Skip to main content

A clash of mathematical titans in Austin: Harry S. Vandiver and Robert Lee Moore (1924–1974)

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Anderson, Richard D. and Ben Fitzpatrick (2000), “An interview with Edwin Moise,”Topological Commentary 5 (http://at.yorku.ca/t/o/p/c/88.htm).

  2. Corry, Leo (2004),Modern Algebra and the Rise of Mathematical Structures, Boston and Basel, Birkhäuser.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. —— (2007), “Fermat comes to America: Harry Schultz Vandiver and FLT (1914-1963),”Mathematical Intelligencer 29 no. 3 30–40.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. —(2007a), “FLT Meets SWAC: Vandiver, the Lehmers, Computers and Number Theory,”IEEE Annals of History of Computing (Forthcoming).

  5. Fenster, Delia D. (1999), “Why Dickson Left Quadratic Reciprocity out of His History of the Theory of Numbers,”Am. Math. Monthly 106 (7), 618–629.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenwood, Robert E. (1983), “History of the Various Departments of Mathematics at the University of Texas at Austin: 1883–1983.” unpublished manuscript in the Greenwood archive, Archives of American Mathematics, Center for American History, The University of Texas at Austin.

  7. —(1988), “The Benedict and Porter Years, 1903–1937,” unpublished oral interview (March 9, 1988) (Oral History Project, The Legacy of R. L. Moore, Archives of American Mathematics, Center for American History, The University of Texas at Austin).

  8. Greenwood, Robert E.,et al. (1973), “In Memoriam. Harry Schultz Vandiver, 1882-1973,” Memorial Resolution, Documents and Minutes of the General Faculty, The University of Texas at Austin, 1974, 10926–10940.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis, Albert C. (1989), “The Building of the University of Texas Mathematics Faculty, 1883-1938,” in Peter Duren (ed.)A Century of Mathematics in America—Part III, Providence, RI, AMS, pp. 205–239.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moore, Robert Lee (1932),Foundations of Point Set Theory, Providence, Rl, AMS (revised edition, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  11. McShane, Edward J. (1957), “Maintaining Communication,”Am. Math. Monthly 64 (5), 309–317.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Parker, John (2005),R. L. Moore. Mathematician & Teacher, Washington, DC, Mathematical Association of America.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Raimi, Ralph (2005), “Annotated Chronology of the New Math,” unpublished manuscript available at the site Work in Progress, Concerning the History of the so-called New Math, of the Period 1952–1975 (http://www.math.rochester.edu/people/faculty/rarm/the_new_math.html).

  14. Reid, Constance (1993),The Search for E. T. Bell, Also Known as John Taine, Washington, DC, Mathematical Association of America.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Traylor, D. R.,Creative Teaching: The Heritage of Ft. L Moore, University of Houston, 1972.

  16. Usiskin, Zalman (1999), “The Stages of Change” (1999 LSC PI Meeting Keynote Address), downloaded from http://lsc-net.terc.edu/do.cfm/conference_material/6857/show/use_set-oth_pres.

  17. Vandiver, Harry Schultz (1924), “Review of Volumes II and III of Dickson’sHistory of the Theory of NumbersBull. AMS 39, 65–70.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. —— (1960), “On the desirability of publishing classified bibliographies of the mathematics literature,”Am. Math. Monthly 67(1), 47–50.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. —— (1961) “On developments in an arithmetic theory of the Bernoulli and allied numbers,”Scripta Mathematica 25, 273–303.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. —— (1963), “Some aspects of the Fermat problem (fourth paper),”Proc. NAS 49, 601–608.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. —(unpublished 1), “On the relation between academic teaching and academic research and the most effective working conditions for each,” unpublished manuscript (HSV), 12 pp.

  22. —(unpublished 2), “On the training in universities which is desirable for potential teachers of mathematics in elementary schools,” unpublished manuscript (HSV), 5 pp.

  23. Wall, Hubert (1963),Creative Mathematics, Austin, UT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wilder, R. L. (1959), “Axiomatics and the development of creative talent,” in L. Henkin, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski (eds),The Axiomatic Method with Special Reference to Geometry and Physics, Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp. 474–488.

  25. Zitarelli, David E. and Marion D. Cohen (2004), “The Origin and Early Impact of the Moore Method,”Am. Math. Monthly 111 (6), 465–487.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corry, L. A clash of mathematical titans in Austin: Harry S. Vandiver and Robert Lee Moore (1924–1974). The Mathematical Intelligencer 29, 62–74 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02986177

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mathematical Intelligencer
  • Cyclotomic Field
  • Didactical Method
  • Expository Paper
  • Departmental Life