Skip to main content
Log in

New indicator approaches for effective urban air quality management

  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measurements of urban air quality at monitoring stations in developed countries have frequently involved the criteria gaseous pollutants, particulates, hazardous air pollutants, perceived air quality and relevant meteorological conditions. Large numbers of indicators have therefore been established to quantify emissions, concentrations and environmental and human health impacts of each of these groups of substances. To simplify the data for management, several indicators have been grouped together to form urban air quality indices but the weightings of individual variables is contentious.

In industrialising and developing countries, data may be limited and traditional air pollutant indicators cannot often be constructed. The emphasis therefore has to be placed on the development of policy-relevant indicators, such as Response Indicators that reflect different policy principles for regulating air pollutant emissions. Indices that quantify the air quality management capabilities and capacities at the city level provide further useful decision-relevant tools. Four sets of indices, namely, 1. air quality measurement capacity, 2. data assessment and availability, 3. emissions estimates, and 4. management enabling capabilities, and a composite index to evaluate air quality management capability, were constructed and applied to 80 cities. The indices revealed that management capability varied widely between the cities. In some of the cities, existing national knowledge on urban air quality could have been more effectively used for management.

It was concluded that for effective urban air quality management, a greater emphasis should be given, not just to monitoring and data capture programmes, but to the development of indicators and indices that empower decision-makers to initiate management response strategies. Over-reliance on restricted, predetermined sets of traditional air quality indicators should be avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • CEU (1996): Ambient air quality assessment and management. Council Directive 96/62/EC of 27’h September 1996. Official Journal L296, 55–63

    Google Scholar 

  • CEU (1998): Proposals for a Council Directive relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air. Document 9687/98, July 8, 1998, The Council of the European Union, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Corvalan, C.;Briggs, D.;Kjellstrom, T. (1996): Development of environmental health indicators. In:Briggs, D.;Corvalan, C.;Nurminen, M. (Eds.): Linkage methods for environment and health analysis: general guidelines. Report WHO/EHG/95.26, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 19–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish Ministry Of The Environment (1995): Environmental indicators 1995: what is the state of the environment like? Ministry of the Environment; Ministry of Energy, Copenhagen, Denmark (In Danish)

  • EEA (1997): Air pollution in Europe 1997. European Environment Agency Monograph no. 4, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (1998a): Europe’s environment: the second assessment. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen; Elsevier Science Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (1998b): Proposed transport/environment reporting mechanism for the EU. Report April 24, 1998, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Australia (1997): Key environmental indicators for the atmosphere, in state of the environment reporting. Proceedings of a Workshop, January 21–22,1997. Department of the Environment, Sport and Territories, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M.H. (1966): An air pollution index based on sulphur dioxide and smoke shade. J. Air Poll. Control Assoc. II, 703–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R.M. (1997): Urban air pollution in the United Kingdom. In,Davison, G.;Hewitt, C. N. (Eds.): Air pollution in the United Kingdom. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, pp. 22–39

    Google Scholar 

  • HMSO (1996): Indicators of sustainable development for the United Kingdom. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhaber, H. (1974): A set of suggested air quality indices for Canada. Atmos. Environ. 9, 353–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Manton, M.J.;Jasper, J.D. (1998): Environmental indicators for national state of the environment reporting: the atmosphere, Australia. Department of the Environment, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, A.J. (1997): Transport and health; assessing the risks. In:Fletcher, T.;McMichael, A. J. (Eds.): Health at the crossroads: transport policy and urban health. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp. 9–26

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1978): Urban environmental indicators. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1993): Control of hazardous air pollutants in OECD member countries. Report OECD/GD(93), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1994): Environmental indicators: OECD Core Set. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1995): Hazardous air pollutants: the London workshop. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, W.R. (1978): Environmental indices: theory and practice. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, W.R.;Hunt, W.F., Jr (1976): A quantitative evaluation of the pollutants standards index. J. Air Poll. Control Assoc. 26. 1050–1054

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P.J. (1997a): Indicators of sustainable development in industrializing countries, vol. I, management response strategies. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P.J. (1997b): Indicators of sustainable development in industrializing countries, vol. II, from concepts to action. LESTARI, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P.J.;Sham, S.;Nordin, M. (1998): Indicators of sustainable development in industrializing countries, vol. III, key indicators for tropical cities. LESTARI, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, G.C.;Gerbec, P.E.;Livingston, S.K.;Oliaei, F.;Bollweg, G.L.;Paterson, S.;Mackay, D. (1993): An indexing system for comparing toxic air pollutants based upon their potential environmental impacts. Chemosphere 27, 1359–1379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, D.A.U.; Williams, W.P. (1998) Assessment and Management of Urban Air Quality in Europe. EEA Monograph 5, 141 pp. EEA, Copenhagen 1998.

  • Romieu, I. (1992): Epidemiological studies of the health effects of air pollution due to motor vehicles. In:Mage, D.;Zaii, O. (Eds.): Motor vehicle air pollution: public health impact and control measures. Report WHO/PEP/92.4, World Health Organization Geneva; ECOTOX, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 13–62

    Google Scholar 

  • SCOPE (1995): Scientific workshop on indicators of sustainable development.Billharz, S.;Moldan, B. (Eds.): November 15–17 1995, Wuppertal, Germany. Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, B. (1995): Health and environmental aspects of hazardous air pollutants: where do we stand. In: Hazardous air pollutants, the London workshop. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France, pp. 141–154

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (1993): Agenda 21: programme of action for sustainable development. United Nations, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (1996): Indicators of sustainable development: framework and methodologies. United Nations, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP; WHO (1992): Urban air pollution in megacities of the world. United Nations Environment Programme. Nairobi; World Health Organization, Geneva; Blackwell, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP; WHO; MARC (1996): Air quality management and assessment capabilities in 20 major cities. Report no. UNEP/DEIA/AR.96.2; WHO/ EOS.95.7; United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi; World Health Organization, Geneva; Monitoring and Assessment Research Centre, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO-EURO (1987): Air quality guidelines for Europe. WHO Regional Office for Europe. WHO Regional Publications European Series no. 23. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO-EURO (1995): Concern for Europe’s tomorrow; health and the environment in the WHO European region. WHO Centre for Environment and Health, Bilthoven; World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO-EURO (1996): Revised WHO air quality guidelines for Europe. European Centre for Environment and Health, Bilthoven; World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peterson, P.J., Williams, W.P. New indicator approaches for effective urban air quality management. Environ. Sci. & Pollut. Res. 6, 225–232 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987334

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987334

Keywords

Navigation