Skip to main content
Log in

The problem of infection in gall bladder disease with a report on the experimental production of cholecystitis

  • Clinical Medicine: Diseases Of Digestion
  • Published:
The American Journal of Digestive Diseases

Conclusions

1. In a composite review of two thousand one hundred sixty-two cases of cholecystitis studied bacteriologically following cholecystectomies, more than forty-five per cent yielded positive cultures from the gall bladder wall, more than twenty-nine per cent from the contents of the gall bladder.

2. Many bacteria were obtained, but most common were the streptococcic, colon-typhoid and the staphylococcic groups.

3. From an experimental standpoint cholecystitis can be produced by a variety of organisms. There appear to be no specific bacteria.

4. Foci of infection appear to play the primary etiologicrôle and may be divided into two regions, the head and bowel.

5. The elective localization of bacteria as an hypothesis is open to question.

6. The route by which bacteria reach the gall bladder in the majority of instances appears to be by way of the blood stream.

7. In general, from this study we are inclined to believe that almost one-half of the cases of gall bladder disease seen clinically are bacterial in origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  1. Rosenow, E. C.: Elective Localization of the Streptococeus—Pneumococcus Group as a Factor in the Production of Disease.Ann. of Clin. Med., 1922; 23:211.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenow, E. C.: Focal Infection and Elective Localization of Bacteria in Appendicitis, Ulcer of the Stomach, Cholecystitis and Pancreatitis.Surg., Gyne. and Obst., 1921; 33:19.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenow, E. C.: Focal Infection and Elective Localization, “International Clinics,” series 40, vol. 2:29.

  4. Brown, R. O.: A study on the Etiology of Cholecystitis and its Production by the Injection of Streptococci.Arch., Int. Med., 1919; 23:185.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McKee and Judd: Cholecystitis. Bacteriologic and Experimental Study of Three Hundred Surgically Resected Gall Bladders.Surg., Gyne. and Obst., 1930; 1:655.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boardman, W. W.: A Study of the Bacteriological Findings in the Lyon-Meltzer Test.Am. Jour. of Med. Sc., 1924; 167:847.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smithies, Karshner and Oleson: Non-surgical Drainage of the Biliary Tract.J. A. M. A, 1921; 77:2036.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Drennan, J. G.: Bacteriologic Study of the Fluid Contents of One Hundred Gall Bladders Removed at Operation.Ann. of Surg., 1922; 76:482.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moynihan, B.: The Gall Bladder and its Infections.Brit Med. Jour., 1928; 1:1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Branch, Chas. F.: Bacteriological Study of a Group of Diseased Gall Bladders.New Eng. Jour. of Med., 1929; 201:308.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenow, E. C.: The Etiology of Cholecystitis and Gall Stones and their Production by the Intravenous Injection of Bacteria.Jour. of Infect. Dis., 1916; 19:527.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wilkie, D. P. D.: Some Aspects of Gall Bladder Disease.Brit. Med. Jour., 1928; 1:481.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilkie, D. P. D.: Remarks on the Gall Bladder in Relation to Focal Infection.Brit Med. Jour., 1929; 2:37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilkie, A. L.: The Bacteriology of Cholecystitis. A Clinical and Experimental Study.Brit. Jour. of Surg., 1928; 15:450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Denton, James.: The Mode of Origin of Gall Bladder Lesions.Arch. of Surg., 1927; 1:1.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Illingworth, C. F. W.: Types of Gall Bladder Infection. A Study of One Hundred Operative Cases.Brit. Jour. of Surg., 1927; 15:221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson, W. O.: One Hundred Consecutive Cholecystectomies.Amer. Jour. Med. Sc., 1925: 170:181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bond, C. J.: An Address on Ascending Currents in Mucous Canals and Gland Ducts and Their Influence on Infection.Brit. Med. Jour., 1905; 2:232.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Graham and Peterman: Further Observations on the Lymphatic Origin of Cholecystitis. Choledochitis and the Associated Pancreatitis.Arch. of Surg., 1922; 4:23.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Walton, A. J.: Some Modern Aspects of Cholecystitis and Cholelithiasis.Lancet, 1930; 1:334.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mann, F. C.: Production by Chemical Means of a Specific Cholecystitis.Am. of Surg., 1921; 73:54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Boyd, W.: Studies in Gall Bladder Pathology.Brit. Jour. of Surg., 1923; 10:337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Starling, E. H.: Principles of Human Physiology.J. and A., Churchill, 1930.

  24. Deaver, J. B.: Etiology of Gall Bladder Disease.Penn. Med. Jour., 1929; 13.

  25. Patey and Whitby: The Paths of Gall Bladder Infection—An Experimental Study.Brit. Jour. of Surg., 1932; 20:580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Magner and Hutcheson: Cholecystitis—A Bacteriological and Experimental Study.Canadian Med. Ass. Jour., 1932; 27:460.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Williams and McLachlan: The Etiology of Cholecystitis. Bacteriological Observations.Lancet, 1930; 2:342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gordon-Taylor and Whitby: A Bacteriological Study of Fifty Cases of Cholecystectomy with Special Reference to Anaerobic Infections.Brit. Jour. Surg., 1930; 18:78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

From the Frankford Foundation for Medical Research, Philadelphia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rehfuss, M.E., Nelson, G.M. The problem of infection in gall bladder disease with a report on the experimental production of cholecystitis. American Journal of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition 1, 759–767 (1934). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02999601

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02999601

Keywords

Navigation