Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Review of Recent Research on “Pelmatozoans”

  • Published:
Paläontologische Zeitschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This review is a presentation of progressive knowledge gained on the three subphyla Homalozoa (= Carpoidea), Blastozoa and Crinozoa during the las decade — i. e. after drafting of the manuscripts for the Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, vols. S 1(1) and S 1(2) of 1967.

Concerning the Crinoidea, the Treatise volume of which has not appeared yet, the accounting period covers two decades.

Zusammenfassung

Für die drei Subphyla Homalozoa (= Carpoidea), Blastozoa und Crinozoa und damit für das Gros der » Pelmatozoa« werden die im letzten Jahrzehnt, also nach Niederschrift der Treatise-Manuskripte der Bände S 1(1) und S 1(2) (1967), gewonnenen Erkenntnisschritte dargestellt.

Nur für die Crinoidea, deren Treatise-Band noch aussteht, beträgt der erfaßte Zeitraum zwei Jahrzehnte.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

5. References

  • Anderson, H.-J.:Himerometra grippi n. sp. (Crinoidea Articulata): eine freischwimmende Seelilie aus dem niederrheinischen Oberoligocän. — Geologica Palaeont.,1, 179–182, Marburg 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Yu. A.: O povrezhdenijakh morskikh lily vyzvadnikh Schizoproboscina [On the injuries in crinoids made by Schizoproboscina]. — Paleont. Zh.,1961, 101–106, Moskva 1961 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Krona morskoy lilii iz srednego ordovika r. Podkamennoy Tunguski. — Paleont. Zh.,1963, 131–135, Moskva 1963 (Russian; transl. in Int. geol. Rev.,7, 1116–1120: Crown of a crinoid from the Middle Ordovician of Podkamannaya Tunguska River).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— K poznaniyu morskikh lily kaltsekrinidi [Contribution to the knowledge of crinoids of the family Calceocrinidae]. — Paleont. Zh.,1965, 89–96, Moskva 1965 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • -Arendt, Yu. A. Regressivnie i neotenicheskie javleniya i krinoidey Hypocrinidae [Regressive and neotenous instances in crinoids of the Hypocrinidae]. — Trudy XII Sess. Vses. paleont. Obshck. (Zakonomernosti rasvitiya organidieskogo mira po dannim paleontologii), Izd. » Nauka«, Leningrad 1968 (Russian).

  • —— Morskie lilii hipokrinidi [Crinoids of the order Hypocrinidae]. — Akad. Nauk SSSR, Trudy paleont. Inst.,128, 220 pp., Moskva 1970 (1970 a) (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Ruki fillokrinusov (Crinoidea, Cyrtocrinida) [The arms of Phyllocrinus, Crinoidea, Cyrtocrinida]. — Paleont. Zh.,1970, 113–116, Moskva 1970 (1970 b) (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Rudimentarnie organi hipokrinid [Rudimentary organs in Hypocrinida]. — Akad. Nauk SSSR-paleont. Inst., Trudy,130, 168–173, Moskva 1971 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Morskie lilii tsirtokrinidi [Crinoids of the order Cyrtocrinida]. — Akad. Nauk SSSR, Trudy Paleont. Inst.,144, 251 pp., Moskva 1974 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Yu. A.;Breimer, A. &Macurda, D.B.: A new blastoid fauna from the Lower Namurian of North Kazachstan (U.S.S.R.). — Koninkl. nederl. Akad. Wetensch., Proc., B,71, 159–174, Amsterdam 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Yu. A. &Janin, B. T.: O pozdneyurskikh i rannemelovikh krinoideyakh Krima [On Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous crinoids of the Crimea]. — Paleont. Zh.,1964, 140–142, Moskva 1964 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmayer, F.:Pseudosaccocoma (Crinoidea) aus dem Korallenriffkalk (Obermalm) von Ernstbrunn (Niederösterreich). — Palaont. Z.,32, 40–51, Stuttgart 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassler, R. S. &Moodey, M. W.: Bibliographic and faunal index of Paleozoic pelmatozoan echinoderms. — Geol. Soc. Amer., spec. Pap.,45, VI + 734 pp., Baltimore 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, D. E.: A new Ordovician crinoid from Dolgellan, North Wales. — Palaeontology,8, 355–357, London 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— On “Dendrocrinus” cambriensis Hicks, the earliest known crinoid. — Palaeontology,11, 406–409, London 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— A new Devonian crinoid from Australia. — Palaeontology,15, 326–355, London 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, H. H.;Fay, R. O.;Macurda, Jr., D. B.;Moore, R. C. &Wanner, J.: Blastoids. — Treatise Invert. Paleont., S, 297–455, Univ. Kansas, Lawrence, Kans. 1967.

  • Bockelie, J. F.: The presence ofPrunocystites (Cystoidea) in stage 9 e of Ringerike, Norway. — Norsk geol. Tidsskr.,53, 317–321, Oslo 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouška, J.: On the occurrence of the genusProtaxocrinus Springer (Crinoidea) in the Silurian of Bohemia. — Sborn. Úst. Úst. Geol., Palaeont.,22, 323–333, Praha 1956 (1956 a) (Czech., Russian, English).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Pisocrinidae Angelin českého siluru a devonu (Crinoidea). — Rozpr. Úst. Úst. Geol.,20, 1–138, Praha 1956 (1956 b) [Czech., with Russian Summary at p. 55 and English Summary at p. 101: Pisocrinidae from the Silurian and Devonian of Bohemia (Crinoidea)].

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowsher, A. L.: The effect of the crinoid host on the variability of Permian platyceratids. — [In:] Yochelson, E. L.: Permian Gastropoda of the southwestern United States. Amer. Mus. natur. Hist., Bull,110, 173–276, New York 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breimer, A.: On the structure and systematic position of the genusRhipidocrinus Beyrich, 1879. — Leidse geol. Mededel,25, 247–260, Leiden 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Breimer, A. A monograph on Spanish Palaeozoic Crinoidea. 180 pp. — Leiden 1962. (Also in Leidse geol. Mededel.27.)

  • —— On a specimen ofPleurocystites (Cystoidea) from an erratic boulder near Westerhaar (Netherlands). — Koninkl. nederl. Akad. Wetensch., Proc, B,66, 296–302, Amsterdam 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— A contribution to the paleoecology of Palaeozoic stalked crinoids. — Koninkl. nederl. Akad. Wetensch., Proc, B,72, 139–150, Amsterdam 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breimer, A. &Macurda Jr.,D. B.: On the systematic position of some blastoid genera from the Permian of Timor. — Koninkl. nederl. Akad. Wetensch., Proc, B,68, 209–217, Amsterdam 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— The phylogeny of the fissiculate blastoids. — Koninkl. nederl. Akad. Wetensch., Afd. Natuurk., Verh., Eerste Reeks,26, 3, 389 pp., Amsterdam (North Holland Publ. Co.) 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Paleozoic blastoids [In:]Hallam, A. (Ed.): Atlas of palaeobiogeography, 207–212. — Amsterdam, London, New York (Elsevier Sci. Publ. Co.) 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breimer, A.;Macurda Jr.,D. B. &Prokop, R. J.: New Lower Devonian blastoids from Bohemia. — Koninkl. nederl. Akad. Wetensch., Proc, B,71, 124–136, Amsterdam 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhead, Th. W.: Reevaluation of the morphology ofAmecystis laevis (Raymond). — J. Paleont.,48, 670–673, Tulsa, Okla., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brover, J. C.: The genus,Steganocrinus. — J. Paleont.,39, 773–793, Tulsa, Okla., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Functional morphology of Calceocrinidae with description of some new species. — J. Paleont.,40, 613–634, Tulsa, Okla., 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— The actinocrinitid generaAbactinocrinus, Aacocrinus andBlairocrinus. — J. Paleont.,41, 675–705, Tulsa, Okla., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Crinoids. [In:]McKee, E. D. &Gutschick, R. C.: History of the Redwell Limestone of northern Arizona. — Geol. Soc. Amer., Mem,114, XXIII + 726 pp., Boulder, Colorado, 1969 (1969 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Essay review. Treatise on invertebrate palaeontology: Part S, Echinodermata 1 — General characters, Homalozoa — Crinozoa (except Crinoidea). — J. Paleont.,43, 843–848, Tulsa, Okla., 1969 (1969 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Crinoids from the Girardeau Limestone (Ordovician). — Palaeontogr. Amer.,7, 46, 259–499, Ithaca, N.Y., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Upper Ordovician xenocrinids (Crinoidea Camerata) from Scotland. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contrib.,67, 1–25, Lawrence, Kans., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower, J. C. &Veinus, J.: Middle Ordovician crinoids from southwestern Virginia and eastern Tennessee. — Bull. Amer. Paleont.,66, 283, 1–125, Ithaca, N.Y., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, I. A.: A new cystoid (Pelmatozoa, Echinodermata) from the Silurian of New South Wales. — Proc. linn. Soc. New South Wales,88, 386–391, Sydney 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— An Ordovician cystoid (Pelmatozoa, Echinodermata) from Western Australia. — J. roy. Soc. Western Australia,47, 3–7, Perth 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdick, D. W. &Strimple, H. L.: Revision of some Chesterian inadunate crinoids. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contrib.,40, 1–14, Lawrence, Kans., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— The occurrence ofPterocrinus in Oklahoma. — Oklahoma geol. Notes,30, 121–123, Norman, Okla., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Crinoids from the Beech Creek Limestone, Lower Golconda Group, St. Clair County, Illinois. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contrib.,51, 15–47, Lawrence, Kans., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Flexible crinoids from the Fayetteville Formation (Chesterian) of northeastern Oklahoma. — J. Paleont.,47, 226–230, Tulsa, Okla., 1973 (1973 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— New late Missisissippi crinoids from Arkansas. — J. Paleont.,47, 231–243, Tulsa, Okla., 1973 (1973 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabibel, J.;Termier, H. &Termier, G.: Les échinodermes Mésocambriens de la Montagne Noire (Sud de la France). — Ann. Paléont.,44, 281–294, Paris 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, J. D. B.: Aspects of the depositional environment and palaeoecology of crinoidal limestones. — Scott. J. Geol.,4, 191–208, Edinburgh 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campredon, R.;Bodelle, J. G. &Villotreys, O. de: Découverted’ Isselicrinus didactylus (D’Orb., in Archiac) et deConocrinus thorenti d’Archiac dans les marnes éocènes du Synclinal d’Annot (Basses-Alpes). — C. R. Hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci.,226 D, 83–85, Paris 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caster, K. E.: Les échinodermes carpoïdes de l’Ordovicien inférieur de la Montagne Noire (France), by G. Ubaghs, 1969. — J. Paleont.,45, 919–920, Tulsa, Okla., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvel, J.: Échinodermes de l’Ordovicien du Maroc. — Cahiers de Paléontologie, 120 pp., Paris 1966.

  • —— Présence du genreDestombesia Chauvel (échinoderme cystoid) dans l’Ordovicien du Massif armoricain. — C. R. Somm. Soc. géol. France,3, 111–112, Paris 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Les échinodermes macrocystellides de l’Anti-Atlas marocain. — Soc. Géol. Minéral. Bretagne, Bull., Sér. C,1, 21–32, Rennes 1969 (1969 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Données nouvelles sur le genreDestombesia Chauvel (échinoderme cystoïde. Ordovicien de I’Anti-Atlas marocain). — Notes Serv. Géol. Maroc,29 (Notes et Mém. 213), 25–30, Rabat 1969 (1969 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Les échinodermes carpoïdes du Paléozoïque inférieur marocain. — Notes Serv. Géol. Maroc,31, 49–60, Rabat 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Les échinodermes cystoides de l’Ordovicien de Cabo de Peñas (Asturies). — Breviora Geologica Asturica,17, 30–32, Oviedo 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvel, J. &Le Menn, J.: Échinodermes de l’Ordovicien supérieur de Coat-Carrec, Argol (Finistère). — Bull. Soc. Géol. Minéral. Bretagne, 1972, (C),4, 1, 39–61, Rennes 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvel, J. &Nion, J.: Sur la présence dePhlyctocystis Chauvel, 1966, échinoderme Cystoïde, dans l’Ordovicien de la presquile de Crozon (Finistère). — Bull. Soc. géol. France, (7),11, 443–446, Paris 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Closset, J.:Stenocrinus arduennensis (Crinoidea Camerata), espéce nouvelle du Dévonien inférieur de la Belgique. — Bull. Inst. roy. Sci. natur. Belg.,46, (29), 1–17, Bruxelles 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colchen, M. &Ubaghs, G.: Sur les restes d’échinodermes (?) du Cambro-Ordovicien de la Sierra de la Demanda (Burgos-Logrono, Espagne). — Bull. Soc. géol. France, (7),11, 649–654, Paris 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaconu, M.: On some crinoids in the Ladinian of the Padurea Crainlui Mts. — Dari Seama Sedint. Bucuresti,55, Paleontol. 1967-68, 5–7, Bucuresti 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubatolova, Yu. A.: Morskie lilii devona Kuzbassa [Devonian crinoids of the Kuznetsk Basin]. — Akad. Nauk SSSR, Sibirsk. Otdel., Inst. Geol. i Geofis., 154 pp., Moskva (Izdat. »Nauka«) 1964 (Russian).

  • - Devonskie krinoidei khrebta Tas-Khayakhtakh (Severo-Vostok SSSR) [Devonian crinoids from the Tas-Khaykhtakh Mountains (North-East SSSR)]. — Akad. Nauk SSSR, Sibirsk. Otdel., Inst. Geol. i Geofis., Novie dannie po biostratigrafii devona i verkhnego paleozoya Sibiri, 32–41, Moskva (Izdat »Nauka«) 1967 (Russian).

  • Dubatolova, Yu. A. &Shao, C.: Stebli morskikh lilii kammennougolnikh, permskikh i triasovykh otlozhenii yuzhnogo Kitaia [Crinoid stems from Carboniferous, Permian, and Triassic deposits of southern China]. — Acta Palaeont. Sinica,7, 41–83, Peking 1959 (Chinese and Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubatolova, Yu. A., Yeltysheva, R. S. & Modzalevskaya, E. A.: Morskie lilii devona i nizhnego Karbona Dalnego Vostoka. [Devonian and Lower Carboniferous crinoids of the Far East]. — Akad. Nauk SSSR, Sibirsk. Otdel., Inst. Geol. i Geofis., 79 pp., Moskva (Izdat. »Nauka«) 1967 (Russian).

  • Eaton, T. H.: The stem-tail problem and the ancestry of chordates. — J. Paleont.,44, 969–979, Tulsa, Okla., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, R. O.: Blastoid studies. — Univ. of Kansas, paleontol. Contrib., Echinodermata,3, 1–147, Lawrence, Kans., 1961 (1961 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— The type species ofStephanocrinus Conrad. — Oklahoma geol. Notes,21, 236–238, Norman, Okla., 1961 (1961 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Mespilocystites, an Ordovician coronate crinoid from Czechoslovakia. — Oklahoma geol. Notes,22, 156–161, Norman, Okla., 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Parablastoids. — Treatise Invert. Paleont. S. 293–296, Univ. Kansas, Lawrence, Kans., 1967 (1967 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • - Evolution of the Blastoidea. — Univ. Kansas Dept. Geol. Spec. Publ.2: Essays in Paleontology & Stratigraphy. Raymond C. Moore Commemorative Volume, 242–286, Lawrence, Kans., 1967 (1967 b).

  • Fell, H. B.: A classification of echinoderms. — Tuatara,10, 138–140, Wellington, N. Z., 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— The evolution of the echinoderms. — Smithsonian Inst., ann. Rept. 1962, 457–490, Washington 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Ecology of crinoids. Pp. 49–62 [In:]Boolootian, R. A. (Ed.): Physiology of Echinodermata, Intersci. Publ., New York 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flügel, H. W.:Iranoblastus, a new Mississippian blastoid from Iran. — Geol. Surv. Iran, Rep.,6, 55–57, Teheran 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzén, C.: Epizoans on Silurian-Devonian crinoids. — Lethaia,7, 287–301, Oslo 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frest, T. &Paul, C. R. C.:Callocystites brevis, a new Silurian rhombiferan cystoid from Indiana. — Geol. Mag.,108, 425–432, London 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaspard, D. &Roux, M.: Quelques aspects de la fossilisation des tests chez les brachiopodes et les crinoïdes. Relation entre la présence de matière organique et le développement d’agregats ferrifères. — Géobios,7, 81–89, Lyon 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girod, J.-P.: Sur trois comatules du Vercors. — Trav. Lab. Géol. Univ. Grenoble,40, 127–130, Grenoble 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldring, W.: Devonian crinoids: New and old, II. — New York State Mus., Circular37, 1–51, Albany, N.Y., 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, V. J. &Webster, G. D.:Stephanocrinus angulatus Conrad (Crinoidea) from the Silurian of Kashmir. — Palaeontology,14, 262–265, London 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattin, D. E.: Regeneration in a Pennsylvanian crinoid spine. — J. Paleont.,32, 701–702, Tulsa, Okla., 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haude, R.: Bau und Funktion derScyphocrinites-Lobolithen. — Lethaia5, 95–125, Oslo 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugh, B. N.: Water vascular system of the Crinoidea Camerata. — J. Paleont.,47, 77–90, Tulsa, Okla., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecker (Gekker), R. F.: Neues über die GattungAchradocystites (Echinodermata, Paracrinoidea). — ENSV Tead. Akad. Geol. Inst. Uurim.,3, 145–162, Tallinn 1958 (Russian, with English summary at p. 161-162).

    Google Scholar 

  • - (ed.): Osnovy paleontologii. Iglokozhie, hemikhordovye, pogonofory i shchetinkochelyustnye, 383 pp. (Pelmatozoa at pp. 23–105). — Moskva 1964.

  • Hecker (Gekker), E. L. &Hecker (Gekker), R. F.: On a new species of the genusProtocrinites Eichwald [title translated from the Russian]. — Ann. Soc. paléont. Russe,16, 274–279, Moskva 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, H.: Zur Kenntnis der Crinoidenfauna der Schweizer Jura. I. Die Gattungsmerkmale vonIsocrinus undPentacrinus. — Eclogae geol. Helvetiae,48, 468–486, Basel 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, A. S.: Crinoids from the Glen Dean Limestone (Middle Chester) of southern Indiana and Kentucky. — Indiana Dept. Conserv., Geol. Surv. Bull.,34, 52 pp., Bloomington, Indiana, 1965.

  • Horowitz, A. S. &Strimple, H. L.: Chesterian echinoderm zonation in eastern United States. — C. R. Sept. Congr. int. Strat. Géol. Carbon,3, 207–220, Krefeld 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, A. S. &Waters, J. A.: A Mississippian echinoderm site in Alabama. — J. Paleont.,46, 660–665, Tulsa, Okla., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckriede, R.;Kürsten, M. &Venzlaff, H.: Zur Geologie des Gebietes zwischen Kerman und Sagand (Iran). — Beih. geol. Jb. (Niedersächsische Landesamt Bodenforschung),51, 197 pp., Hannover 1962.

  • Hudson, R. G. S.;Clarke, M. J. &Sevastopulo, G. D.: The palaeoecology of a Lower Visean crinoid fauna from Feltrim, Co. Dublin. — Sci. Proc. roy. Dublin Soc, Ser. A,2, 273–286, Dublin 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janicke, V.:Lumbricaria — ein Cephalopoden-Koprolith. — N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Mh.,1970, 50–60, 7 Abb., Stuttgart 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies, R. P. S.: Some fossil chordates with echinoderm affinities. — Symp. Zool. Soc. London,20, 163–208, London 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— The subphylum Calcichordata (Jefferies 1967), primitive fossil chordates with echinoderm affinities. — Bull. Brit. Mus. (natur. Hist.), Geol.,16, 243–339, London 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Ceratocystis perneri Jaekel — a Middle Cambrian chordate with echinoderm affinities. — Palaeontology,12, 494–535, London 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— The Ordovician fossilLagynocystis pyramidalis (Barrande) and the ancestry ofAmphioxus. — Philos. Trans, roy. Soc. London, B,265, 409–469, London 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies, R. P. S.;Josey, K. A.;Paul, C. R. C. &Ramsbottom, W. H. C.: Echinodermata: Pelmatozoa. — [In:] Harland et al. (Eds.): The fossil record, Geol. Soc. London. 565–581, London 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies, R. P. S. &Prokop, R. J.: A new calcichordate from the Ordovician of Bohemia and its anatomy, adaptations and relationships. — Biol. J. linn. Soc,4, 69–115, London 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffords, R. M. &Miller, T. H.: Ontogenetic development in Late Pennsylvanian crinoid columnals and pluricolumnals. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr., Echinodermata,10, 1–14, Lawrence, Kans., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaljo, D. L. (Ed.): Silur Estonii. — Eesti NSV Tead. Akad. geol. Inst., 383 pp., Tallin 1970 (Russian, with Englih Summary pp. 329– 343: The Silurian of Estonia).

  • Kesling, R. V.: Notes onJaekelocystis hartleyi andPseudocrinites gordoni, two rhombiferan cystoids described by Charles Schuchert in 1903. — Contr. Mus. Paleont., Univ. Mich.,16, 245–273, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Morphology and taxonomy of the cystoidCheirocrinus anatiformis (Hall). — Contr. Mus. Paleont., Univ. Mich.,18, 1–21, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Key for the classification of cystoids. — Contr. Mus. Paleont., Univ. Mich.,17, 123–148, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1963 (1963 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Occurrence and variations of Botryocrinus thomasi Laudon in the Thunder Bay Limestone of Michigan. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,18, 231–244, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1963 (1963 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Decadocrinus hughwingi, a new Middle Devonian crinoid from the Silica Formation in northwestern Ohio. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,19, 135–142, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1964 (1964 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Two new crinoids of the family Periechocrinitidae from the Middle Devonian Thunder Bay Limestone of Michigan. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,19, 143–155, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1964 (1964 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Nature and occurrence ofGennaeocrinus goldringae Ehlers. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,19, 265–280, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1965 (1965 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Primibrachials and arms ofAlloprosallocrinus conicus Casseday and Lyon, a Lower Mississippian camerate crinoid. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,19, 257–263, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1965 (1965 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Proctothylacocrinus esseri, a new crinoid from the Middle Devonian Silica Formation of northwestern Ohio. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,20, 75–87, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1965 (1965 c).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Botryocrinus niemani, a new crinoid from the Middle Devonian Silica Formation, Ohio. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,20, 271–276, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Cystoids. — Treatise Invert. Paleont., S, S85-S267, Univ. Kansas, Lawrence, Kans., 1967 (1967 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Paracrinoids. — Treatise Invert. Paleont., S, S268–288, Univ. Kansas, Lawrence, Kans., 1967 (1967 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Ameliacrinus benderi, a new dicyclic camerate crinoid from the Middle Devonian Silica Formation in northwestern Ohio. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,22, 155–162, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1968 (1968 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Gennaeocrinus chilmanae, a new crinoid from the Middle Devonian Silica Formation in southeastern Michigan. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,22, 127–131, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1968 (1968 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Logocrinus conicus, a simple new Middle Devonian inadunate crinoid from Michigan. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,22, 163–167, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1968 (1968 c).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Note on ontogeny of the Middle Devonian crinoidProctothylacocrinus esseri Kesling. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,22, 113–138, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1968 (1968 d).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Growth patterns inProctothylacocrinus longus KIER. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,22, 313–322, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1969 (1969 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Two new crinoids from the Middle Devonian Silica Formation. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,22, 199–206, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1969 (1969 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Arms ofDecadocrinus hughwingi Kesling. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,23, 193–199, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1971 (1971 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Dolatocrinus kutasii, a new crinoid from the Middle Devonian Bell Shale of Michigan. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,23, 201–211, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1971 (1971 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Proctothylacocrinus herryorum, a new crinoid from the Middle Devonian Arkona Shale of Ontario. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,21, 343–347, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1971 (1971 c).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Two new crinoids of the family Scytalocrinidae from the Middle Devonian Silica Formation of northwestern Ohio. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,23, 283–289, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1971 (1971 d).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— A new species ofPorocrinus from the Middle Ordovician Kimmswick Limestone of Missouri. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,24, 1–7, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— NewBotryocrinus andGlossocrinus from the Middle Devonian Bell Shale of Michigan. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,24, 31–46, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesling, R. V.;Macurda, D. B. &Paul, C. R. C.: Cystoidea, Blastoidea, and Edrioasteroidea. [In:]Moore, R. C. et al.: Developments trends, and outlooks in paleontology. — J. Paleont.,42, 1370–1371, Tulsa, Okla., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesling, R. V. &Meyer, D. L.: The crinoidOpsiocrinus mariae Kier in the Bell Shale of Michigan. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Midi.,18, 177–184, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesling, R. V. &Mintz, L. W.:Dolatocrinus andStereocrinus, its junior synonym. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,18, 229–237, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1963 (1963 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Species of the crinoidDolatocrinus from the Middle Devonian Dock Street Clay of Michigan. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,23, 67–100, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1963 (1963 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesling, R. V. &Paul, C. R. C.: New Species of Porocrinidae and brief remarks upon these unusual crinoids. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,22, 1–32, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Agostocrinus andAcolocrinus, two new Ordovician crinoids with peculiar ray and respiratory structures. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,23, 221–237, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesling, R. V. &Sigler, J. P.:Cunctocrinus, a new Middle Devonian calceocrinid crinoid from the Silica Shale of Ohio. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,24, 339–360, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesling, R. V. &Smith, R. N.:Gennaeocrinus variabilis, a new species of crinoid from the Middle Devonian Bell Shale of Michigan. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,17, 173–194, Ann Arbor, Mich. 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— The crinoidSynbathocrinus in the Middle Devonian Traverse Group of Michigan. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,18, 185–196, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesling, R. V. &Strimple, H. L.:Entaxocrinus wideneri, a new flexible crinoid from the Middle Devonian Silica Formation of northwestern Ohio. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,19, 291–303, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kier, P. M.: Infrabasals in the crinoidOpsiocrinus Kier. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,14, 201–206, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, D. L. &Strimple, H. L.: A new Upper Devonian cystoid attached to a discontinuity surface. — Iowa geol. Surv., Rep. Invest.,5, 49 pp., Iowa City, Iowa, 1968.

  • Koenig, J. W.: Ontogeny of two Devonian crinoids. — J. Paleont.,39, 398–413, Tulsa, Okla., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, J. W. &Meyer, D. L.: Two new crinoids from the Devonian of New York. — J. Paleont.,39, 391–397, Tulsa, Okla., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolata, D. R.:Scalenocystis strimplei, a new Middle Ordovician belemnocystitid solute from Minnesota. — J. Paleont.,47, 969–974, Tulsa, Okla., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasnov, E. V. et al. (Eds): The biology of marine molluscs and echinoderms. Abstracts of papers to be delivered at Soviet-Japanese symposium on marine biology, 68 pp. — USSR Academy of Sciences. Far East Science Centre. Vladivostok 1974. [A Russian edition brings a less abridged account of the several papers; there is a slight difference in contents of the two editions]

  • Kristan-Tollmann, E. &Tollmann, A.: Crinoiden aus dem zentralalpinen Anis (Leithagebirge, Thorler Zug und Radstädter Tauern). — Wiss. Arb. Burgenland,36, 5–55, Eisenstadt 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, N. G.: Meristic variation in the dorsal cup of monobathrid camerate crinoids. — J. Paleont.,37, 917–930, Tulsa, Okla., 1963 (1963 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— The Berkeley crinoid collection from Crawfordsville, Indiana. — J. Paleont.,37, 1001–1008, Tulsa, Okla., 1963 (1963 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Inadunate crinoids from the Pennsylvanian of Brazil. — J. Paleont.,38, 362–366, Tulsa, Okla., 1964 (1964 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— New Pennsylvanian crinoids from Clark County, Nevada. — J. Paleont.,38, 679–684, Tulsa, Okla., 1964 (1964 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Revision of suborder Cyathocrinina (class Crinoidea). — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,24, 1–13, Lawrence, Kans., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Lower and Middle Ordovician crinoids from west-central Utah. — Brigham Young Univ. Stud. Geol.,17, 3–17, Provo, Utah, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Synecology of Middle Mississippian (Carboniferous) crinoid communities in Indiana. — Int. Geol. Congr. 24th Sess., Sect.7, 89–94, Montreal 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, N. G. &Webster, G. D.: New Permian crinoid fauna from southern Nevada. — Univ. Calif. Publ. Geol. Sci.,63, 87 pp., Berkeley-Los Angeles 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Symmetry planes of Paleozoic crinoids. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contrib.25, 14–16, Lawrence, Kans., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudon, L. R.: Crinoids, pp.961–972, [In:]Ladd, H. S. (Ed.): Treatise on marine ecology and paleoecology, 2, Paleoecology. — Mem. geol. Soc. Amer., 67, Boulder, Col., 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudon, L. R.: Ontogeny of the Mississippian crinoidPlatycrinites bozemanensis (Miller & Gurley), 1897. — J. Paleont.41, 1492–1497, Tulsa, Okla., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefeld, J.:Dadocrinus gmndeyi Langeman (Crinoidea) from the High-Tatric Middle Triassic in the Tatra Mountains (Poland). — Acta palaeont. Polon.,3, 59–74, Warszawa 1958 (Polish, English, and Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefeld, J. &Radwanski, A.: Les crinoïdes planctoniquesSaccocoma Agassiz dans le malm et et le néocomien Haut-Tatrique des Tatras Polonaises. — Acta geol. Polon.,10, 593–614, Warszawa 1960 (Polish, English, and French).

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Menn, J.: Les crinoïdes du Siegenien supérieur de la rade de Brest (Finistère). — Fac. Sci. Rennes, Thèse 3e cycle, 107 pp., Rennes 1970.

  • Linck, O.: Eine weitere Crinoide(Entrochus multifurcatus n. sp.) aus dem Hauptmuschelkalk. — Beitr. Naturk. Forsch. Südwest-Deutschl.,24, 31–35, 1965 (1965 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Stratigraphische, stratinomische und ökologische Betrachtungen zuEncrinus liliiformis Lamarck. — Jb. geol. Landesanst. Bad.-Wiirtt.,7, 123–148, Freiburg i. Br. 1965 (1965 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccagno, A. M.: Contributo alla conoscenza della fauna ordoviciana della Sardegna. Gli Echinodermi di Portixeddu. 1. — Soc. Naz. Sci. Lett. Art. Napoli, Atti Acc. Sci. Fis. Mat., Ser. 3,5, 147–197, Napoli 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macurda jr.,D. B.: The Lower Carboniferous (Tournaisian) blastoids of Belgium. — J. Paleont.,41, 455–486, Tulsa, Okla., 1967 (1967 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— A Permian blastoid from the Canadian Arctic. — J. Paleont.,41, 1282–1284, Tulsa, Okla., 1967 (1967 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Ontogeny of the crinoidEucalyptocrinites. — J. Paleont.,42, II (Paleont. Soc., Mem., 2), 99–118, Tulsa, Okla., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Blastoids. [In:]McKee, E. D. &Gutschick, R. C.: History of the Redwall Limestone of northern Arizona. — Geol. Soc. Amer., Mem.114, XXIII + 726 pp., Boulder, Colorado, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— The type species of the Permian blastoidCalycoblastus. — J. Paleont.,46, 94–98, Tulsa, Okla., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Ecology of comatulid crinoids at Grand Bahama Island. — Hydro-Lab. J.,2, 9–24. Freeport, Grand Bahama Island, 1973 (1973 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— The stereomic microstructure of the blastoid endoskeleton. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,24, 69–83, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1973 (1973 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— A quantitative phyletic study of the camerate crinoid families Actinocrinitidae and Periechocrinitidae and its taxonomic implications. — J. Paleont.,48, 820–832, Tulsa, Okla., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macurda jr.,D. B. &Meyer, D. L.: Feeding posture of Modern stalked crinoids. — Nature,247, 394–396, London 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, G. C. &Schreiber, R. L.: Morphology and taxonomy of the Middle Devonian crinoidAncyrocrinus bulbosus Hall 1862. — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,23, 381–403, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannil, R.: Novie predstaviteli rodaHoplocrinus iz srednego ordovika Estonii. — Tartu Riikl. Ülik. Toimet,75, 82–98, Tartu 1959 (Russian, with English summary at p. 96: New representatives ofHoplocrinus from the Middle Ordovician of Estonia).

    Google Scholar 

  • - Istorya razvitya Baltiyskogo Basseyna v ordovike. — Eesti NSV Tead. Akad. Geol. Inst., 247 pp., Tallin 1966 (Russian, with English Summary pp. 190–199: Evolution of the Baltic Basin during the Ordovician).

  • Manten, A.: Palaeoecology of Silurian crinoids of Gotland (Sweden). — Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimat. Palaeoecol.,7, 171–184, Amsterdam 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • - Silurian reefs of Gotland. — Developments in sedimentology,13, 539 pp., Elsevier, Amsterdam 1971.

  • Merta, T.:Bourgueticrinus utriculatus (Valette) from the Senonian of the Cracow upland. — Acta geol. Polon.,22, 541–544, Warszawa 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. L.: Plate growth in some platycrinid crinoids. — J. Paleont.,39, 1207–1209, Tulsa, Okla., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— The collagenous nature of problematical ligaments in crinoids (Echinodermata). — Marine Biology,9, 235–241, Berlin 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, L. W.: The Edrioblastoidea: re-evaluation based on a new specimen ofAstrocystites from the Middle Ordovician of Ontario. — J. Paleont.,44, 872–880, Tulsa, Okla., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. C.: Echinodermata: Pelmatozoa. [In:] “Status of invertebrate paleontology” (Ed.B. Kummel). — Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard College, Bull.,112, 127–149, Cambridge, Mass., 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. C.: Ray structures of some inadunate crinoids. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr., Echinodermata,5, 1–47, Lawrence, Kans., 1962 (1962 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Revision of Calceocrinidae. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr., Echinodermata,4, 1–40, Lawrence, Kans., 1962 (1962 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Unique stalked crinoids from Upper Cretaceous of Mississippi. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,17, 1–35, Lawrence, Kans., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. C. &Jeffords, R. M.: Classification and nomenclature of fossil crinoids based on studies of dissociated parts of their columns. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,9, 1–86, Lawrence, Kans., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. C.;Jeffords, R. M. &Miller, T. H.: Morphological features of crinoid columns. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr., Echinodermata,8, 1–30, Lawrence, Kans., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. C. &Laudon, L. R.: Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids. — Geol. Soc. Amer. spec. Pap.,46, 1–167, Baltimore 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. C. &Strimple, H. L.: Explosive evolutionary differentiation of unique group of Mississippian-Pennsylvanian camerate crinoids (Acrocrinidae). — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,39, 1–44,0 Lawrence, Kans., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • - Lower Pennsylvanian (Morrowan) crinoids from Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,60, (Echinodermata, 12), 84 pp., Lawrence, Kans., 1973.

  • Moore, R. C. &Vokes, H. E.: Lower Tertiary crinoids from northwestern Oregon. — Geol. Surv. prof. Pap.,233-E, 109–147, Washington, D. C., 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morzadec, P.: Sur la présence du genreAncyrocrinus Hall 1862 (crinoide) dans le Dévonien moyen du Massif Armoricain. — Bull. Soc. géol. Minéral. Bretagne, N. S.,1966, 26–32, Rennes 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mu, A. T.: [On the occurrence ofPisocrinus in China]. — Acta Palaeont. Sinica,2, 323–332, Peking 1956 (Chinese, with English summary at p. 329).

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, A. H.: ZumLumbricaria-Vroblem (Miscellanea), mit einigen Bemerkungen überSaccocoma (Crinoidea, Echinodermata). — Mber. dt. Akad. Wiss.,11, 750–758, Berlin 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nekvasilová, O. &Prokop, R.: Roveacrinidae (Crinoidea) from the Upper Cretaceous of Bohemia. — Věstn. Úst. Úst. Geol.,38, 49–52, Praha 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, D.: The water-vascular system in living and fossil echinoderms. — Palaeontology,15, 519–538, London 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, H.-U.: Röntgengefügeanalyse am Kalzit von Echinodermenskeletten. — N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh.,117, 230–234, Stuttgart 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orłowski, S.: Upper Cambrian fauna of the Holy Cross Mts. — Acta geol. Polon.,18, 257–291, Warszawa 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pabian, R. K. &Strimple, H. L.: Paleoecology of Pennsylvanian crinoids from southeastern Nebraska and southwestern Iowa. — 80th Proc. Nebraska Acad. Sci. Affil. Soc. April 24–25, 1970, Lincoln 1970.

  • ——Delocrinus brownvillensis Strimple from the vicinity of Fairfax, Oklahoma. — Okl. geol. Notes,33, 17–20, Norman, Okla., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Crinoid studies. Pt. I. Some Pennsylvanian crinoids from Nebraska Pt. II. Some Permian crinoids from Nebraska, Kansas, and Oklahoma. — Bull. Amer. Paleont.,64, (281), 245–337, Ithaca, N. Y., 1974 (1974 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Fossil crinoid studies. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,73, 1–54, Lawrence, Kans., 1974 (1974 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsley, R. L.: Revision of the North American Pleurocystitidae (Rhombifera-Cystoidea). — Bull. Amer. Paleont.,58, 131–213, Ithaca, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— The Belemnocystitidae: Solutan homeomorphs of the Anomalocystitidae. — J. Paleont.,46: 341–347, Tulsa, Okla., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrulius, D.: Die systematische Stellung vonPseudosaccocoma strambergensis Remes, ein aberranter Krinoid des Oberen Malms. — Bul. stiintific Acad. Républ. populaire Roumaine,1, 87–95, 5 Abb., Bukarest 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, C. R. C.: On the occurrence ofComarocystites orSinclairocystis (Paracrinoidea: Comarocystitidae) in the Starfish Bed, Threave Glen, Girvan. — Geol. Mag.,102, 474–477, London 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— The British Silurian cystoids. — Bull. Brit. Mus. (natur. Hist.), Geol.,13, 297–355, London 1967 (1967 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— A redescription of the cystoidLipsanocystis traversensis Ehlers & Leighly (Rhombifera: Callocystitidae). — Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,21, 205–217, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1967 (1967 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, C. R. C.:Hallicystis attenuta, a new callocystitid cystoid from the Racine dolomite of Wisconsin. — Contrib. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Mich.,21, 231–235, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1967 (1967 c).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Osculocystis, a new British Silurian cystoid. — Geol. Mag.,104, 449–454, London 1967 (1967 d).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— The functional morphology and mode of life of the cystoidPleurocystites,E. Billings, 1854. — Symp. Zool. Soc. London,20, 105–123, London 1967 (1967 e).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Macrocystella Galloway, the earliest glyptocystitid cystoid. — Palaeontology,11, 580–600, London 1968 (1968 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Notes on cystoids. — Geol. Mag.,105, 413–420, London 1968 (1968 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Morphology and function of dichoporite pore-structures in cystoids. — Palaeontology,11, 697–730, London 1968 (1968 c).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Thomacystis, a unique new hemicosmitid cystoid from Wales. — Geol. Mag.,106, 190–196, London 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— A second specimen ofOsculocystis Paul 1967. — Geol. Mag.,107, 383–387, London 1970 (1970 a).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— The aboral nervous system ofMarsupiocrinus Morris. — Fieldiana Geology,16, 461–469, Chicago, I11., 1970 (1970 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • - Revision of theHolocystites fauna (Diploporita) of North America. — Fieldiana, Geology1,24, 166 pp., Chicago 1971.

  • —— Morphology and function of exothecal pore-structures in cystoids. — Palaeontology,15, 1–28, London 1972 (1972 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Cheirocystella antiqua gen. et sp. nov. from the Lower Ordovician of western Utah, and its bearing on the evolution of the Cheirocrinidae (Rhombifera: Glyptocystitida). — Brigham Young Univ. geol. Stud.,19, 15–63, Provo, Utah, 1972 (1972 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • - British Ordovician cystoids. Pt. 1. — Paleont. Soc. Monogr., 1–64, London 1973. Peck, R. E.: Cretaceous microcrinoids from England. — J. Paleont.,29, 1019–1029, Tulsa, Okla., 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Applinocrinus, a new genus of Cretaceous microcrinoids and its distribution in North America. — J. Paleont.,47, 94–100, Tulsa, Okla., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, R. E. &Watkins, W. T.: Comatulid crinoids from the Lower Cretaceous of Texas. — J. Paleont.,46, 410–414, Tulsa, Okla., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philip, G. M.: Australian fossil crinoids. I. Introduction and terminology for the anal plates of crinoids. — Proc. linn. Soc. New South Wales,88, 259–272, Sydney 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Australian fossil crinoids. — II.Tribrachiocrinus clarkei McCoy. — Proc. linn. Soc. New South Wales,89, 199–202, Sydney 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Plate homologies in inadunate crinoids. — J. Paleont.,39, 146–149, Tulsa, Okla., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, R. J.:Hippocystis sculptus (Barrande, 1887) v českém střednim ordoviku (Cystoidea). — Věstn. Úst. Úst. Geol.40, 303–306, Praha 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Some manners of attachment of crinoids in the Lower Devonian beds at Koněprusy in Bohemia. — Větn. Úst. Úst. Geol.,42, 367–368, Praha 1967 (Czech, and English).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Ramacrinus multiformis gen. et sp. n. (Synbathocrinidae, Crinoidea) in the Devonian of Bohemia. — Větn. Úst. Úst. Geol.,44, 375–377, Praha 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Crinoidea from the Reefton Group (Lower Devonian), New Zealand. — Trans. Roy. Soc. New Zeal., Earth Sci.,8, 41–43, Wellington 1970 (1970 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Family Calceocrinidae Meek & Worthen, 1869 (Crinoidea) in the Silurian and Devonian of Bohemia. — Sborn. Geol. Věd. Paleontologie, Řada P,12, 79–134, Praha 1970 (1970 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Parazitární deformace na kalichu lilijiceScypbocrinites excavatus Schlotheim, 1820, — Čas. Národn. Muz., Odd. přirod.,140, 135–136, Praha 1972. (Czech., with English Summary at p. 136: Parasitary deformations on a cup of the crinoidScypbocrinites excavatus Schlotheim, 1820.)

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Codiacystis bohemica (Barrande, 1887) from the Ordovician of Libya (Cystoidea). — Čas. Mineral. Geol.,18, 73–74, Praha 1973 (1973 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——Elicrinus n. gen. from the Lower Devonian of Bohemia (Crinoidea). — Věstn. Ú st. Úst. Geol.,48, 221–223, Praha 1973 (1973 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsbottom, W. H. C.: British Upper Silurian crinoids from the Ludlovian. — Palaeontology,1, 106–115, London 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • - A monograph on British Ordovician Crinoidea. — Palaeontogr. Soc,114, 37 pp., London 1961.

  • Rasmussen, H. W.: A monograph on the Cretaceous Crinoidea. — Biol. Skr. Dan. Vid. Selsk.,12, 1, 428 pp., København 1961.

  • Rasmussen, H. W.: Cretaceous Crinoidea (Comatulida and Roveacrinida) from England and France. — Bull. geol. Soc. Denmark,20, 285–294, Copenhagen 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Rasmussen, H. W. Lower Tertiary Crinoidea, Asteroidea and Ophiuroidea from northern Europe and Greenland. — Biol. Skr. Dan. Vid. Selsk.,19, 7, 83 pp., København 1972.

  • Regnell, G.: Die Erscheinungsjahre der Arbeiten L. von Buch’s über Cystoideen. — Paläont. Z.,29, 119–125, Stuttgart 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Données concernant le développement ontogénetique des pelmatozoaires du Palé ozoïque (échinodermes). — Bull. Soc. géol. France (7)1, 773–783, année 1959, Paris 1960 (1960 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • — “Intermediate” forms in early Palaeozoic echinoderms. — Internat. geol. Congr, XXI Sess.,22, 71–80, Copenhagen 1960 (1960 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • — The Lower Palaeozoic echinoderm faunas of the British Isles and Balto-Scandia. — Palaeontology,2, 161–179, London 1960 (1960 c).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Functional morphology of some early Palaeozoic echinoderms. — Int. geol. Congr. 24th Sess., Sect.7, 28–32, Montreal 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, I. G.: A color-marked Devonian blastoid. — Oklahoma geol. Notes,21, 153–157, Norman, Okla., 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard, H.: Sur la présence du genreRhombifera dans les calcaires à cystoïdes de l’Ashgill de la Montagne-Noire et d’une nouvelle espèce:Rhombifera matteii. — C. R. Somm. Séances Soc. Géol France, 1967:7, 298–299, Paris 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Renard, I. G. Contribution à la révision des cystoïdes de l’Ashgill de la Montagne Noire. — Univ. Montpellier, Fac. Sci., Thèse, 97 + 11 + 10 pp., Montpellier 1968 zmiméograph.).

  • Rhodes, F. H. T.: Permo-Triassic extinction. — [In:] Harland et al. (Eds.): The fossil record, geol. Soc. London, 57–76, London 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, R. A. &Sprinkle, J.: Ctenocystoidea: New class of primitive echinoderms. — Science,166, 1512–1514, Washington 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roux, M.: Introduction à l’étude des microstructures des tiges de crinoïdes. — Gé obios,3, 79–98, Lyon 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Roux, M. Recherches sur la microstructure des pédoncules de crinoïdes post-paléozoïques. — Trav. Lab. Paléont. Univ. Paris Fac. Sci. d’Orsay, 90 pp., Orsay 1971 (miméograph).

  • -Roux, M. Observations au microscope électronique à balayage de quelques articulations entre les ossicules du squelette des crinoïdes pédonculés actuels (Bathycrinidae et Isocrinina). — Trav. Lab. Paléont. Univ. Paris Fac. Sci. d’ Orsay,11 pp., Orsay 1974 (1974 a) (mimégraph).

  • - Crinoides, pp. 40–41 in Dynamique des populations, Publications collective du Lab. Paléontol. d’Orsay. — CERPAB, Notes et Contrib.,2, Orsay 1974 (1974 b).

  • Ruhrmann, G.: Riff-nahe Sedimentation palaozoischer Krinoiden-Fragmente. — N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh.,138, 56–100, Stuttgart 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schevtschenko, T. V.: Nizhnesiluriskie krinoidei Tsentralnogo Tádzhikistana [Lower Silurian crinoids of central Tadjikistan]. — Akad. Nauk Tadz. SSR, Tadzh. Otdel. Vses. paleont. Obshch., Paleontologiya Tadzhikistana (Ed. Reimann, V. M.), 8–20, Dushane 1964.

  • — Morskie lilii iz verkhnesiluriskikh i nizhnedevonskikh othlozhenii yugo-zapadnogo Tian-Shanya i ikh stratigraficheskae zhachenie [Crinoids from the Upper Silurian and Lower Devonian deposits of southwestern Tien-Shan and their stratigraphical significance]. — Uprav. Geol. Sov. Ministr. Tadzh. SSR, Trudy, Paleont. Strat.,2, 123–188, Dushane 1966 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, R.: Nota preliminar sobre los carpoideos del cambrico medio de Asturias y Léon. — Breviora geologica Asturica,16, 17–22, Oviedo 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Schroeder, R. Carpoideen aus dem Mittelkambrium Nord-Spaniens. — Palaeontographica, A,141, Stuttgart 1973.

  • Schwarzacher, W.: Orientation of crinoids by current action. — J. Sedim. Petrol.,33, 580–586, Menasha, Wise, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sdzuy, K.: Cystoideen aus den Leimitz-Schiefern (Tremadoc). — Senckenbergiana Lethaea,35, 269–276, Frankfurt/Main 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seilacher, A.;Drozdzewski, G. &Haude, R.: Form and function of the stem in a pseudoplanctonic crinoid(Seirocrinus). — Palaeontology,11, 275–282, London 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieverts-Doreck, H.: ÜberAustinocrinus im norddeutschen Senon. Mit einem Beitrag zur Gliederung, Stammengeschichte und Verbreitung der Gattung. — Mitt. geol. Staatsinst. Hamburg,22, 102–118, Hamburg 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Die Verbreitung der CrinoidengattungSaccocoma im schwäbischen Jura. — Jh. Ver. vaterl. Naturk. Württemb.,110, 118–120, Stuttgart 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Bemerkungen über altpaläozoische Crinoiden aus Argentinien. — N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Mh.,1957, 151–156, Stuttgart 1957 (1957 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieverts-Doreck, H.: Über Isocrinus angulatus (Oppel, emend. Fraas). — N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Mh.,1957, 222–225, Stuttgart 1957 (1957 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Kleinreste von Echinodermen aus dem fränkischen Jura. — Naturforsch. Ges. Bamberg, Ber.,36, 15–21, Bamberg 1958 (1958 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Über einige Comatulida aus Jura und Kreide. — N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh.,106, 245–260, Stuttgart 1958, (1958 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Crinoiden aus dem Dachsteinkalk des Stoderzinkens, Ennstal. — Mitt, naturwiss. Ver. Steiermark,91, 165–171, Graz 1961 (1961 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Zur Kenntnis der CrinoidengattungDiscometra (Comatulida, Mariametrina) im Miozän des Wiener Beckens. — Ann. naturhist. Mus. Wien,64, 105–126, Wien 1961 (1961 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Über eine neue Form von Tubusplatten devonischer Crinoiden. — Notizbl. hess. L.-Amt. Bodenforsch. Wiesbaden,90, 106–116, Wiesbaden 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Über Mißbildungen beiCupressocrinus elongatus aus dem Mitteldevon der Eifel. — Decheniana,115, 239–244, Bonn 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Zur Kenntnis vonBalanocrinus württembergicus aus dem schwäbischen Opalinuston (Dogger α). — Jh. Ver. vaterl. Naturk. Württ.118/119, 147–166, Stuttgart 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigler, J. P.;Whithe, D. &Kesling, R. V.:Logocrinus brandoni, a new inadunate crinoid from the Middle Devonian Silica Shale of Ohio. — Contrib. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich.,23, 213–220, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sizova, E. W.: Znachenie iskoremikh steblei morskikh lilii dlia stratigrafii devona i karbona Tsentralnogo Kazakhstana [Significance of fossil crinoid stems for the Devonian and Carboniferous stratigraphy of central Kazakhstan]. — Trudy Vses. Nauchno-Issled. Geol. Inst.,33, 51–65, Leningrad 1960 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreng, W. P. &Parks, J. M.: Evolution in basal plates of monocyclic camerate crinoids. — J. Paleont.,27, 585–595, Tulsa, Okla., 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprinkle, J.: Morphology and evolution of blastozoan echinoderms. — Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard Univ., spec. PubL, 283 pp., Cambridge, Mass. 1973 (1973 a).

  • — New occurrence of the Ordovician eocrinoidLingulocystis from Bolivia, South America. — J. Paleont.,47, 1113–1116, Tulsa, Okla., 1973 (1973 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • —Tripatocrinus, a new hybrocrinid crinoid based on disarticulated plates from the Antelope Valley Limestone of Nevada and California. — J. Paleont.,47, 861–882, Tulsa, Okla., 1973 (1973 c).

    Google Scholar 

  • — New rhombiferan cystoids from the Middle Ordovician of Nevada. — J. Paleont.,48, 1174–1200, Tulsa, Okla., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprinkle, J. &Gutschick, R. C.:Costatoblastus, a channel fill blastoid from the Sappington Formation of Montana. — J. Paleont.,41, 385–402, Tulsa, Okla., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strimple, H. L.: Late Desmoinesian crinoids. — Oklahoma geol. Surv., Bull.,93, 189 pp., Norman, Okla., 1961.

  • - Crinoids from the Oologah formation. — Okl. geol. Surv. Circ,60, 75 pp., Norman, Okla., 1962.

  • — Crinoids of the Hunton Group. — Okla. geol. Surv., Bull.,100, 1–169, Norman, Okla., 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • — A unique crinoid from the Upper Permian. — Oklahoma geol. Notes,26, 80–84, Norman, Okla., 1966 (1966 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • — New species of cromyocrinids from Oklahoma and Arkansas. — Oklahoma geol. Notes,26, 3–12, Norman, Okla., 1966 (1966 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • — New lecanocrinid from Pennsylvanian of Oklahoma, — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,42, 1–7 (including: Addendum — occurrence ofCibolocrinm seminolensis Strimple, n. sp., in southern Kansas, by R. C. Moore), Lawrence, Kans., 1969 (1969 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Pennsylvanian crinoids from Ohio and Oklahoma. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.42, 11–17, Lawrence, Kans., 1969 (1969 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Upper Pennsylvanian anobasicrinid from New Mexico. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,42, 8–10, Lawrence, Kans., 1969 (1969 c).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Echinoderm zonules in the Devonian of Iowa. — Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci.,77, 249–256, Des Moines, Iowa, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • — A Permian crinoid from Coahuila, Mexico. — J. Paleont.,45, 1040–1042, Tulsa, Okla., 1971 (1971a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —Agnostocrinus from the Upper Permian of Texas. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,56, 31–32, Lawrence, Kans., 1971 (1971 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Crinoids from the Vinland Shale (Virgilian) of Kansas. — J. Paleont.,45, 998–1000, Tulsa, Okla., 1971 (1971 c).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strimple, H. L.: The occurrence ofHydriocrinus in Oklahoma and Russia. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,56, 16–18, Lawrence, Kans., 1971 (1971 d).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Concerning OrdovicianNeoarcheocrinus. — J. Paleont.,46, 450–451, Tulsa, Okla., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • —Aenigmocrinus, a new Chesteran inadunate crinoid. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,66, 15–18, Lawrence, Kans., 1973 (1973 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Articulate crinoid(Isocrinus) from Jurassic rocks of Prince Patrick Island, Canada, — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,66, 24–26, Lawrence, Kans., 1973 (1973 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Notes on Mississippian Ampelocrinidae. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,66, 21–24, Lawrence, Kans., 1973 (1973 c).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Tegminal structure of some inadunate crinoids. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,66, 27–32, Lawrence, Kans., 1973 (1973 d).

    Google Scholar 

  • — The inadunate crinoid genusHeliosocrinus. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,66, 18–21, Lawrence, Kans., 1973 (1973 e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strimple, H. L.;Allison, R. C. &Kline, G. L.: Pennsylvanian crinoids from Alaska. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,56, 9–15, Lawrence, Kans., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strimple, H. L. &Boardman II,D. R.: Notes onStenopecrinus andPerimestocrinus. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,56, 27–30, Lawrence, Kans., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strimple, H. L. &Cocke, J. M.: Tabulate corals and echinoderms from the Pennsylvanian Winterset Limestone, Hogshooter Formation, northeastern Oklahoma. — Bull. Amer. Paleontol.,64, (279), 139–167, Ithaca, N. Y., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strimple, H. L. &Horowitz, A.: A new Mississippian ampelocrinid. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,56, 23–27, Lawrence, Kans., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strimple, H. L. &Levorson, C. O.: Two Upper Devonian crinoids. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,42, 17–20, Lawrence, Kans., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • — New flexible crinoids from the Upper Devonian crinoids of north central Iowa. — Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci.,78, 9–11, Des Moines, Iowa, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strimple, H. L. &McGinnis, M. R.: New crinoid from the Gilmore City Formation, Lower Mississippian of Iowa. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,42, 21–22, Lawrence, Kans., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • — A new platycrinitid from Gilmore City, Iowa. — Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci.,76, 236–266, Des Moines, Iowa, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • — A new camerate crinoid from the Al Rose Formation, Lower Ordovician of California. — J. Paleont.,46, 72–74, Tulsa, Okla., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strimple, H. L. &Miller, J. F.: Pennsylvanian crinoids from the Pinkerton Trail Limestone, Molas Lake, Colorado. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,56, 35–40, Lawrence, Kans., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strimple, H. L. &Moore, R. C.: Crinoids of the Francis Shale (Missourian) of Oklahoma. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,55, 1–20, Lawrence, Kans., 1971, (1971 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Crinoids of the Lasalle Limestone (Pennsylvanian) of Illinois. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,55, (Echinodermata, 11), 1–48, Lawrence, Kans., 1971 (1971 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • — A crinoid crown from d’Orbigny’s famous fossil locality at Yaurichampi, Bolivia. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,56, 33–35, Lawrence, Kans., 1971 (1971 c)

    Google Scholar 

  • —The family Diphuicrinidae. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,56, 2–9, Lawrence, Kans., 1971 (1971 d).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Notes onDelocrinus andEndelocrinus from the Lane Shale (Missourian) of Kansas City. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,56, 19–22, Lawrence, Kans., 1971 (1971 e).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Middle Pennsylvanian crinoids from central Colorado. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,66, 8–15, Lawrence, Kans., 1973 (1973 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Notes on the inadunate crinoid genusPhanocrinus. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,66, 2–7, Lawrence, Kans., 1973 (1973 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Tegmen ofCamptocrinus. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,66, 33–38, Lawrence, Kans., 1973 (1973 c).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strimple, H. L. &Nassichuk, W. W.: Pennsylvanian crinoids from Ellesmere Island, Arctic Canada. — J. Paleont.,48, 1149–1155, Tulsa, Okla., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strimple, H. L. &Priest, A.: New erisocrinid from Nebraska. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,42, 23–26, Lawrence, Kans., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strimple, H. L. &Watkins, W. T.: New Ordovician echinoderms. — J. Wash. Acad. Sci.45, 347–355, Washington, D. C, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Carboniferous crinoids of Texas with stratigraphic implications. — Palaeontographica Amer.,6, 40, 137–275, Ithaca, New York 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stukalina, G. A.: K metodike izuchenija i sboram iskopaemich ostatkov steley morskikh lilii [Methods of studying and collecting fossil remains of crinoid stems], — Trudy Vses. Nauchno-Issled. geol. Inst., N. S.,111, 31–35, Leningrad 1964 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stukalina, G. A. Morskie lilii karaespinskogo horisonta [Crinoids from the Karaespinsk horizon]. — [In:] Stratigrafia inzhnepaleozoiskikh i siluriyskikh otlozheniy tsentralnogo Kazakhstana.

  • Stukalina, G. A. Gosud. Geol. Kom. SSSR. Tsentral.-Kazakh. Geol. Upravl., Izd. »Nedra«, Leningrad 1965 (1965 a) (Russian).

  • — Novie vidyHexacrinites(?) tsentralnogo Kazakhstana [A new species ofHexacrinitesQ) from central Kazakhstan]. — Ezheg. Vses. Paleont. Obshch.,17, 188–193, Leningrad 1965 (1965 b) (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • — O taksonomičeskom snačenii stélej drevnich morskich lilii [On the taxonomic importance of the stems of early crinoids]. — Trudy VSEGEI,115, 210–217, Leningrad 1965 (1965 c) (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • — O printisipakh klassifikatsii steblei drevnikh morskikh lilii [On the principles of classification of stems of early crinoids]. — Paleont. Zh.,1966, 94–102, Moskva 1966 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • — O taksonomickeskikh priznakakh segmehtirovannykh steblei morskikh lilii [On taxonomic features of segmented stems of crinoids]. — Biostrat. Sborn., Vses. Nauchno-Issled. geol. Inst. Trudy, N. S.,192, 3, 200–206, Leningrad 1967 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • -Stukalina, G. A. K sistematike gruppi Pentamerata (Crinoidea). — Akad. Nauk. SSSR, Paleont. Zh., 1968, 81–91, Moskva 1968 (Russian translation in Paleont. J. 1968, 73–82. Systematics of the Pentamerata) (1968 a).

  • —K sistematike semejstva Decacrinidae [Systematics of the family Decacrinidae]. — Ezheg. Vses. paleont. Obshch.,18, 250–267, Leningrad 1968 (1968 b) (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • -Stukalina, G. A. Stratigraphic significance of the stems of crinoids in solving the Siluro-Devonian boundary problem — [In:] Oswald, D. H. (Ed.): International symposium on the Devonian system,2, 893–896, Calgary, Alberta (Soc. Petrol. Geol.), 1968 (1968 c).

  • — Pozdneoordovikskie morskie lilii centralnogo Kazachstana [Late Ordovician crinoids from central Kazakhstan]. — Trudy VSEGEI, Biostrat. Sbornik, N. S.,130, 202–216, Leningrad 1969 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Morskie lilii pogranichnikh sloevsilura i devona Kazakhstana v svayzi s problemoy granits etikh sistem. — Otdel. Geol. Geofiz. Geokhem. SSSR, VSEGEI, Granitsa silura i devona i biostratigrafiya silura, Trudi III mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma,1, 192–201, Leningrad (Izdat »Nauka«) 1971 (Russian, with English Summary at p. 201: Crinoids of Silurian and Devonian boundary beds of Kazakhstan and the problem of the boundary between these systems).

    Google Scholar 

  • -Stukalina, G. A. Pozdnepaleozojskie morskii lilii Zabajkalja i Mongolii [Late Palaeozoic crinoids from Transbaikal and Mongolia]. — Geogr. Oshchestvo SSSR, Zapiskii Zabajkalsk. Fil., Vip. 94 (Stratigrafia i paleontologia osadochnikh geologicheskikh formatsii Zabajkalja), 16– 55, Chita 1973 (Russian).

  • Stukalina, G. A. &Tujutjan, Yu. A.: Novie ordovikskie morskie lilii Kazachstana [New Ordovician crinoids from Kazakhstan]. — Izv. Akad. Nauk. Kazakh. SSR, Ser. Geol.,1967, 72–76, Alma Ata 1967 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Novie predstaviteli gruppi Pentamerata iz ordoviku Kazakstana [New representatives of the group Pentamerata in the Ordovician of Kazakhstan]. — Izv. Akad. Nauk. Kazakh. SSR, Ser. Geol.,1970, 57–65, Alma Ata 1970 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Termier, H. &Termier, G.: Les Stromatocystitoïdes et leur descendance. Essai sur '’é volution des premiers échinodermes. — Géobios,2, 131–156, Lyon 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — Un échinoderme encroûtant de l’Ashgill (Ordovicien supérieur) du Tafilalt (sud Marocain):Herpetocystis destombesi nov. gen. nov. sp. — C. R. Hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci.,271 D, 1260–1263, Paris 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Les échinodermes Cincta du Cambrien de la Montagne Noire (France). — Géobios,6, 243–266, Lyon 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ubaghs, G.:Ammonicrinm Springer. Crinoidea Flexibilia du Dévonien moyen d’Allemagne. — Senckenbergiana,33, 203–226, Frankfurt am Main 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Classe des crinoïdes. — [In:] Piveteau, J. (Ed.): Traité de Palé ontologie,3, 658–773, Paris (Masson & Cie), 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Recherches sur les crinoïdes Camerata du Silurien de Gotland (Suède). Introduction générale et partie I: Morphologie et Paléobiologie deBarrandeocrinus sceptrum Angelin. — Ark. Zool., Ser. 2,9, 515–550, Stockholm 1956 (1956 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Recherches sur les crinoïdes Camerata du Silurien de Gotland (Suède). II: Morphologie et position systé matique dePolypeltes granulatm Angelin. — Ark. Zool., Ser. 2,9, 551–572, Stockholm 1956 (1956 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubaghs, G.: Morphologie et position systématique deMethabocrinus erraticus Jaekel (Crinoidea Camerata). — Paläont. Z.,32, 52–62, Stuttgart 1958 (1958 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Recherches sur les crinoïdes Camerata du Silurian de Gotland (Suède). III. Melocrinicae. Avge des remarques sur l’évolution des Melocrinidae. — Ark. Zool., Ser. 2,11, 259–306, Stockholm 1958 (1958 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Sur la nature de l’organe appelé tige ou pédoncule chez les carpoïdes Cornuta et Mitrata. — C. R. Acad. Sci.,253, 2738–2740, Paris 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Ubaghs, G. General characters of Echinodermata. — Treatise Invert. Paleont. S, S 3-S 60, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, Kans., 1967 (1967 a).

  • — Le genreCeratocystis Jaekel (Echinodermata, Stylophora). — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,22, 1–16, Lawrence, Kans., 1967 (1967 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • -Ubaghs, G. Eocrinoidea. — Treatise Invert. Paleont. S, S 455-S 495, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence Kans., 1967 (1967 c).

  • - Crinoidea. [In:] Moore, R. C. et al.: Developments, trends, and outlooks in paleontology, — J. Paleont.,42, 1371, Tulsa, Okla., 1968.

  • — General characteristics of the echinoderms. — Chem. Zoology,3, 3–45, New York (Academic Press. Inc.) 1969 (1969 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • - Les échinodermes carpoïdes de l’Ordovicien inférieur de la Montagne Noire (France). — Centre National de la Récherche Scientifique. Cahiers de Paléontologie, 112 pp., Paris 1969 (1969 b).

  • —Aethocrinus moorei Ubaghs, n. gen., n. sp., le plus ancien crinoide dicyclique connu. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,38, 1–25, Lawrence, Kans., 1969 (1969 c).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Diversité et spécialisation des plus anciens échinodermes que l’on connaise. — Biol. Reviews,46, 157–200, Cambridge 1971 (1971 a).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — Un crinoïde énigmatique Ordovicien:Perittocrinus Jaekel. — N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh.,137, 305–336, Stuttgart 1971 (1971 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Le genreBalantiocystis Chauvel (Echinodermata, Eocrinoidea) dans l’Ordovicien inférieur de la Montagne Noire (France). — Ann. Paléont., Invertébrés,58, 1–27, Paris 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubaghs, G. &Bouček, B.: Sur la présence du genreTiaracrinus Schultze (Crinoidea) dans le Devonien inférieur de Moravie(Tiaracrinus moravicus n. sp.). — Sborn. Úst. Úst. Geol.,28, Odd Paleont., 41–52, Praha 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubaghs, G. &Caster, K. E.: Homalozoans. — Treatise Invert. Paleont. S, S 495-S 627, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, Kans., 1967.

  • VanSant, J. F. &Lane, N. G.: Crawfordville crinoid fauna of Indiana. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr., Echinodermata,7, 1–136, Lawrence, Kans., 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verniory, R.: Répartition stratigraphique et géographique deSaccocoma Agassiz entre l’Oberland Bernois et la Provence. — Arch. Sci. Soc. Phys. Hist. Nat. Genève,8, 97–101, Genève 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyalov, O. S.: K voprosy o klassifikatsii strebelkov morskikh liliy [The problem of the classification of crinoid columnals]. — Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,89, 1087–1090, Moskva 1953 (1953 a) (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • -Vyalov, O. S. O klassifikatsii stebelkov morskikh liliy [On the classification of crinoid columnals]. — Trudy Lvovsk. Geol. Ob-va paleont. Ser.,2, Lvov 1953 (1953 b) (Russian; not seen).

  • Wanner, J.: Die Analstruktur vonAmmonicrinus Springer nebst Bemerkungen über Aberranzen und Anomalien bei Krinoiden. — N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Mh., 1954, 231–236, Stuttgart 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warn, J. M.: The Ordovician crinoidHeterocrine, with reference to brachial variability inH. tenuis. — J. Paleont.,47, 10–18, Tulsa, Okla., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Presumed myzostomid infestation of an Ordovician crinoid. — J. Paleont.,48, 506–513, Tulsa, Okla., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webby, B. D.: A Middle Devonian inadunate crinoid from west Somerset, England. — Palaeontology,4, 538–541, London 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • —Quantoxocrinus, a new Devonian inadunate crinoid from west Somerset. — Palaeontology,8, 11–15, London 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • —Astrocystites distans, sp. nov., an edrioblastoid from the Ordovician of Eastern Australia. — Palaeontology,11, 513–525, London 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G. D.: Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids 1942–1968. — Geol. Soc. Amer., Mem.,137, xl + 341 pp., Boulder, Col., 1973.

  • — Crinoid pluricolumnal noditaxis patterns. — J. Paleont.,48, 1283–1288, Tulsa, Okla., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G. D. &Lane, N. G.: Additional Permian crinoids from southern Nevada. — Univ. Kansas paleont. Contr.,27, 1–32, Lawrence, Kans., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G. D. &Lane, N. G.: Carboniferous echinoderms from the southwestern United States. — J. Paleont.,44, 276–296, Tulsa, Okla., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, K. W.: New fossils from the Middle Ordovician Platteville Formation of Southwest Wisconsin. — J. Paleont.,48, 79–83, Tulsa, Okla., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyer, D.:Triacrinus Münster 1839 (Crinoidea) aus derWocklumeria-Stufe des thüringschen Oberdevons. — Geologie,14, 969–981, Berlin 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfart, R.: Die Fauna (Brachiopoda, Mollusca, Trilobita) aus dem Unter-Kambrium von Kerman, Südost-Iran. — Geol. Jb. (Bundesanst. Bodenforsch., Geol. Landesämt. Bundesrepubl. Deutschland), Reihe B,8, 5–70, Hannover 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J.: A monograph on the British Carboniferous Crinoidea. I–II, i–xxix + 1–347, Palaeontogr. Soc, London 1950-1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakovlev, N. N.: O nakhodke lobolitov v SSSR i o biologicheskom znachnenii ikh [On finds of loboliths in USSR and on their biologic significance]. — Ezhegod. Vses. paleont. Ob.,14, 18–31, Moskva-Leningrad 1953. (Reprinted [in:] Yakovlev, N. N.: Organism i sreda. — Moskva-Leningrad 1956; 2nd ed. 1964) (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • — O napravlenii izmeneniya bazica chashechki morskikh liliy i o prichinakh etogo izmeneniya [On the tendency for modification in the basals of crinoid calyces and the reasons for it]. — Dokl. Akad. NaukSSSR,99, 1087–1090, Moskva 1954 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • — K peresmotru kharakteristiki rodaRistnacrinus Öpik [A revision of the diagnostic features ofRistnacrinus Öpik]. — Ezhegod. Vses. paleont. Ob.,15, 155–157, MoskvaLeningrad 1956 (1956 a) (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Morskie lilii Voronezhskogo devona [Crinoids from the Devonian of Voronezh]. — Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Biol,1956, 91–93, Moskva-Leningrad 1956 (1956 b) (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • - Dve linii razvitiya morskikh lilii kromiokrinid v svyazi s ikh geograficheskim rasprostraneniem [Two lines of development of cromyocrinid crinoids in connexion with their geographical dissemination]. — Trudy I Sess. Vses. paleont. Ob., 11–14, Moskva 1957 (Russian).

  • — Morskie lilii iz nizhnego karbona Donbassa. — Geol. Sborn. Lvovsk. geol. Ob.,1961, 417–420, Lvov 1961 (Russian, with English Summary at p. 420: Sea lilies from the Lower Carbonic of the Donbas).

    Google Scholar 

  • - Organism i sreda. Stati po paleoekologii bespozvonochnykh 1913–1960 gg [Organisms and environment. Writings of palaeoecology of invertebrates 1913–1960], sec. ed., 148 pp. — Akad. Nauk SSSR, paleont. Inst., Moskva-Leningrad 1964 (Russian).

  • — [Triassic crinoids of the Far East]. — Ezhegod. Vses. paleont. Ob.,17, 265–267, Moskva-Leningrad 1965 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakovlev, N. N. &Ivanov, A. P.: Morskie lilii i blastoidei kamennougolnikh i permskikh otlozheny SSSR [Crinoids and Blastoids from the Carboniferous and Permian of the USSR]. — Trudy Vses. Inst. Geol. Nauk, N. S.,11, 5–142, Moskva 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeltysheva, R. S.: Stebli morskikh lily i ikh klassifikatsya [Crinoid stems and their classification]. — Vestn. Leningr. Univ., Ser. Geol. Geogr.,12, 40–46, Leningrad 1956 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Ordovikskie i siluriyskie krinoidei Sibirskoy platformi [Ordovician and Silurian crinoids of the Siberian platform]. — Trudy VSEGEI, N. S.,3, 1–39, Leningrad 1959 (1959 a) (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Printsipi klassifikatsii, metodika izuchenya i stratigraficheskoe znachenie stebleya morskikh lily [Principles of classification and methods of study for stratigraphic use of crinoid stems]. — Ezheg. Vses. paleont. Obshch., Trudy,2, 230–235, Leningrad 1959 (1959 b) (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Stebli ordoviskikh morskikh lily Pribaltiki (nizhniy ordovik) [Ordovician crinoid stems from the Baltic provinces (Lower Ordovician)]. — Sborn. Vopr. Paleont.,4, 59–84, Leningrad 1964 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • — Stebli ordoviskikh morsikh lily Pribaltiki (sredniy ordovik) [Ordovician crinoid stems from the Baltic provinces (Middle Ordovician)]. — Sborn. Vopr. Paleont.,5, 53–70, Leningrad 1965 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeltysheva, R. S. &Schevtschenko, T. V.: Stebli morksikh lily iz kamennougolnikh otlozheny Tyan-Shanya i Darvaza [Crinoid stems from Carboniferous beds in Tien-Shan and Darvaz]. — Izv. Otd. Geol.-Khim. Tekhn. Nauk AN Tadzhikskoy SSR,1, 119–125, Stalinabad and Dutsanbe 1960 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Žitt, J.:Sclerocrinus Jaekel 1891 andProholopus Jaekel, 1907 (Crinoidea, Cyrtocrinida) from the Lower Cretaceous of Štramberk (Czechoslovakia). — Sborn. Geol. Věd, Palaeont.,16, 7–34, Praha 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Historical Geology and Palaeontology, Lunds Universitet, Sölvegatan 13, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden

    Gerhard Regnéix

Authors
  1. Gerhard Regnéix
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Regnéix, G. Review of Recent Research on “Pelmatozoans”. Paläont. Z. 49, 530–564 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02986560

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02986560

Keywords

Search

Navigation