Skip to main content
Log in

Partitioning of photoassimilates by potato plants (Solanum tuberosum l.) as influenced by irradiance: II. Partitioning patterns by four clones grown under high and low irradiance1

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is the second in a three-part series describing the influence of varied irradiance on growth and photoassimilate partitioning by potato plants. Four clones (Russet Burbank, Lemhi Russet, A66107-51, and A6948-4) were grown under two light regimes: a) high light levels (HL) of 500 to 1200 μE m-2 s-1, varying with changes in natural sunlight and time of day, and b) low light levels (LL) at approximately one quarter of high light (21 to 28%). Three weeks after tuber initiation, the most recently-matured leaf was labelled with14CO2, and plants were harvested: 1) one day after labelling, and 2) two weeks after labelling. Plants of all clones responded to the low light levels in a similar way by: 1) changing some morphological characteristics, 2) decreasing biomass accumulation and tuber yield, and 3) changing the sink-source relationship by promoting growth of leaves and stems at the expense of tubers. However, there were evident clonal differences in reactions to growth under low light; e.g., Lemhi Russet appeared to be most sensitive to light stress, while clones A66107-51 and A6848-4 were much less sensitive. No matter what the prior light history (HL or LL), clone A6948-4 was able to maintain higher rates of photosynthesis than the other clones at all light levels between 200 and 1200 μE m-2 s-1. This study showed that the potential exists to breed for cuttivars that can maintain higher rates of photosynthesis and higher tuber yield under low light levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Chapman, H.W. 1951. Absorption of CO2 by leaves of the potato. Am Potato J 28:602–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chapman, H.W. and W.E. Loomis. 1953. Photosynthesis in potato under field conditions. Plant Physiol 28:703–716.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dwelle, R.B., G.E. Kleinkopf, R.K. Steinhorst, JJ. Pavek and P.J. Hurley. 1981. The influence of physiological processes on tuber yield of potato clonesSolanum tubero- sum L.: Stomatal diffusive resistance, stomatal conductance, gross photosynthetic rate, leaf canopy, tissue nutrient levels and tuber enzyme activities. Potato Res 24:33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dwelle, R.B., P.J. Hurley and J.J. Pavek. 1983. Photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of potato clones(Solarium tuberosum L.) Plant Physiol 72:172–176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gawronska, H. and R. B. Dwelle. 1989. Partitioning of photoassimilates by potato plants(Solarium tuberosum L.) as influenced by irradiance. I. Partitioning patterns in cultivar Russet Burbank grown under high and low irradiance. Am Potato J 66:201–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ku, S., G.E. Edwards and C.B. Tanner. 1977. Effect of light, carbon dioxide, and temperature on photosynthesis, oxygen inhibition of photosynthesis and transpiration inSolanum tuberosum. Plant Physiol 59:886–872.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Menzel, C.M. 1982. The control of tuberization in potato(Solanum tuberosum L.) at high temperatures. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Queensland. Dept. of Botany, pp. 227–235.

  8. Menzel, C.M. 1985. Tuberization in potato at high temperatures: Interaction between temperatures and irradiance. Ann Bot 55:33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moll, A. 1980. Die Photosyntheserate wS.hrend der Entwicklung de1- Kartoffelpflanze. Potato Res 23:319–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moll, A. and W. Henninger. 1978. Genotypishe Photosyntheserate yon Kartoffeln und ihre mögliche Rolle für Ertragsbildung. Photosynthetica 12(1):51–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nösberger, J. and E.C. Humphries. 1965. The influence of removing tubers on dry matter production and net assimilation rate of potato plants. Ann Bot N.S. 29(116):579–588.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sale, P.J.M. 1973. Productivity of vegetable crops in a region of high solar input. I. Growth and development of the potato(Solanum tuberosum L.). Austr J Agric Res 24:733–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sale, P.J.M. 1974. Productivity of vegetable crops in a region of high solar input. III. Carbon balance of potato crops. Austr J Plant Physiol 1:283–296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. WinNer, E. 1971. Potato cultivation in Tyrol. II. Photosynthetic efficiency and respiration in different potato varieties. Potato Res 14:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zrust, J. 1983. The photosynthetic rate in different potato genotypes. Rostl Vyroba 29(6):563–576.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zrust, J. and A. Smolikova. 1977. Differences in assimilation rate in potato hybrids and in some parental varieties. Rostl Vyroba 23(7):723–732.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Approved for publication by the Director of the Idaho Agric. Expt. Station as research paper No. 88736. Supported in part by the Idaho Potato Commission and by the United States Department of Agriculture Competitive Research Grant No. 59-2161-1-1-654.0.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gawronska, H., Dwelle, R.B. & Pavek, J.J. Partitioning of photoassimilates by potato plants (Solanum tuberosum l.) as influenced by irradiance: II. Partitioning patterns by four clones grown under high and low irradiance1. American Potato Journal 67, 163–176 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987069

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987069

Additional key words

Navigation