Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Several ambiguities in the present terminology of behavior theory obscure some important theoretical assumptions and experimental details in current research. Left unclarified, such ambiguities impede the accurate analysis of laboratory procedures, and prevent reliable communication among researchers. This paper focuses on the term “schedule of reinforcement.” It points out that two distinguishable operational rules are implicated in the term: in the case where reinforcement is of the so-called response contingent type, the “schedule” is really a rule to identify the response to be reinforced; in the case of non-contingent reinforcement, the “schedule” is truly a rule for delivery of reinforcement. Other terminological ambiguities that are encountered in a discussion of this term include “reinforcement” and “intermittency.” A resolution of these problems will necessarily involve the procedures of non-contingent reinforcement, and the parameter of reinforcement probability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Schoenfeld, W. N.: “Avoidance” in behavior theory.J. Exp. Anal. Behavior,12:669–674, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, W. N., and Cole, B. K.: Behavioral control by intermittent stimulation.In R. M. Gilbert, and J. R. Millenson (Eds.), Reinforcement: Behavioral analysis. New York, Academic Press, 1972(a); pp. 147–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, W. N., and Cole, B. K., with Blaustem, J., Lachter, G., Martin, J., and Vickery, C.: Stimulus schedules: The t-τ systems. New York, Harper and Row, 1972(b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, W. N., Cole, B. K., Lang, J., and Mankoff, R.: “Contingency” in behavior theory.In F. J. McGuigan, and D. B. Lumsden (Eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Conditioning and Learning. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1973; pp. 151–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, W. N., and Farmer, J.: Reinforcement schedules and the “behavior stream.”In W. N. Schoenfeld (Ed.), The Theory of Reinforcement Schedules. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970; pp. 215–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F.: The generic nature of the concepts of stimulus and responseJ. Gen. Psychol.,12:40–65, 1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F.: “Superstition” in the pigeon.J. Exp. Psychol.,38:168–172, 1948.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schoenfeld, W.N., Cole, B.K. What is a “schedule of reinforcement”?. Pav. J. Biol. Sci. 10, 52–61 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03000622

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03000622

Keywords

Navigation