Skip to main content
Log in

A simple method for simultaneous estimation of zinc and copper in erythrocytes

Comparison of a new methodology with a standard technique

  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method is described for simultaneous estimation of zinc and copper in erythrocytes by hemolysis and flame aspiration atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Red blood cells (RBC) were also analyzed by the commonly used nitric acid digestion method for comparison. The difference in the results of zinc analyses of fifteen RBC samples by the two techniques was 0.5 ± 0.8 (mean ± SD) μg Zn/g hemoglobin indicating that these methods yield essentially similar results. Because of the low concentration of copper in RBC, results obtained by the acid digestion method were unreliable since nitric acid and undissolved particles of digested RBC in the acid extract increased instrumental noise to an unacceptable level. Average concentrations of zinc and copper estimated in RBC of 25 normal subjects by the present described technique (hemolysate method) were 43.9 and 2.0 μg/g Hb, respectively. No sex-related differences in RBC zinc or copper concentrations were found. The hemolysate method is simpler and faster to perform than the more commonly used nitric acid digestion method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Meret and R. I. Henkin,Clin. Chem. 17, 369 (1971).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. E. Dennes, R. Tupper, and A. Wormall,Biochem. J. 78, 578 (1961).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. K. Mahajan, A. S. Prasad, P. Rabbani, W. A. Briggs, and F. D. McDonald,J. Lab. Clin. Med. 94, 693 (1979).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. D. J. Kosman and R. I. Henkin,Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 34, 118 (1981).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. R. C. Whitehouse, A. S. Prasad, P. L Rabbani, and Z. T. Cossack,Clin. Chem. 28, 475 (1982).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. J. Eilers,Am. J. Clin, Pathol. 47, 212 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. L Davidson and J. B. Henry, inClinical Diagnosis by Laboratory Methods, I. Davidson and J. B. Henry, eds., Saunders, Philadelphia, 1974, p. 110.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. R. Talbot, Jr. and J. F. Ross,Lab. Invest. 9, 174 (1960).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. G. A. Rose and E. G. Willden,Brit. J. Urol. 44, 281 (1972).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Mansouri, J. A. Halsted, and E. A. Gombos,Arch. Intern. Med. 125, 88 (1970).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. S. Prasad, D. Oberleas, and J. A. Halsted,J. Lab. Clin. Med. 66, 508 (1965).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. H. D. Zaidan, Zinc Investigations in Sickle Cell Anemia. Doctoral Dissertation, Dept. of Food, Nutrition and Institution Administration, College of Human Ecology, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.

  13. R. I. Henkin, inZinc, University Park Press, College Park, MD, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agarwal, R.P., Henkin, R.I. A simple method for simultaneous estimation of zinc and copper in erythrocytes. Biol Trace Elem Res 7, 199–208 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02989246

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02989246

Keywords

Navigation