Abstract
Most reports arising from operant conditioning procedures have little or no emphasis on the actual behavior shaping or acquisition phase of the responses which are the cumulative frequency of the well-practiced act. There is a need for more detail for beginners or those desiring a clearer understanding of procedures leading to the finally reported data. The procedure reported here is typically used to compare animal subjects or conditions, such as drugs, both in the acquisition and final phases of behavior.
Beginning with an unconditional response (e.g. feeding) a bridging stimulus is paired in classical conditioning fashion. From that point on the bridging stimulus and UCS (feeding—or shock) are used immediately as reward or reinforcement only for responses “in the direction of the final desired behavior. The number of timed standardized behavior shaping sessions to criterion is the best index of acquisition phase performance and the total number bar presses or the rate of bar pressing (slope) is the usual index of operant responding. With timid animals it is often necessary to administer tranquilizers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Breland, K., and Breland, M.:Animal Behavior. New York, The Macmillan Company; London, Collier-Macmillan Limited, 1966.
Murphree, O. D., Dykman, R. A., and Peters, J. E.: Operant conditioning of two strains of the pointer dog.Psychophysiol.,3:414–417, 1967.
Murphree, O. D., and Newton, J. E. O.: Schizokinesis: Fragmentation of performance in two strains of pointer dogs.Cond. Reflex,6:91–100, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murphree, O.D. Procedure for operant conditioning of the dog. Pav. J. Biol. Sci. 9, 46–50 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03000502
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03000502