Skip to main content
Log in

Proposal of a testing strategy and assessment criteria for the ecotoxicological assessment of soil or soil materials

  • Discussion Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Scope

Information on a potential contamination of soils or soil materials are derived by chemical analysis which takes place specifically for a given substance. For a comprehensive assessment, information on the bioavailable and mobile contaminant fraction, including all metabolites, is desirable. During the last years several research projects were initiated in Germany, to supplement the chemical analyses and to elaborate a suitable testing strategy. The main goal of this contribution is to elucidate the results of these research projects and to summarize the test strategy, which is recommended based on these results.

Results and Conclusion

Ecotoxicological tests, which are standardized for the assessment of chemicals, were regarded as a suitable starting basis for a cost effective, pragmatic approach. Aquatic tests (testing of aqueous soil extracts) focus on the retention function of soils and terrestrial tests (testing of soil) on the habitat function. Suitable reference systems for the terrestrial tests and assessment criteria for both test types (terrestrial and aquatic) were elaborated. On the basis of a round robin test and a laboratory comparison test, a minimal test battery was established. This minimal test battery can be supplemented by further tests if more or specific information is required.

Outlook

The recommendations should encourage the discussion regarding the application of biological methods for the assessment of soil quality. Such an assessment is or at least can be required by soil protection laws which have been adopted in some European countries within the last years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (2002): Optimisation of ecotoxicological test methods for routine use (BMBF-research project ‘ERNTE’). Journal of Soils and Sediments 2,165

  • BBodSchG (Bundes-Bodenschutzgesetz) (1998): Gesetz zum Schutz vor schädlichen Bodenveränderungen und zur Sanierung von Altlasten. Bundesgesetzblatt 502 vom 17.03.1998

  • BBodSch V (Bundes-Bodenschutzverordnung) (1999): Bundes-Bodenschutzund Altlastenverordnung. Verordnung zur Durchfuhrung des Bundes-Bodenschutzgesetzes. BGB1 I, 36, S. 1554–1582 vom 16.06.1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussian B, Kördel W, Kuhnt G, Ohnesorge S, Weinfurtner K (in preparation): Das RefeSol-Projekt — Grundlagen eines deutschen Referenzbodensystems

  • DECHEMA (2001): Methods for toxicological/ecotoxicological Assessment of Soil. 7th Report of the interdisciplinary DECHEMA committee ‘Environmental Biotechnology-Soil’. DECHEMA Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Chemisches Apparatewesen, Chemische Technik und Biotechnologie e.V. Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • DIN 38415 T4 (1998): Deutsche Einheitsverfahren zur Wasser-, Abwasser- und Schlammuntersuchung — Suborganismische Testverfahren (Gruppe T) — Teil 4: Bestimmung des erbgutveraendernden Potentials mit dem Salmonella-Mikro- somen-Test (Ames-Test) (T 4). VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbh. Weinheim, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlichmann H, Dott W, Eisentraeger A (2000): Assessment of the waterextractable genotoxic potential of soil samples from contaminated sites. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 46, 73–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eisentraeger A, Dott W, Klein J, Hahn S (2003): Comparative studies on algal toxicity testing using fluorometric microplate and Erlenmeyer flask growth inhibition assays. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 54, 346–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eisentraeger A, Dott W, Fleischmann S, Hund-Rinke K, Koerdel W, Wilke B-M (2000c): New combined strategies for the assessment of the ecotoxicological and genotoxikological potential of contaminated soils — results from several joint research projects. ConSoil 2000, 7th International FZK/TNO Conference on Contaminated Soil, 18-22.9.00, Leipzig. Contaminated Soil 2000. Proceedings of the seventh international FZK/TNO conference on contaminated soil 18.-22. September 2000, Leipzig, Germanv, Thomas Telford Publishing, London, ISBN 0 7277 2954 3, 609–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisentraeger A, Pfeifer F, Dott W (2000a): Erfassung des waeßrig extrahierbaren genotoxischen Potentials kontaminierter Boeden. In: Heiden S, Erb R Dott W, Eisentraeger A (Hrsg): Toxikologische Beurteilung von Boeden — Leistungsfaehigkeit biologischer Testverfahren. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin, ISBN 3-8274-1095-9, 131–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisentraeger A, Rila J-P, Ehrlichmann H, Dott W (2001): Erfassung des waeßrig extrahierbaren genotoxischen Potentials von Boeden und Bodenmaterialien mit optimierten bakteriellen Genotoxizitaetstests. In: Neumann- Hensel H, Ahlf W, Wachendoerfer V (Hrsg): Nachweis von Umweltchemikalien — Auswerte- und Interpretationsmethoden fuer Toxizitaetsdaten aus einer oekotoxikologischen Testkombination. (Initiativen zum Umweltschutz Band 29). Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin, ISBN 3 503 06019 7, 47–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisentraeger A, Rila J-P, Guettes R, Dott W (2000b): Untersuchungen und Empfehlungen zur Lagerung von Bodenproben fuer toxikologische Untersuchungen. In: Heiden S, Erb R, Dott W, Eisentraeger A (Hrsg): Toxikologische Beurteilung von Boeden — Leistungsfaehigkeit biologischer Testverfahren. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin, ISBN 3-8274-1095-9, 181–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiden S, Erb R, Dott W, Eisentraeger A (eds) (2000): Toxikologische Beurteilung von Boeden. Leistungsfaehigkeit biologischer Testverfahren. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hund-Rinke K, Koerdel W, Heiden S, Erb R (eds) (2002c): Oekotoxikologische Testbatterien — Ergebnisse eines DBU-gefoerderten Ringtests. Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin, ISBN 3 503 06683 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Hund-Rinke K, Koerdel W, Hennecke D, Achazi R., Warnecke D, Wilke B-M, Winkel B, Heiden S (2002b): Bioassays for the Ecotoxicological and Genotoxicological Assessment of Contaminated Soils (Results of a Round Robin Test). Part II. Assessment of the Habitat Function of Soils. Journal of Soils and Sediments 2 (2) 83–90 <DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10 1065/jss2002.06.043>

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hund-Rinke K, Koerdel W, Hennecke D, Eisentraeger A, Heiden S (2002a): Bioassays for the Ecotoxicological and Genotoxicological Assessment of Contaminated Soils (Results of a Round Robin Test) - Part I: Assessment of a Possible Groundwater Contamination: Ecotoxicological and Genotoxicological Tests with Aquatic Soil Extracts. Journal of Soils and Sediments 2(1) 43–50 <DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.1065/jss2002.03.36>

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hund-Rinke K, Koerdel W (2003): Underlying issues in bioaccessibility and bioavailability: experimental methods. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 56, 52–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 8692 (1989): Water quality — Fresh water algal growth inhibition test withScenedesmus subspicatus andSelenastrum capricornutum. International Organization for Standardization, Genf, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 11267 (1999): Soil quality — Inhibition of reproduction of collembola (Folsomia Candida) by soil pollutants. International Organization for Standardization, Genf, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 11268-1 (1993): Soil quality — Effects of pollutants on earthworms (Eisenia fetida) -Part 1: Determination of acute toxicity using artificial soil substrate. International Organization for Standardization, Genf, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 11268-2 (1998) Soil quality — Effects of pollutants on earthworms (Eisenia fetida) - Part 2: determination of effects on reproduction. International Organization for Standardization, Genf, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 11269-2 (1995): Soil quality — Determination of the effects of pollutants on soil flora - Part 2: effects of chemicals on the emergence and growth of higher plants. International Organization for Standardization, Genf, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 11348 Part 1-3 (1998): Water quality — Determination of the inhibitory effect of water samples on the light emission ofVibrio fischeri (Luminescent bacteria test). International Organization for Standardisation, Genf, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 13829 (2000): Water quality — Determination of the genotoxicity of water and waste water using the umu-test. International Organization for Standardization, Genf, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/DIS 15685 (2001): Soil quality — Determination of potential nitrification — Rapid test by ammonium oxidation. International Organization for Standardization, Genf, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 15799 (2003): Soil quality — Guidance on the Ecotoxicological characterization of soils and soil materials. International Organization for Standardization, Genf, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 17155 (2002): Soil quality — determination of the activity of the soil microflora using respiration curves. International Organization for Standardization, Genf, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/CD 21268-1 (2003): Soil quality — Leaching procedures for subsequent chemical and ecotoxicological testing of soil and soil materials — Part 1: Batch test using a liquid to solid ratio of 2 L/kg dry matter. International Organization for Standardization, Genf, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Koerdel W, Mueller-Wegener U, Roembke J, Von der Trenck T (2000): Anforderungen an physikalisch-chemische und biologische Testmethoden zur Einschätzung von Boeden und Bodensubstraten. GDCh Monographie Band 20, 284 pp

  • Kuhnt G, Muntau H (1992): EURO-Soils: Identification, Collection, Treatment, Characterization. Joint Research Center, European Commission, Ispra

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxam G, Rila J-P, Dott W, Eisentraeger A (2000): Use of bioassays for assessment of water-extractable ecotoxic potential of soils. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 45, 240–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michels J, Track T, Gehrke U, Sell D (eds.) 2002: Leitfaden — Biologische Verfahren zur Bodensanierung. Umweltbundesamt, Fachgebiet III 3.6, PO Box 330022, 14191 Berlin, Germany

  • Pfeifer F, Haake F, Koerdel W, Eisentraeger A (2000): Untersuchung der Rueckhaltefunktion von Boeden mit aquatischen Testsystemen. In: Heiden S, Erb R, Dott W, Eisentraeger A (Hrsg.): Toxikologische Beurteilung von Boeden — Leistungsfaehigkeit biologischer Testverfahren. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin, ISBN 3-8274-1095-9, 1-18

    Google Scholar 

  • Rila J-P, Dott W, Eisentraeger A (2003a): Long-time respiration of contaminated soil samples during laboratory storage under different conditions. Soil and Sediment Contamination 12, 481–496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rila J-P, Eisentraeger A (2003): Application of bioassays for risk characterisation and remediation control of soils polluted with nitroaromatics and PAHs. Water, Air & Soil Pollution 148, 223–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rila J-P, Hund-Rinke K, Pfeifer F, Dott W, Eisentraeger A (2003b): Validation of microplate bioassays for the assessment of contaminated and remediated sites (laboratory-intercomparison study). Journal of Soils and Sediments 3 (4) 273–283 <DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1065/jss2003.02.068>

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roembke J, Labes G, Woiwode J (2002): Ansaetze fuer biologische Bewertungsstrategien und Bewertungskonzepte im Bodenschutz. Bodenschutz 2/02, 62–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Roembke J, Notenboom J(2002): Ecotoxicological Approaches in the Field. In: Environmental Analysis of Contaminated Sites. Sunahara G, Renoux AY, Thellen C, Gaudet CL, Pilon A (eds) J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 181–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurgeon, D, Svendsen C, Hankard P, Weeks J, Kille P, Fishwick S (2002): Review of sublethal ecotoxicological tests for measuring harm in terrestrial ecosystems. Environment Agency, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilke B-M, Pieper S, Roembke J (2003): Beurteilung des Wirkungspfads Boden — Bodenorganismen. In: Praxiserfahrungen zur Anwendung des Bodenschutzrechts II, Vollzugserfahrungen und Regelungen. Koenig W. (ed). E. Schmidt Verlag, Berlin. 83–94

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adolf Eisentraeger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eisentraeger, A., Rila, jP., Hund-Rinke, K. et al. Proposal of a testing strategy and assessment criteria for the ecotoxicological assessment of soil or soil materials. J Soils & Sediments 4, 123–128 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02991056

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02991056

Keywords

Navigation