Skip to main content
Log in

The importance of preliminary films in a routine examination of the abdomen

  • Roentgenology
  • Published:
The American Journal of Digestive Diseases

Summary

This brief outline of the preliminary film in reference to various conditions of the abdomen may serve to point out the intrinsic value of this procedure in diagnostic work. The preliminary film procedure is simple, without discomfort to the patient, and is a definite aid in diagnosing abdominal conditions which are not evident clinically. It may also serve as a means of controlling a faulty diagnosis and it can assist in designating the site of acute conditions. Because of this triple function of the preliminary film procedure, it is to be recommended as a routine procedure in all cases of abdominal complaints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mondor, H.: Diagnostics Urgents, Abdomen. Paris, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Assmann, H.: Klinische Röntgen Diagnostik der Inner Erkrankungen. Berlin, 1934.

  3. Singer, Harry A.: The Diagnosis of Perforated Peptic Ulcer, International Clinics, Vol. II, pp. 55–57, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kraas, E.: Die Röntgenologischen Zeichen des Darmverschlusses,Chirurgie, Vol. II, pp. 829–833, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vaughn, Roger T., and Singer, Harry A.: The Value of Radiology in the Diagnosis of Perforated Peptic Ulcer.S. G. O., Vol. 49, p. 593, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vaughn and Singer: Further Observations of the Value of Radiology in the Diagnosis of Perforated Ulcer.Am. Jour. Surg., Vol. 21, pp. 465–467, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Singer: The Value of X-ray in the Diagnosis of Acute Abdominal Affectations. Medical Clinic of North America, Vol. 18, p. 421, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ginsberg, L.: Art Cit.Ann. of Surg., Vol. 96, pp. 368–380, 1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Klober, Hans: Die Röntgendiagnose des Ileus ohne Kontrastmittel.Archiv für klinische Chirurgie, Vol. 112, p. 513, 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brooksher, W. R., Jr.: The X-ray Diagnosis of Acute Intestinal Obstruction.Internat. Jour. Med. and Surg., Vol. 45, p. 416, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ochsner, A., and Granger, H.: The Röentgen Diagnosis of Ileus.Ann. of Surg., Vol. 92, pp. 947–954, 1930.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Durst, H., and Utzschneider, S.: Beitrag zur Röntgendiagnose des Darmverchlusses.München med. Wchnschr., Vol. 79, pp. 597–600, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wangensteen, O. H.: Elaboration of Criteria upon which the early diagnosis of acute intestinal obstruction may be made with special consideration of the value of X-ray evidence.Rediology, Vol. 17, pp. 44–62, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rabwin, M. H.: The Roentgen-Ray Diagnosis of Acute Intestinal Obstruction.Am. Jour. Surg., Vol. 7, pp. 656–658, 1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Case, J. T.: Roentgenological Aid in the Diagnosis of Ileus.Am. Jour. of Roentgenol., Vol. 19, pp. 413–425, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mundor, H., and Porcher, P.: Examen radiologique d’urgence des peritonites par perforation du tube digestif.Jour. de Chirurgie, Vol. 42, pp. 29–43, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Poreaux, J.: Le retard du transit iléo-caecal et l’état hypertonique du caeco-ascendant dans leurs rapports avec l’appendicite; contribution ä l’étude du syndrome radiologique indirect de l’appendicite chronique. Paris, 1929.

  18. Holden, W. B.: Intestinal obstruction, a survey of 135 personal cases.Arch. of Surg., Vol. 13, pp. 882–886, 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heacock, C. H.: Obstruction lesions of the small bowel.Radiology, Vol. 17, pp. 119–135, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Arnold, W.: Zur Röntgendiagnose der Leberechinokokkus.Deutsch. Med. Wchnschr., Vol. 51, p. 655, 1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jarcho, Julius: Pelvis in Obstetrics. New York, 1933.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

From the X-ray service of Dr. George Plehn, City Hospital, New York City.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klein, I. The importance of preliminary films in a routine examination of the abdomen. American Journal of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition 3, 832–835 (1936). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02999278

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02999278

Keywords

Navigation