Skip to main content
Log in

Considerations on the diagnosis of large gastric ulcers and implications as to treatment

  • Published:
The American Journal of Digestive Diseases

Summary

From the above discussion, it is evident that large gastric ulcers are significantly more often malignant than are smaller lesions. The hazards confronting the clinician, roentgenologist, and gastroscopist in the differential diagnosis of large gastric ulcers are great and this fact needs to be re-emphasized. The results of this study of large gastric ulcers, extending over a period of 10 years, support similar previous reports (9) showing that there is nothing in the history, physical examination, laboratory tests, findings on X-ray study gastroscopy, or in the results of medical treatment which wilhunfailingly differentiate a benign from a malignant gastric ulcer. In some cases only the histologic examination of the excised lesion will lead to correct diagnosis.

The therapeutic implications of the foregoing considerations would seem to be clear. To the writer, as to many others (10), the observations here reported suggest the advisability of resecting every large gastric ulcer. As pointed out in a previous paper (11), resection of large gastric ulcers is advisable not only because of the danger of misdiagnosing a malignant lesion as benign, but also because the complications of these large gastric ulcers make them in a way malignant when they are histologically benign. We advise surgery for large gastric ulcers even though we are aware of Bloomfield’s (12) conclusion that errors in differential diagnosis do not exceed the mortality rate of resection. This conclusion seems inapplicable to the clinic where I work where the mortality from operation is not high.

For years I followed the plan of closely observing our patients with large gastric ulcers until the lesion was completely healed. The results, however, were not entirely satisfactory inasmuch as even when the lesion was not malignant, we frequently saw recurrences and complications after apparent complete healing and finally we often had to operate. From such observations, I would hesitate to say that there is such a thing as complete healing of a large gastric ulcer on medical treatment. The excellent paper by Palmer (13) and his associates supports this view. Considering, therefore, the complications that may arise from large gastric ulcers, even when they are benign, and the possibility that they may be carcinomatous, it seems to me that one can never rest content until such a lesion is resected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alvarez, W. C. and MacCarty, W. C.: The Sizes of Eesected Gastric Ulcers and Gastric Carcinomas.J. A. M. A., 91:226–231, July 28, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Phillips, C. E.: Surgical Treatment of Stomach Ulcer.California and Western Med., 46:169, March, 1937.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Haudek, M.: Die Roentgendiagnose des Kallosen (penetrierenden) Magengeschwüres und ihre Bedeutung.Munch. Med. Wchnschr., 57:2463–2467, Nov. 22, 1910. b. Idem-Radiologische Beitrage zur Diagnostik des Ulcus und Carcinoma Ventriculi.Munch. Med. Wchnschr., 58:399-404, Feb. 21, 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Freedman, E. and Goehring, H. D.: Diagnostic Errors in Ulcer-ative Lesions of the Stomach and Duodenum.Am. J. Roent., 44:48–58, July, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rivers, A. B. and Dry, T. J.: Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Gastric Ulcers.Arch. Surg., 30:702–715, April, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eusterman, G. B.: Carcinomatous Gastric Ulcer-Misleading Results of Medical Therapy.J. A. M. A., 118:1–5, Jan. 3, 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schindler, R.: Gastroscopy — the Endoscopie Study of Gastric Pathology. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Palmer, W. L.: Benign and Malignant Gastric Ulcers: Their Relation and Clinical Differentiation.Ann. Int. Med., 13:317–339, Aug., 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Allen, A. W. and Welch, C. E.: Gastric Ulcer-The Significance of This Diagnosis and Its Relationship to Cancer.Ann. Surg., 114:498–506, Oct., 1941. b. Holman, C. W. and Sandusky, W. R.: Further Observations on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastric Lesions.Ann. Surg., 112:339-343, Sept., 1940.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Walters, W. and Clagett, O. T.: The Surgical Treatment of Chronic Gastric Ulcer.S. G. O., 71:75–79, July, 1940. b. Walters, W.: Gastric Ulcer, Benign or Malignant.Arch. Surg., 44:520-530, March, 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Steigmann, F.: The Treatment of Large Gastric Ulcers. Acccepted for publication by Archives of Surgery, 45:764–775, Nov., 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bloomfield, A.: The Diagnosis of Early Cancerous Changes in Peptic Ulcer.J. A. M. A., 104:1197–1201, April 6, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Palmer, W. L., Schindler, R. and Templeton, F. C.: The Development and Healing of Gastric Ulcer-A Clinical Gastroscopic and Roentgenologic Study.Am. J. Dig. Dis., 5:501–522, Oct., 1938.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steigmann, F. Considerations on the diagnosis of large gastric ulcers and implications as to treatment. Jour. D. D. 10, 88–93 (1943). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02996942

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02996942

Keywords

Navigation