Skip to main content
Log in

Ammonia Brünnich (Foram.) und verwandte Arten aus dem Indischen Ozean (Malabar-Küste, SW-Indien)

  • Published:
Paläontologische Zeitschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

An Hand von Material aus der Lagune von Cochin (Malabar-Küste, SW-Indien) und vom vorgelagerten Schelf wurde der Schalenbau einiger Foraminiferen («ArtengruppeAmmonia beccarii (L.)») untersucht, die bisher meist zuAmmonia, Streblus oderRotalia gestellt worden sind. Durch Schliffe und Stereoscan-Aufnahmen ergab sich, daß nur eine Art (Rotalia beccarii var.sobrina Shupack 1934) zum GenusAmmonia Brünnich zu stellen ist. Die anderen beiden Arten sind dagegen alsDiscorbis tepida (Cushman 1926) undPseudoeponides pauciloculata (Phleger & Parker 1951) zu bezeichnen. Die ökologischen Verhältnisse dieser Formen werden kurz erörtert.

Summary

Three species of Foraminifera, which were usually regarded as members of theAmmonia beccarii (L.)-group or closely related, are investigated. The material comes mainly from the lagoon of Cochin and from the shelf off Cochin (SW-India, Malabarcoast). Sections and Stereoscan-microphotographs revealed considerable differences in the internal structure (double or simple septae, different shape of the tooth-plates, areal or interiomarginal situation of the septal apertures). This leads to the conclusion, that only one species (Rotalia beccarii var.sobrina Shupack 1934) is a trueAmmonia. Rotalia beccarii var.tepida Cushman 1926 should be put to the genusDiscorbis, Rotalia pauciloculata Phleger & Parker 1951 is regarded as a species ofPseudoeponides. Some ecological observations are added.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Ayala-Castanares, A. (1963): Sistematica y Distribucion de los Foraminiferos recientes de la Laguna de Terminos, Campeche, Mexico.—Univ. Nac. auton. Mexico, Inst. Geol., Bol.67, 3, 1–130, 11 Taf., Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermudez, P. J. &Seiglie, G. A. (1963): Estudio sistematico de los Foraminiferos del Golfo de Cariaco.—Bol. Inst. oceanograf. Univ. de Oriente,2, 2, 3–194, 29 Taf., 9 Abb., Venezuela.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J. S. (1957): Laboratory studies on the rate of growth of the Foraminifer «Streblus beccarii (Linné) var.tepida (Cushman)».—J. Paleontol.,31, 1138 bis 1147 5 Abb., Tulsa.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1961): Laboratory experiments on the ecology of Foraminifera.—Contr. Cushmann Found. Foramin. Res.,12, 3, 87–106, 9 Abb., 10 Tab., Bridgewater.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cifelli, R. (1962): The morphology and structure ofAmmonia beccarii (Linné).—Contr. Cushman Found. Foramin. Res.,13, 4, 119–126, 2 Taf., 7 Abb., Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cifelli, R. &Towe, K. M. (1967): Wall ultrastructure in the calcareous Foraminifera: Crystallographic aspects and a model for calcification.—J. Paleont.,41, 3, 742–762, 12 Taf., Tulsa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, J. A. (1926): Recent Foraminifera from Porto Rico.—Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ.344, (Dept. Marine Biol., Papers,23), 73–84, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1928): OnRotalia beccarii (L.)—Contr. Cushman Lab. Foramin. Res.,4, 4, 103–107, 1 Taf., Sharon.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1931): The Foraminifera of the Atlantic Ocean. Pt. 8.—Smithson. Inst. U. S. Nat. Mus. Bull.104, 1–179, 26 Taf., Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, R. L. &Maynard, M. N. (1970): Estuarine Foraminifera from the Rappahannock River, Virginia.—Contr. Cushman Found. Foramin. Res.,21, 1, 1–17, 2 Taf., 9 Abb., Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofker, J. (1930): Der Generationswechsel vonRotalia beccarii var.flevensis nov. var. —Z. Zellforsch. mikr. Anat.,10, 756–768, Berlin.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofker, J. (1951): The Foraminifera of the Siboga Expedition; Part. III.—Monogr. Leiden.

  • Hofker, J. (1954): Foraminifera.—In: Veranderingen in de Flora en Fauna der Zuidersee (Thans Ijsselmeer) na de Afsluiting in 1932.—74–89.

  • — (1960): Foraminiferen aus dem Golf von Neapel.—Paläont. Z.,34, 233–262, 184 Abb., Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1964): Foraminifera from the Tidal Zone in the Netherlands Antilles and other West Indian Islands.—Stud. on the Fauna of Curacao and other Carib. Islands,XXI, 83, 1–119, Fig. 1–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1968): Foraminifera from the Bay of Jakarta, Java.—Bijdragen tot de Dierkde.,37, 1–59, 9 Taf., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1968): Studies of Foraminifera. Pt. 1.—Publicat. Natuurhist. Genootsch. Limburg,18, 1 u. 2, 5–135, 15 Abb., 24 taf., Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeblich, A. R. & Tappan, H. (1964): Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part. C, Protista 2,2, Lawrence, Kansas.

  • Longinelli, A. &Tongiorgi, E. (1960): Frequenza degli individui destrogiri in diverse popolazioni di Rotalia beccarii Linneo.—Boll. Soc. Paleontol. Italiana,1, 1, 5–16, 3 Fig., Modena.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Orbigny, A. (1839): Foraminifères.—In:R. de la Sagra, Histoire physique, politique et naturelle de l’Ile de Cuba, Paris.

  • Phleger, F. B. (1951): Ecology of Foraminifera, northwest, Gulf of Mexico, Pt. 1.—Geol. Soc. Amer., Mem.,46, 1–88, 19 Taf., 29 Tab., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1956): Significance of Living Foraminiferal populations along the Central Texas Coast.—Contr. Cushman Found. Foramin. Res.,7, 4, 106–151, 20 Textfig., 11 Tab., Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phleger, F. B. &Parker, F. L. (1951): Ecology of Foraminifera, northwest Gulf of Mexico, Pt. 2, Foraminifera species.—Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem.,46, 2, 1–64, 20 Taf., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, Z., (1963): Reclassification of perforate Foraminifera.—State of Israel, Geol. Surv. Bull.,35, 5–111, 8 Taf., 1 Tab., Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, Z. &Merling, P. (1958): Structure of some Rotaliidea.—State of Israel, Geol. Surv. Bull.,21, 1–19, 5 Taf., Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resig, J., (1969): Paleontological Investigations of Deep Borings on the Ewa Plain, Oahu, Hawaii.—Hawaii Inst. Geophys.,69, 2, 1–95, 9 Taf., 9 Tab., 8 Abb., Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, A. T. &Ubaldo, M. L. (1964): Nota sobre los foraminiferos recentes das areias das praias de Jampor (Damao) e de Baga (Goa).—Garcia de Orta,12, 4, 645–650, 2 Taf. Lissabon.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1964): Contribution for the study of Foraminifera from sands of Diu, Gogola and Simbor.—Garcia de Orta,12, 3, 407–420, 5 Taf., Lissabon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shupack, B. (1934): Some Foraminifera from western Long Island and New York Harbour. —Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nov.,737, New York.

  • Todd, R. (1965): The Foraminifera of the tropical Pacific collections of the «Albatross», 1899–1900; Pt. 4: Rotaliform Families and Planctonic Families.—U.S. Nat. Mus. Bull.,161, 1–137, 28 Taf., 5 Abb., Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, R. &Brönnimann, P. (1957): Recent Foraminifera and Thecamoebina from the Eastern Gulf of Paria.—Cushman Found. Foramin. Res., Spec. Publ.3, 1–43, 12 Taf., 7 Abb., 5 Tab., Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorthuysen, J. H. van, (1957): Foraminiferen aus dem Eemien (Riss-Würm-Interglazial) in der Bohrung Amersfoort I (Locus typicus).—Mededel. Geol. Sticht., N. Ser.,11, 27–39, 4 Taf., 1 Abb., Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A., Haynes, J. &Adams, T. D. (1963): The structure ofAmmonia beccarii (Linné).—Contr. Cushman Found. Foramin. Res.,14, 4, 156–157, 1 Taf., Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mit Tafel 5–7 und 3 Textabbildungen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seibold, I. Ammonia Brünnich (Foram.) und verwandte Arten aus dem Indischen Ozean (Malabar-Küste, SW-Indien). Paläont. Z. 45, 41–52 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02989674

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02989674

Navigation