. On the dual nature of learning: A reinterpretation of “conditioning” and “problemsolving.”Harvard Educational Review, 1947,17, 102–148.Google Scholar
  48. Mowrer, O. H. Two-factor learning theory reconsidered, with special reference to secondary reinforcement and the concept of habit.Psychological Review, 1956,63, 114–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mowrer, O. H.Learning Theory and Behavior. New York: Wiley, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mowrer, O. H., and Lamoreaux, R. R. Fear as an intervening variable in avoidance conditioning.Journal of Comparative Psychology. 1946,39, 29–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Myer, J. S., and. Baenninger, R. Some effects of punishment and stress on mouse killing by rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1966,62, 292–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peterson, M. R., and Lyon, D. An application of the species-specific defense reaction hypothesis.The Psychological Record, 1975,25, 21–37.Google Scholar
  53. Pinel, J. P. J., and Treit, D. Burying as a defensive response in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1978,92, 708–712. 214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rakover, S. S. Tolerance of pain as a measure of fear.Learning and Motivation, 1975,6, 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rescorla, R. A., and LoLordo, V. M. Inhibition of avoidance behavior.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1965,59, 406–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rescorla, R. A., and Solomon, R. L. Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning.Psychological Review, 1967,7, 151–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Riess, D. Shuttleboxes, Skinner boxes, and Sidman avoidance in rats: Acquisition and terminal performance as a function of response topography.Psychonomic Science, 1971,25, 283–286.Google Scholar
  58. Seligman, M. E. P., and Hager, J.Biological Boundaries of Learning. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. 1972.Google Scholar
  59. Seligman, M. E. P., and Johnston, J. C. A cognitive theory of avoidance learning. In F. J. McGuigan and D. B. Lumsden (Eds.),Contemporary Approaches to Conditioning and Learning. Washington, D. C.: Winston, 1973.Google Scholar
  60. Sheffield, F. D. New evidence on the drive-induction theory of reinforcement. In R. N. Haber (Ed.),Current Research in Motivation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1966.Google Scholar
  61. Theios, J., and Dunaway, J. E. One-way versus shuttle avoidance conditioning.Psychonomic Science, 1964,1, 251–252.Google Scholar
  62. Theios, J., Lynch, A. D., and Lowe, W. F. Differential effects of shock intensity on one-way and shuttle avoidance conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966,72, 294–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ulrich, R. E., and Azrin, N. H. Reflexive fighting in response to aversive stimulation.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1962,5, 511–520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wasserman, E. A., Franklin, S. R., and Hearst, E. Pavlovian appetitive contingencies and approach versus withdrawal to conditioned stimuli in pigeons.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1974,86, 616–627.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Crawford
    • 1
  • Fred A. Masterson
    • 2
  1. 1.West Chester State CollegeWest Chester
  2. 2.University of DelawareNewark

Personalised recommendations