Skip to main content
Log in

How equal is equal? A comparison of gender

  • Contemporary jewry
  • Published:
Contemporary Jewry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gender equality among American and Israeli Jews is compared in terms of educational attainment, partidpation in the paid labor force, and occupational roles. Data from the U.S. National Jewish Population Survey of 1990, Israeli data from the Central Bureau of Statistics and a special survey of Israeli married women are compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Central Bureau of Statistics, 1990a.Education and Socioeconomic Characteristics of the Population: 1983 Census of Population and Housing Publications. Israel Central Bureau of Statistics: Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1990b.Labor Force Surveys, 1988. Special Series No. 878. Israel Central Bureau of Statistics: Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1990c.Statistical Yearbook, 1990. Central Bureau of Statistics: Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiswick, Barry. 1986. “Labor Supply and Investment in Quid Quality: A Study of Jewish and Non-Jewish Women.”The Review of Economics and Statistics 68:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991. “The Economic Status of American Jews: Analysis of the 1990 National Jewish Population Survey.” Paper presented at the Conference on Policy Implications of the 1990 National Jewish Population Survey, Los Angeles (July).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Yinon, Shlomit Bechar, and Rebecca Raijman. 1987. “Occupational Sex Segregation in Israel: 1972-1983.”Israel Social Science Research 5:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, Harriet and Moshe Hartman. 1991. “Occupational Returns to the Education of Israeli Men and Women.” Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Meetings, Cincinnati (August).

  • Hartman, Moshe. 1984. “Pronatalistic Tendencies and Religiosity,”Sociology and Social Research 68:2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazleton, Leslie. 1977.Israeli Women: The Reality Behind the Myth. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izraeli, Dama. 1987. “Women in Israel. Special Issue”Israel Social Science Research 5:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izraeli, Dama and Ephariam Tabory. 1988. “The Political Context of Feminist Attitudes in Israel.”Gender and Society 2:463–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosmin, Barry A., Sidney Goldstein, Joseph Waksberg, Nava Lerer, Ariella Keysar and Jeffrey Scheckner. 1991.Highlights of the CJF 1990 NationalJewish Population Survey. New York: Council of Jewish Federations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, Alisa. 1992. “Married Women’s Labor Force Participation and Part-time Employment in Israel.” Paper presented at the American Sociological Association meetings, Pittsburgh, August.

  • Lieblich, Amia. 1987. “Preliminary Comparison of Israeli and American Successful Career Woman at Mid-Life.”Israel Social Science Research 5:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education and Culture. 1989.What the Numbers Tell Us about the Educational System -1989. Jerusalem: Israeli Ministry of Education and Culture (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. 1991.Digest of Education Statistics, 1991. Washington, D.C.:U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safir, Marilyn. 1991. “Religion, Tradition and Public Policy Give Family First Priority.” Pp. 57–65 in Barbara Swirski and Marilyn Safir (eds.)Calling the Equality Bluff: Women in Israel. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swirski, Barbara and Marilyn Safir (eds.). 1991.Calling the Equality Bluff: Women in Israel New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toren, Nina. 1991. “Women at the Top: Female Full Professors in Higher Education in Israel.” Pp. 165–184 in G. P. Kelly and S. Slaughter (eds.).Women’s Higher Education in Comparative Perspective. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census.Statistical Abstract, 1990. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartman, H., Hartman, M. How equal is equal? A comparison of gender. Cont Jewry 14, 48–72 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985892

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985892

Keywords

Navigation