Skip to main content

Eustachian tube function test: a new dimension in the management of CSOM

Abstract

Poor eustachian tube function is a major cause of both failure of tympanoplasty as well as the persistence of otorrhoea in chronic suppurative otiis media. In this study, Eustachian tube function tests were carried out on 631 ears of CSOM using an impedance audiometer and the results were analysed. The study showed that impaired tubal function is not only the major cause of persistent/recurrent otorrhoea in CSOM but is also an important contributory factor for failure of tympanoplasty: The results of tympanoplasty were found to be significantly poor when carried out in ears having poor tubal function as compared to ears with normal tubal function.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Foggia DA, McCable BF (1990): Homograft tympanoplasty: the Iowa experience American journal of Otology 11(5) 307–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Palva T (1987), Surgical treatment of Chronic middle ear disease, Myringoplasty and tympanoplasty. Acta Otolaryngologica 104(3-4); 179–84.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Black Jk, Hickey SA; Wormald P (1995): An analysis of the results of myringoplasty in children. International journal of Pediatric Otolaryngology, 3(1); 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Perlman HB: (1967) Normal tubal function. Arch Otolaryngol 86:58.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ingelstedt S et al (1967) Mechanics of Human Middle ear Acta Otolarngol Suppl. 228.

  6. KodammaA, et al. (1994); A ventilation capacity test for the Eustachian tube using a sound-proof pressure chamber. Act Otolaryngol Suppl. (Stockh). 510:99–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jahn A.F. (1996) Eustachian tube faction and the middle ear- editorial in Indian Journal of Otology vol. 2. No. 4 pp 151–153.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Morimitsu T, et al. (1981); A new test of Eustachian tube function with otoadmittance meter: tubotympanometry. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh); 1981 Mar-Apr; 9(3-4);207–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Murti KG, et al.: (1980); Sonomctric evaluation of eustachian tube function using broadband stimuli; Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl.; May-Jun; 89(3 pt 2): 178–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jahn AF (1992): Experimental applications of porous (coralline hydroxylapatite in middle ear and mastoid reconstruction. Laryngoscope.

  11. Palva T., Mattila T., Jauhiainen T. (1987): Comparison of puretones and noise stimuli in sonotubometry Ada Otolarynglogica 103(3-4): 212–216.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yagi N., Haj T., Honjo I.(1987): Eustachian tube patency detected by a photoelctric method. Laryngoscope;97(6):732–36.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Riedel CL, Wiley TL, Block MC (1987): Tympanometric measures eustachian tube function. Journal ofSpeech & Hearing Research.

  14. Cimenez R., Marco-Algarra J., Carbonell R., Prognostic factors in tympanoplasty: (1993) a statistical evaluation. Revue de Laryngologie Otologie Rhinologie; 114(5):335–37.

    Google Scholar 

  15. El-Cuindy A,(1993): Manometric and endoscpic study of tubal function in drum perforation American Journal of Otology; 14(6):580–84.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jahn, A.F, (1993): Middle ear ventilation with the Hydroxy Vent (TM) tube: Review of the initial series. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery; 108(6): 701–705.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yung MW: (1998) Permanent mastoid vent; a new treatment for persistent eustachian tube obstruction Clin. Otolaryngol Vol. 23.

  18. Bluestone CD et al:(1972) Roentgenographic evaluation of eusatchian tube function infants with cleft and normal palets. Cleft Palete Journal 9:93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biswas, A. Eustachian tube function test: a new dimension in the management of CSOM. IJO & HNS 51, 14–22 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02997984

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02997984

Key words

  • Eustachian tube function test
  • Toynbee‘s test
  • William‘s test
  • Impedance Audiometry
  • CSOM