Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Septoplasty—Few modifications

  • Original/Main Articles
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

March of septoplasty towards perfection is not yet complete. Problems of post-operative dryness due to mucociliary damage still remains, if all other things go fine. In this study much stress has been laid on least interference with septal mucosa, thereby respecting the mucociliary function. Role of Rosen’s Endomeatal knife in septoplasty has been evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bull T.R. (1983) : Septoplasty V/s S.M.R., proceedings of the 6th British Academic Conference in Otolaryngology Bristol 24–29 July 1983.Journal of Laryngology and Otology supplement No. 8 p. 108–112.

  2. Nicklasson B. (1982): Rhinometry & Septoplasty,Journal of Laryngology & Otology,96 : 991–995.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sood V.P. (1976): Septoplasty :Indian Journal of Otolaryngol.,28 : 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. E.N.T. Department, Government Medical College, Srinagar

    Rafiq Ahmed Pampori (Senior Registrar)

Authors
  1. Rafiq Ahmed Pampori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pampori, R.A. Septoplasty—Few modifications. Indian J Otolaryngol 40, 143–144 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02992603

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02992603

Keywords

Search

Navigation