Skip to main content
Log in

Spectral characteristics of sensors onboard IRS-1D and P6 satellites: Estimation and their influence on surface reflectance and NDVI

  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a modeling study carried out with two objectives, (1) to estimate and compare effective spectral characteristics (central wavelength, bandwidth and bandpass exo-atmospheric solar irradiance Eo) of various spectral channels of LISS-III, WiFS, LISS-III*, LISS-IV and AWiFS onboard Indian Remote Sensing Satellites IRS-ID and P6 using moment method based on the laboratory measurements of sensor spectral response, and (2) to quantify the influence of varying sensor spectral response on reflectance and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) measurements using surface reflectance spectra corresponding to different leaf area index conditions of crop target obtained through field experiment. Significant deviation of 4 to 14 nm in central wavelength and 1.6 to 14.07 nm in spectral width was observed for the corresponding channel of IRS sensors. Coefficient of variation of the order of 0.1 to 1.11% was noticed in Eo among various IRS sensors, which could induce a difference of 0.72 to 3.35% in the estimation of top of atmosphere reflectance for crop target. The variation in spectral response of IRS sensors implied a relative difference of the order of 0.91 to 3.38% in surface reflectance and NDVI measurements. Polynomial approximations are also provided for spectral correction that can be utilized for normalizing the artifacts introduced due to differences in spectral characteristics among IRS sensors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burgess, D.W. and Pairman, D. (1997). Bidirectional reflectance effects in NOAA-AVHRR data.International Journal of Remote Sensing,18: 2815–2825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadhwal, V.K., Singh, R.P., Dutta. S. and Parihar. J.S. (2002). Remote sensing based crop inventory: a review of Indian experience.Tropical Ecology,43: 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggin, M.J. (1980). Effect of instrument spectral response on use of the Landsat MSS for vegetative disease assessment.Applied optics,19: 2081–2083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epiphanio, J.C.N. and Huete, A.R. (1995). Dependence of NDVI and SAVI on sun sensor geometry and its effect on fAPAR relationships in alfalfa.Remote Sensing of Environment,51: 351–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galvào, L.S., Vitorello, I. and Pizarro, M.A. (2000). An adequate band positioning to enhance NDVI contrasts among green vegetation, senescent biomass and tropical soils.International Journal of Remote Sensing,21: 1953–1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galvão, LS., Vitorello, I. and Filho R.A. (1999). Effects of band positioning and bandwidth on NDVI measurements of tropical savannas.Remote Sensing of Environment 67: 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X., Huete, A.R., Ni, W. and Miura, T. (2000). Optical- biophysical relationships of vegetation spectra without background contamination.Remote Sensing of Environment,74: 609–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, S., Peterson, J., Esplin, R. and Tansock, J. (2003). Component level prediction versus system level measurement of SABER relative spectral response.International Journal of Remote Sensing,24: 389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, R.D. and Hudson, J.W. (1975). Infrared detectors. Halsted Press. pp. 392.

  • Huete, A., Justice, C. and Liu, H. (1994). Development of vegetation and soil indices for MODIS-EOS.Remote Sensing of Environment,49: 224–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huete, A.R. (1988). A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI).Remote Sensing of Environment,25: 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huete, A.R. and Liu, H. (1994). An error and sensitivity analysis of the atmospheric- and soil-correcting variants of the NDVI for MODIS-EOS.IEEE Trans. Geoscience & Remote Sensing,32: 897–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, Y. J. (1989). The atmospheric effect on remote sensing and its correction. Theory and Applications of Optical Remote Sensing, G. Asrar Ed. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, S. (2004).Quantitative remote sensing of land surface, Wiley Interscience, pp. 14–18.

  • Navalgund R.R. (2006). Indian Earth observation systems: An overview.Asian Jl. Geoinformatics,6: 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neckel, H. and Labs, D. (1984). The solar radiation between 3300 and 12500 A, °,Solar Physics,90:205–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J.M. (1984). Effective bandwidths for Landsat- 4 and Landsat-d’ multispectral scanner and thematic mapper subsystems.IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,22: 336–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandya, M.R., Singh, R.P., Chaudhari, K.N., Oza, SR., Bairagi G.D., Dadhwal, V.K. and Parihar J.S. (2004). Spectral and radiometric evaluation of sensors onboard IRS-P6. Scientific Report: SAC/RESIPA/ SR-02/Oct 2004. page: 3–12.

  • Pandya, M.R., Singh, R.P., Murali, K.R., Babu, P.N., Kirankumar, A.S. and Dadhwal, V.K. (2002). Band pass solar exoatmospheric irradiance and Rayleigh optical thickness of sensor onboard IRS-1B, 1C, 1D and P4.IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,40: 714–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandya, MR., Dadhwal, V.K. and Navalgund, R.R. (2000). Effect of WiFS viewing geometry on crop reflectance: a simulation study using SAIL model.International Journal of Remote Sensing,21: 1931–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, J.C. (1987). Calibration of satellite radiometers and the comparison of vegetation indices.Remote Sensing of Environment,21: 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, R. (2000). Bandpass-resampling effects on the retrieval of radiance and surface reflectance.Applied Optics. 39:5001–5005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shine, K.P. and A. Henderson-Sellers (1985) The influence of satellite spectral response on the analysis of satellite imagery at high latitudes.International Journal of Remote Sensing,6: 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, P.N. (1979). A re-examination of the Landsat MSS.Photogram. Eng. & Remote Sensing,45: 1479–1485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teillet, P.M., Barker, J.L., Markham, B.L., Irish, R.R., Fedosejevs, G. and Storey, J.C. (2001). Radiometric cross-calibration of the Landsat-7 ETM+ and Landsat-5 TM sensors based on tandem data sets.Remote Sensing of Environment,78: 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teillet, P.M., Staenz K. and Williams, D.J. (1997). Effects of spectral, spatial and radiometric characteristics on remote sensing vegetation indices of forested regions.Remote Sensing of Environment.61: 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trishchenko, A.P., Cihlar, J. and Li, Z. (2002). Effects of spectral response function on surface reflectance and NDVI measured with moderate resolution satellite sensors.Remote Sensing of Environment,81:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Franz, B.A., Barnes, R.A. and McClain, C.R. (2001). Effects of spectral bandpass on SeaWiFS- retrieved near-surface optical properties of the ocean.Applied Optics,40: 343–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. R. Pandya.

About this article

Cite this article

Pandya, M.R., Singh, R.P., Chaudhari, K.N. et al. Spectral characteristics of sensors onboard IRS-1D and P6 satellites: Estimation and their influence on surface reflectance and NDVI. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 35, 333–350 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990789

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990789

Keywords

Navigation