Journal of Genetics

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 7–24 | Cite as

Gynogenesis in the teleost,Mollienesia formosa (Girard), with a discussion of the detection of parthenogenesis in vertebrates by tissue transplantation

  • Klaus D. Kallman
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Balfour-Lynne, S. (1956). Parthenogenesis in human beings.Lancet,270, 1071–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beatty, R. A. (1957). Parthenogenesis and polyploidy in mammalian development. Cambridge Monograph in Experimental Biology, No. 7.Google Scholar
  3. Belar, K. (1923). Ueber den Chromosomenzyklus von parthenogenetischen Erdnematoden.Biol. Zbl,43, 513–518.Google Scholar
  4. Belar, K. (1924). Die Cytologie der Merospermie bei freilebenden Rhabditis-Arten.Z. Zell.-u. Gewebelehre,1, 1–21.Google Scholar
  5. Bellamy, A. W. andQueal, M. L. (1951). Heterosomal inheritance and sex determination inPlatypoecilus maculatus.Genetics,36, 93–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Benazzi-Lentati, G. ePiegaja, Maria I. (1953). Sulle eccezioni alla reproduzione pseudogamica in biotipi diDugesia benazzi (Tricladida paludicola).Caryologia,5, 192–216.Google Scholar
  7. Billingham, R. E. (1959). Reactions of grafts against their hosts.Science,130, 947–953.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Breider, H. (1942). ZW—Maennchen und WW—Weibchen beiPlatypoecilus maculatus.Biol. Zbl.,62, 187–195.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, Eugenie (1959). Functional hermaphroditism and self-fertilization in a serranid fish.Science,129, 215–216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Darevsky, I. S. (1958). Natural parthenogenesis in certain subspecies ofLacerta saxicola Eversmann.Doklady Akademii Nauk,122, 730–732.Google Scholar
  11. Fankhauser, G. (1945). The effects of changes in chromosome number on amphibian development.Quart. Rev. Biol.,20, 20–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fleischmann, W. andKann, Susanne (1937). Wirkung von Hypophysenhormonen auf den Farbwechsel einiger Adriafische.Z. vergl. Physiol.,25, 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gordon, M. (1947). Genetics ofPlatypoecilus maculatus. IV. The sex determining mechanism in two wild populations of the Mexican platyfish.Genetics,32, 8–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gordon, M. andAronowitz, Olga (1951). Sex determination inPlatypoecilus maculatus. II. History of a male platyfish that sired all-female broods.Zoologica,36, 147–153.Google Scholar
  15. Goss, R. J. andStagg, Martha W. (1957). The regeneration of fin rays inFundulus heteroclitus.J. Exp. Zool.,136, 487–508.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Goss, R. J. (1959). Experiments on the morphogenesis of regenerating fins inFundulus heteroclitus. The Bulletin, Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory, page 47.Google Scholar
  17. Haldane, J. B. S. (1958). Parthenogenesis.Triangle (The Sandoz Journal of Medical Science),3, 142–149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Haldane, J. B. S. (1959). Parthenogenese.Naturw. Rdsch.,12, 453–458.Google Scholar
  19. Haney, Bette M. andOlsen, M. W. (1958). Parthenogenesis in premature and newly laid turkey eggs.J. Exp. Zool.,139, 469–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haskins, C. P., Haskins, Edna F. andHewitt, R. E. (1960). Pseudogamy as an evolutionary factor in the poeciliid fishMollienisia formosa.Evolution.14, 473–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hertwig, Paula (1920). Abweichende Form der Parthenogenese bei einer Mutation vonRhabditis pellio.Arch. mikr. Anat.,94, 303–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hubbs, C. L. (1955). Hybridization between fish species in nature.Systematic Zool.,4, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hubbs, C. L. andHubbs, Laura C. (1932). Apparent parthenogenesis in nature, in a form of fish of hybrid origin.Science,76, 628–630.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hubbs, C. L. andHubbs, Laura C. (1946). Experimental breeding of the Amazon molly.Aqua. Jour.,17, 4–6.Google Scholar
  25. Hubbs, C., Drewry, G. E. andWarburton, Barbara (1959). Occurrence and morphology of a phenotypic male of a gynogenetic fish.Science,129, 1227–1229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kallman, K. D. andGordon, M. (1957). Transplantation of fins in xiphophorin fishes.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.,71, 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kallman, K. D. andGordon, M. (1958). Genetics of fin transplantation in xiphophorin fishes.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.,73, 599–610.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kallman, K. D. (1960). Dosage and additive effects of histocompatibility genes in the teleostXiphophorus maculatus.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.,87, 10–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kasansky, W. J. (1935). Parthenogenetisch entwickelte junge Karpfen (Cyprinus carpio L.).Zool. Anz.,110, 191–193.Google Scholar
  30. Krueger, Eva (1913). Fortpflanzung und Keimzellenbildung vonRhabditis aberrans nov. spec.Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool.,105, 87–124.Google Scholar
  31. Lepori, N. G. (1949). Ricerche sulla ovogenesi e sulla fecondazione nella planariaPolycelis nigra Ehrenberg con particolare riguardo all’ufficio del nucleo spermatico.Caryologia,1, 280–295.Google Scholar
  32. Lepori, N. G. (1950). Il ciclo chromosomico, con poliploidia, endomitosi e ginogenesi, in popolazioni Italiane diPolycelis nigra Ehrenberg.Caryologia,2, 201–324.Google Scholar
  33. Lieder, U. (1955). Maennchenmangel und natuerliche Parthenogenese bei der SilberkarauscheCarassius auratus gibelio (Vertebrata, Pisces).Naturwiss.,42, 590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Medawar, P. B. (1958). The Croonian lecture. The homograft reaction.Proc. Rev. Soc. B.149 145–166.Google Scholar
  35. Meyer, H. (1938). Investigations concerning the reproductive behavior ofMollienisia “formosa”.J. Genet.,36, 327–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moore, P. B., Woodroffe, G. E. andSanderson, Ann R. (1956). Polymorphism and parthenogenesis in a ptinid beetle.Nature,177, 847–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nikolukin, N. L. (1946). On purely matroclinous progeny resulting from crosses between certain Teleostean fishes.C. R. Acad Sci. URSS.,52, 369–372.Google Scholar
  38. Olsen, M. W. (1956). Fowl pox vaccine associated with parthenogenesis in chicken and turkey eggs.Science,124, 1078–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Olsen, M. W. (1959). Fatherless turkey.J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.,134, 8.Google Scholar
  40. Olsen, M. W. andMarsden, S. J. (1956). Parthenogenesis in eggs of Beltsville small white turkeys.Poultry Science,35, 74–682.Google Scholar
  41. Pincus, G. (1939). The breeding of some rabbits produced by recipients of artificially activated ova.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Wash.,25, 557–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Poole, H. K. (1959). The mitotic chromosomes of parthenogenetic and normal turkey.J. Hered.,50, 150–154.Google Scholar
  43. Poole, H. K. andOlsen, M. W. (1957). The sex of parthenogenetic turkey embryos.J. Hered.,48, 217–218.Google Scholar
  44. Rosen, D. E. Zoogeography and evolution of New World Cyprinodont Fishes of the family Poeciliidae with a revision of the genera and materials for a revision of the species. (MS)Google Scholar
  45. Smith, C. L. (1959). Hermaphroditism in some serranid fishes from Bermuda.Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci., Arts and Let.,44, 111–119.Google Scholar
  46. Snell, G. D. (1957). The homograft reaction.Ann. Rev. Microbiol.,11, 439–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Spurway, Helen (1955). Virgin births.The New Statesman and Nation,50, 651–652.Google Scholar
  48. Spurway, Helen (1957). Hermaphroditism with self-fertilization and the monthly extrusion of unfertilized eggs in the viviparous fishLebistes reticulatus.Nature,180, 1248–1251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Stolk, A. (1958). Pathological parthenogenesis in viviparous toothed carps.Nature,181, 1660.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Swarup, H., (1959). Effect of triploidy on the body size, general organization and cellular structure inGasterosteus (L.).J. Genet.,56, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Trifonowa, A. (1934). Parthenogenese der Fische.Acta Zool.,15, 183–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wickbom, T. (1943). Cytological studies on the family Cyprinodontidae.Hereditas,29, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1962

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus D. Kallman
    • 1
  1. 1.Genetics Laboratory of the New York AquariumNew York Zoological SocietyNew York

Personalised recommendations