Conclusions
Irradiation affects the time scale of development by which we measure its effects in the breakage of chromosomes. This explains why single-time comparisons have hitherto shown discordant results. Our comparative breakage-time series enable us to measure both effects and to show direct proportionality of dose and breakage in the pollen grain.
Comparison of pollen grains and pollen tubes shows that their chromosomes have a similar breakability and also inherent rejoinability (as deduced from the frequencies of minutes). But actual rejoining, as between different chromosomes or chromosome arms, such as is revealed in the empirical coefficient of reunion, is frustrated by the close packing of the nucleus.
The pollen-tube nuclei show extreme overlapping of B′ and B″ owing to extreme divergence in rates of nuclear development. They also show a greater primary effect with greater stickiness than in the pollen and (perhaps correlated with this) SR of unbroken ends, which overlaps with the regular SR of broken ends. The general result agrees with that inferred from progeny tests after X-rayingDrosophila sperm while of course showing many other changes that would not appear in any progeny.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Catcheside, D. G. &Lea, D. E. (1943). The effect of ionization distribution on chromosome breakage by X-rays.J. Genet. 45, 186–96.
La Cour, L. F. &Fabergé, A. C. (1943). The use of cellophane in pollen-tube technique.Stain Tech. 18, 196.
Swanson, C. P. (1942). The effects of ultraviolet and X-ray treatment on the pollen-tube chromosomes ofTradescantia.Genetics,27, 491–503.
Additional information
(With Plate 6, Twenty-two Text-figures and Twenty Graphs)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Darlington, C.D., La Cour, L.F. Chromosome breakage and the nucleic acid cycle. Journ. of Genetics 46, 180–267 (1945). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02989269
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02989269