Abstract
A new nondimensional method for predicting the windmilling performance of centrifugal flow turbojet engines in flight has been developed. The method incorporates loss correlations to estimate the performance of major engine components. Given basic engine geometry, flight Mach number, and ambient conditions, this method predicts transient and steady-state windmilling performance. Thus, this method can be used during the preliminary design stage when detailed hardware geometry and component performance data are not yet available. A nondimensional time parameter is newly defined, and using this parameter, the transient performance of different types of turbojets (e.g. centrifugal vs. axial) is compared. In addition, the predictions’ sensitivity to loss correlations, slip factors, and inlet ambient temperatures are analyzed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A :
-
Area
- a :
-
Acoustic velocity
- b :
-
Blade height
- C:
-
Absolute velocity
- C f :
-
Friction factor
- DF :
-
Diffusion factor
- d :
-
Diameter
- g c :
-
Constant in the force equation
- h :
-
Enthalpy
- I:
-
Moment of inertia
- i :
-
Incidence angle
- K f :
-
Torque coefficient
- L :
-
Length
- M :
-
Mach number
- M u :
-
Tangential Mach number at tip
- m :
-
Mass flow rate
- N :
-
Rotational speed
- P :
-
Total pressure
- ΔP b :
-
Total pressure loss at combustor
- Q :
-
Torque
- R :
-
Gas constant
- γ :
-
Radius
- Re :
-
Reynolds number
- S:
-
Entropy
- T :
-
Temperature
- t :
-
Time
- U :
-
Blade rotational speed
- W :
-
Relative velocity
- Z :
-
Blade number
- Δ:
-
Finite change
- a :
-
Absolute flow angle
- β :
-
Relative flow angle
- δ :
-
Nondimensional excess torque
- ε :
-
Blade tip clearance
- γ :
-
Specific heat ratio
- η :
-
Efficiency
- K :
-
Kinetic energy loss coefficient
- μ :
-
Slip factor
- α :
-
Kinematic viscosity
- θ :
-
Nondimensional mass flow rate
- ρ :
-
Density
- τ :
-
Nondimensional time
- ξ :
-
Loss coefficient
- ψ :
-
Blade loading coefficient
- a :
-
Ambient condition
- b :
-
Blade angle
- bl :
-
Blade loading
- cl :
-
Clearance
- cΰ :
-
Critical
- des :
-
Design condition
- df :
-
Disk friction
- HB :
-
Hydraulic mean
- h :
-
Hub
- i :
-
Inlet duct
- in :
-
Stage inlet
- inc :
-
Incidence
- L :
-
Normal component to the optimum flow direction
- LJ :
-
Normal component to the meridional flow direction
- m :
-
Meridional, mechanical
- mix :
-
Mixed conditional
- n :
-
Step
- noz :
-
Exhaust nozzle
- opt :
-
Optimum
- out :
-
Stage exit
- γ :
-
Rotor
- γc :
-
Recirculation
- s:
-
Stator
- sf :
-
Skin friction
- std :
-
Standard consition
- t :
-
Tip
- vd :
-
Vaned diffuser
- vld :
-
Vaneless diffuser
- W :
-
Circumferential direction
- 0:
-
Stagnation state, upstream of compressor
- 1:
-
Impeller inlet
- 2:
-
Impeller exit
- 2D :
-
Vaneless diffuser inlet
- 2vl :
-
Vaneless diffuser exit
- 3:
-
Turbine rotor inlet
- 4:
-
Turbine rotor exit
- ′:
-
Relative condition
References
Aungier, R. H., 1990, “Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of Vaned Diffusers,”Fluid Machinery Components, ASME FED, Vol. 101, pp. 27–44.
Aungier, R. H., 1995, “Mean Streamline Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of Centrifugal Compressors,”ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 117, pp. 360–366.
Choi, M. S., Lim, J. S. and Hong, Y. S., 1996, “A Practical Method for Predicting the Windmilling Characteristics of Simple Turbo Jet Engines,”ASME TURBO ASIA ’96, Indonesia, Paper No. 96-TA-60.
Conrad, O., Raif, K. and Wessels, M., 1980, “The Calculation of Performance Maps for Centrifugal Compressors with Vane-Island Diffusers,”ASME 25th Annual International Gas Turbine Conference and 22th Annual Fluids Engineering Conference, Louisiana, pp. 135–147.
Coppage, J. E., Dallenbach, F., Eichenberger, J. P., Hlavak, G. E., Kmoernschild, E. M. and Vanke, N., 1956, “Study of Supersonic Radial Compressors for Refrigeration and Pressurization Systems,” WADC Report 55–257.
Daily, J. W. and Nece, R. E., 1960, “Chamber Dimension Effects on Induced Flow and Frictional Resistance of Enclosed Rotating Disks,”ASME Journal of Basic Engineering, Vol. 82, pp. 217–232.
Galvas, M. R., 1973, “FORTRAN Program for Predicting Off-Design Performance of Centrifugal Compressors,” NASA TN D-7487.
Jansen, W., 1967, “A Method for Calculating the Flow in a Centrifugal Impeller When Entropy Gradients Are Present,”Royal Society Conference on Internal Aerodynamics (Turbomachinery), pp. 133–146.
Kang, I. S., Choi, M. S., Lim, J. S. and Hong, Y. Y., 1997, “Analysis of Windmilling Charateristics for Twin-Spool Turbofan Engine,”ASME ASIA '97, Singapore, Paper No. 97-AA-113.
Krylov, P. and Spunde, A., 1991, “About the Influence of the Clearance Between the Working Blades and Housing of a Radial Turbine on Its Exponent,”Izvestiya VUZ. Energetika, No. 7.
Rodgers, C, 1978, “A Diffusion Factor Correlation for Centrifugal Impeller Stalling,” ASME Paper 78-GT-61.
Whitfield, A. and Baines, N. C, 1990,Design of Radial Turbomachinery, Longman Scientific and Technical.
Whitfield, A. and Wallace, F. J., 1975, “Performance Prediction for Automotive Turbocharger Compressors,”Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs., Part A, Vol. 189, pp. 557–565.
Wiesner, F. J., 1967, “A Review of Slip Factors for Centrifugal Impellers,”AS ME Journal of Engineering for Power, Vol. 89, pp. 558–572.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Su, Y.I., Jin, S.S. & Shik, L.J. Windmilling characteristics of centrifugal-flow turbojets. KSME International Journal 18, 2021–2031 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990444
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990444