Skip to main content
Log in

Phenolphthalein as a dilution indicator in gastric analysis

  • Published:
The American Journal of Digestive Diseases

Conclusion

We have demonstrated the existence of two possible sources of error in the use of phenolphthalein as a dilution indicator in gastric analyses. (1) The solubility of phenolphthalein in the acid form, both in water and in dilute alcohol, is considerably lower than the concentration which it is necessary to employ in a test meal. Even if the latter be prepared immediately before it is administered to the subject, in the course of a two hour Rehfuss series determination a considerable amount will be lost by precipitation in the stomach and by filtration of the specimens to remove mucin and other solids preparatory to colorimetry. (2) Phenolphthalein, at a concentration of 10 mgm. per 100 ml. and a pH of about 12, the lowest pH value compatible with maximum conversion of the indicator to its red salt form, loses color at a significant rate. The second of these errors can be obviated by not alkalinizing the phenolphthalein solutions until just before they are introduced into the colorimeter cups for reading, but the first error constitutes an insurmountable barrier to the use of the substance as a dilution indicator. It follows, therefore, that all previous work based on the use of phenolphthalein in this way involves one or both of these errors unless otherwise demonstrated and should be repeated with the aid of a more reliable substance. To this end we have investigated phenol red. Our results indicate that this indicator possesses neither of the disadvantages of phenolphthalein, since it is soluble in the acid form and the rate of decolorization of the red alkali salt at pH 11–12 is so slow as to be insignificant. A preliminary report of this work has already been published (Hollander, Penner and Saltzman (11)).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bloomfield, A. L. and Keefer, C. S.:Arch. Int. Med., 37, 819, 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gorham, F. D.:J. A. M. A., 81, 1738, 1923.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lanz, W.:Arch. klin. Chir., 115, 294, 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bloomfield, A. L. and Keefer, C. S.:J. A. M. A., 88, 707, 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fantus, B. and Dyniewicz, J. M.:Am. J. Dig. Dis. and Nutrit., 3, 573, 1936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Utz, F.:Suddeut. Apoth. Ztg., 60, 430, 442, 1920; quoted inChem. Abstr., 15, 1236, 1921.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Seidell, A.: Solubilities of Inorganic and Organic Compounds. Supplement to 2nd Ed., N. Y., 1928.

  8. Michaelis, L. and Gyemant, A.:Bioch Z., 109, 165, 1920.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lund, H.:Beretn. Skand. Naturforsk., (18th meeting), 412, 1929; quoted inChem. Abstr., 24, 3659, 1930.

  10. Thiel, A.:Monatsh. fur Chemie, 53, 1008, 1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hollander, F., Penner, A. and Saltzman, M.:Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. and Med., 36, 568, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

From the Laboratories of The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hollander, F., Penner, A. & Saltzman, M. Phenolphthalein as a dilution indicator in gastric analysis. American Journal of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition 4, 364–366 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02999933

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02999933

Keywords

Navigation