Skip to main content
Log in

More ways to tile with only one shape polygon

  • Article
  • The Hexagonal Parquet Tiling: K-Isohedral Monotiles with Arbitrarily Large K
  • Published:
The Mathematical Intelligencer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 September 2007

Conclusion

I have exhibited several types of monotiles with matching rules that force the construction of a hexagonal parquet. The isohedral number of the resulting tiling can be made as large as desired by increasing the aspect ratio of the monotile. Aside from illustrating some elegant peculiarities of the hexagonal parquet tiling, the constructions demonstrate three points.

  1. 1.

    Monotiles with arbitrarily large isohedral number do exist;

  2. 2.

    The additional topological possibilities afforded in 3D allow construction of a simply connected monotile with a rule enforced by shape only, which is impossible for the hexagonal parquet in 2D;

  3. 3.

    The precise statement of the tiling problem matters— whether color matching rules are allowed; whether multiply connected shapes are allowed; whether spacefilling is required as opposed to just maximum density. So what about the quest for thek = ∞ monotile? Schmitt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Penrose, “Pentaplexity,”Math. Intelligencer 2 (1979), 32–37.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Gardner, “Extraordinary nonperiodic tiling that enriches the theory of tiles,”Sci. Am. 236 (1977), 110–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Berger, “The undecidability of the Domino problem,”Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 66 (1966), 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Grünbaum and G. C. Shephard,Tilings and Patterns, Freeman, New York (1987).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Goodman-Strauss, “A strongly aperiodic set of tiles in the hyperbolic plane,”Inventiones Mathematicae 159 (2005), 119–132.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. J. S. Myers, “Polyomino tiling,” http://www.srcf.ucam.org/jsm28/ tiling/ (2005).

  7. L. Danzer, “A family of 3D-spacefillers not permitting any periodic or quasiperiodic tiling,” inAperiodic ’94, edited by G. Chapuis World Scientific, Singapore (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Baake and D. Frettloh, “SCD patterns have singular diffraction,”J. Math. Phys. 46 033510 (2005).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Radin, “Aperiodic tilings in higher dimensions,”Proc. American Mathematical Soc. 123(1995), 3543–3548.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Gummelt, “Penrose tilings as coverings of congruent decagons,”Geometriae Dedicata 62 (1996), 1–17.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. P. J. Steinhardt and H.-C. Jeong, “A simpler approach to Penrose tiling with implications for quasicrystal formation,”Nature 382, 431–433 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. T. C. Hales, “A proof of the Kepler conjecture,”Ann. of Math. 162 (2005), 1065–1185.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Torquato and F. H. Stillinger, “New conjectural lower bounds on the optimal density of sphere packings,” to appear,Experimental Mathematics 15, Issue 3 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua E. S. Socolar.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02986167.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Socolar, J.E.S. More ways to tile with only one shape polygon. The Mathematical Intelligencer 29, 33–38 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02986203

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02986203

Keywords

Navigation