Skip to main content
Log in

Resistance among accessions of the generalycopersicon andsolanum to four of the main insect pests of tomato in Israel

  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laboratory, greenhouse and field experiments were conducted to identify plant accessions of the genusLycopersicon and ofSolarium pennellii resistant toSpodoptera littoralis (Boisd.),Plusia chalcites (Esp.),Heliothis armigera (Hbn.), andPhthorimaea operculella (Zeu.), four insect pests of the cultivated tomato. Percent survival, larval weight, duration of development, damage scores, etc., were the criteria used to determine the relative resistance of the examined accessions. TheL. hirsutum accession LA 1777 and theL. hirsutum f.glabratum accession LA 407 were found to be highly resistant to all four insect pests. TheS. pennellii accession LA 716 was found to be resistant to the first three insects, but only partially resistant toP. operculella. The possible mechanisms of resistance,i.e., the physical entrapment of larvae and the toxic action of phytochemicals in the various accessions, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avidov, Z. and Harpaz, I. (1969) Plant Pests of Israel. Israel Universities Press, Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clayberg, C.D. and Kring, J.B. (1974) Breeding tomatoes resistant to potato aphid and white fly.HortScience 9: 297 (abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gentile, A.G. and Stoner, A.K. (1968) Resistance inLycopersicon andSolatium species to the potato aphid.J. econ. Ent. 61: 1152–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gentile, A.G. and Stoner, A.K. (1968) Resistance inLycopersicon spp. to the tobacco flea beetle.J. econ. Ent. 61: 1347–1349.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Juvik, J.A. (1980) Assessment of the alkaloid, α-tomatine as a potential source of natural insect resistance in tomato cultivars. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Davis, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rivnay, E. (1962) Field Crop Pests in the Near East.in: Weisbach, W.W. [Ed.] Mono-graphiae Biologicae. Vol. 10. Dr. W. Junk, Den Haag.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schalk, J.M. and Stoner, A.K. (1976) A bioassay differentiates resistance to the Colorado potato beetle on tomatoes.J. Am. Soc. hort. Sci. 101: 74–76.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schuster, D.J. (1977) Resistance in tomato accessions to the tomato pinworm.J. econ. Ent. 70: 434–436.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Webb, R.E., Stoner, A.K. and Gentile, A.G. (1971) Resistance to leaf miners inLycopersicon accessions.J. Am. Soc. hort. Sci. 96: 65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Williams, W.G., Kennedy, G.G., Yamamoto, R.T., Thacker, J.D. and Bordner, J. (1980) 2-tridecanon: A naturally occurring insecticide from the wild tomatoLycopersicon hirsutum f.glabratum.Science 207: 888–889.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Juvik, J.A., Berlinger, M.J., Ben-David, T. et al. Resistance among accessions of the generalycopersicon andsolanum to four of the main insect pests of tomato in Israel. Phytoparasitica 10, 145–156 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02994524

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02994524

Key Words

Navigation